Exploring Differences in the Impact of Users’ Traces on Arabic and English Facebook Search

Ismail Badache
{"title":"Exploring Differences in the Impact of Users’ Traces on Arabic and English Facebook Search","authors":"Ismail Badache","doi":"10.1145/3350546.3352522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes an approach on Facebook search in Arabic and English, which exploits several users’ traces (e.g. comment, share, reactions) left on Facebook posts to estimate their social importance. Our goal is to show how these social traces (signals) can play a vital role in improving Arabic and English Facebook search. Firstly, we identify polarities (positive or negative) carried by the textual signals (e.g. comments) and non-textual ones (e.g. the reactions love and sad) for a given Facebook posts. Therefore, the polarity of each comment expressed in Arabic or in English on a given Facebook post, is estimated on the basis of a neural sentiment model. Secondly, we group signals according to their complementarity using attributes (features) selection algorithms. Thirdly, we apply learning to rank (LTR) algorithms to re-rank Facebook search results based on the selected groups of signals. Finally, experiments are carried out on 13,500 Facebook posts, collected from 45 topics, for each of the two languages. Experiments results reveal that Random Forests was the most effective LTR approach for this task, and for the both languages. However, the best appropriate features selection algorithms are ReliefFAttributeEval and InfoGainAttributeEval for Arabic and English Facebook search task, respectively.","PeriodicalId":171168,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3350546.3352522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach on Facebook search in Arabic and English, which exploits several users’ traces (e.g. comment, share, reactions) left on Facebook posts to estimate their social importance. Our goal is to show how these social traces (signals) can play a vital role in improving Arabic and English Facebook search. Firstly, we identify polarities (positive or negative) carried by the textual signals (e.g. comments) and non-textual ones (e.g. the reactions love and sad) for a given Facebook posts. Therefore, the polarity of each comment expressed in Arabic or in English on a given Facebook post, is estimated on the basis of a neural sentiment model. Secondly, we group signals according to their complementarity using attributes (features) selection algorithms. Thirdly, we apply learning to rank (LTR) algorithms to re-rank Facebook search results based on the selected groups of signals. Finally, experiments are carried out on 13,500 Facebook posts, collected from 45 topics, for each of the two languages. Experiments results reveal that Random Forests was the most effective LTR approach for this task, and for the both languages. However, the best appropriate features selection algorithms are ReliefFAttributeEval and InfoGainAttributeEval for Arabic and English Facebook search task, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索用户痕迹对阿拉伯文和英文Facebook搜索影响的差异
本文提出了一种阿拉伯语和英语的Facebook搜索方法,该方法利用用户在Facebook帖子上留下的几个痕迹(如评论、分享、反应)来估计其社会重要性。我们的目标是展示这些社交痕迹(信号)如何在改善阿拉伯语和英语Facebook搜索中发挥重要作用。首先,我们识别出给定Facebook帖子的文本信号(如评论)和非文本信号(如爱和悲伤的反应)所携带的极性(积极或消极)。因此,在给定的Facebook帖子上,用阿拉伯语或英语表达的每条评论的极性是基于神经情绪模型估计的。其次,采用属性(特征)选择算法,根据信号的互补性对信号进行分组。第三,我们应用学习排序(LTR)算法,根据选定的信号组对Facebook搜索结果进行重新排序。最后,实验针对两种语言分别从45个主题中收集的13500个Facebook帖子进行。实验结果表明,随机森林是该任务中最有效的LTR方法,对于两种语言都是如此。然而,对于阿拉伯文和英文Facebook搜索任务,最合适的特征选择算法分别是ReliefFAttributeEval和InfoGainAttributeEval。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Issue Recommendation for Open Source Communities Exploring Differences in the Impact of Users’ Traces on Arabic and English Facebook Search Design and implementation of an open source Greek POS Tagger and Entity Recognizer using spaCy Extracting Ego-Centric Social Networks from Linked Open Data Towards an End-User Layer for Data Integrity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1