Exploring the Use of South African Ethnic and Racial Slurs on Social Media

Sonia Mbowa
{"title":"Exploring the Use of South African Ethnic and Racial Slurs on Social Media","authors":"Sonia Mbowa","doi":"10.13169/intecritdivestud.3.1.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I use discourse analysis as a framework to examine Facebook posts and understand how South African ethnic and racial slurs are used and responded to on social media platforms. I illustrate how language in general and slurs in particular work as tools for the negotiation, (re)production, (re)circulation and maintenance of particular ethnic and racial identities and representations. My findings focus on two interrelated aspects of the data: the first concerns the discursive features of the initial posts and the second relates to subsequent responses to the posts. The close examination of initial posts reveals the ways in which the original posters (OPs) position themselves and those they refer to using these slurs. Social media interlocutors recognise the words “kaffir”, “coolie”, “Hottentot” and “makwerekwere” as strongly tied to power and racial/ethnic identity and deliberately use them to provoke controversial debates and to construct “us vs. them” scenarios. The significance of the study is twofold: firstly, it contributes to literature that highlights the role of social media platforms as vehicles for racial and ethnic hate speech. Secondly, it underlines the complexities of race and ethnic relations in the country by highlighting the need for robust discussions around the way South Africans view themselves in comparison to out-group members, including other Africans.","PeriodicalId":224459,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/intecritdivestud.3.1.0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper, I use discourse analysis as a framework to examine Facebook posts and understand how South African ethnic and racial slurs are used and responded to on social media platforms. I illustrate how language in general and slurs in particular work as tools for the negotiation, (re)production, (re)circulation and maintenance of particular ethnic and racial identities and representations. My findings focus on two interrelated aspects of the data: the first concerns the discursive features of the initial posts and the second relates to subsequent responses to the posts. The close examination of initial posts reveals the ways in which the original posters (OPs) position themselves and those they refer to using these slurs. Social media interlocutors recognise the words “kaffir”, “coolie”, “Hottentot” and “makwerekwere” as strongly tied to power and racial/ethnic identity and deliberately use them to provoke controversial debates and to construct “us vs. them” scenarios. The significance of the study is twofold: firstly, it contributes to literature that highlights the role of social media platforms as vehicles for racial and ethnic hate speech. Secondly, it underlines the complexities of race and ethnic relations in the country by highlighting the need for robust discussions around the way South Africans view themselves in comparison to out-group members, including other Africans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索在社交媒体上使用南非民族和种族辱骂
在本文中,我使用话语分析作为框架来检查Facebook帖子,并了解如何在社交媒体平台上使用和回应南非民族和种族诽谤。我举例说明了语言,特别是污言秽语是如何作为谈判、(再)生产、(再)流通和维护特定民族和种族身份和表征的工具。我的发现集中在数据的两个相关方面:第一个涉及最初帖子的话语特征,第二个涉及对帖子的后续回应。对最初帖子的仔细审查揭示了原始发帖者(OPs)如何定位自己以及他们提到使用这些诽谤的方式。社交媒体上的对话者认为“kaffir”、“苦力”、“Hottentot”和“makwerekwere”这些词与权力和种族/民族身份紧密相关,并故意使用它们来引发有争议的辩论,构建“我们vs.他们”的场景。这项研究具有双重意义:首先,它为强调社交媒体平台作为种族和民族仇恨言论工具的作用的文献做出了贡献。其次,它强调需要围绕南非人如何看待自己与群体外成员(包括其他非洲人)的比较进行热烈讨论,从而强调了该国种族和民族关系的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies University Leaders as Inhibitors or Influencers of Systemic Change for Marginalised Youth Another World Exploring the Use of South African Ethnic and Racial Slurs on Social Media Hegemonic Masculinity in K. Sello Duiker's The Quiet Violence of Dreams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1