The (Trans)National Mobilisation of Sámi Women in Norway

Beatrice Halsaa
{"title":"The (Trans)National Mobilisation of Sámi Women in Norway","authors":"Beatrice Halsaa","doi":"10.13154/MTS.63.2020.119-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how the Norwegian Sami women’s movement developed at the crossroad of indigenous, anti-racist, and women’s movements. How did Sami women negotiate feminist and indigenous rights, and in what ways did they frame the three Nordic Forum conferences as opportunities for activism or threats? The article accounts for the making of the movement since the 1970s, and explores its’ presence/ absence during the three specific Nordic women’s conferences, the Nordic Forum of 1988, 1994 and 2014. In what ways were the Nordic Forums framed as opportunities for activism, and what kind of new actors and institutional logics were produced (or not) in relation to the three events? The article illuminates how the political opportunity structures differed across time, and how Sami feminists framed them and took advantage of them. The analysis is inspired by post-colonial and indigenous feminist theories, and firstly examines what enabled Sami women to organise on their own, secondly it explores how alliance formations played into the movements’ startling presence at the two first Nordic Forums, and its absence from the last one. The analysis draws on new empirical material, such as extensive archival work and semi-structured interviews with Sami women, stakeholders and participants in the three conferences. Methodological considerations of insider and outsider dynamics lend support to the relevance of postcolonial and indigenous feminist theories in research practice, but also critically question indigenous epistemology.","PeriodicalId":218833,"journal":{"name":"Moving the Social","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moving the Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13154/MTS.63.2020.119-145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article explores how the Norwegian Sami women’s movement developed at the crossroad of indigenous, anti-racist, and women’s movements. How did Sami women negotiate feminist and indigenous rights, and in what ways did they frame the three Nordic Forum conferences as opportunities for activism or threats? The article accounts for the making of the movement since the 1970s, and explores its’ presence/ absence during the three specific Nordic women’s conferences, the Nordic Forum of 1988, 1994 and 2014. In what ways were the Nordic Forums framed as opportunities for activism, and what kind of new actors and institutional logics were produced (or not) in relation to the three events? The article illuminates how the political opportunity structures differed across time, and how Sami feminists framed them and took advantage of them. The analysis is inspired by post-colonial and indigenous feminist theories, and firstly examines what enabled Sami women to organise on their own, secondly it explores how alliance formations played into the movements’ startling presence at the two first Nordic Forums, and its absence from the last one. The analysis draws on new empirical material, such as extensive archival work and semi-structured interviews with Sami women, stakeholders and participants in the three conferences. Methodological considerations of insider and outsider dynamics lend support to the relevance of postcolonial and indigenous feminist theories in research practice, but also critically question indigenous epistemology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(跨)全国动员Sámi挪威妇女
本文探讨挪威萨米妇女运动是如何在原住民、反种族主义和妇女运动的十字路口发展起来的。萨米妇女是如何协商女权主义和土著权利的?她们又以何种方式将三次北欧论坛会议视为行动主义的机会或威胁?本文叙述了自20世纪70年代以来这一运动的形成,并探讨了它在三次具体的北欧妇女会议(1988年、1994年和2014年的北欧论坛)中的存在/缺席。北欧论坛以何种方式被视为行动主义的机会,与这三个事件相关的新参与者和制度逻辑产生了(或没有产生)什么?这篇文章阐明了不同时期的政治机会结构是如何不同的,以及萨米女权主义者是如何构建并利用它们的。该分析受到后殖民主义和本土女权主义理论的启发,首先考察了是什么使萨米妇女能够自己组织起来,其次探讨了联盟的形成是如何促成这些运动在前两届北欧论坛上的惊人存在,以及在最后一届论坛上的缺席。该分析利用了新的经验材料,如广泛的档案工作和对萨米妇女、利益相关者和三次会议参与者的半结构化访谈。内部和外部动态的方法论考虑为后殖民和土著女性主义理论在研究实践中的相关性提供了支持,但也批判性地质疑土著认识论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Meaning of Free Labour after the Second World War Unconditioned Freedom Beyond Wage Labour Changing Degrees of ‘Openness’ The Shadow Economy and Ideas of Freedom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1