Technology and Innovation Management Indicators and Assessment Based on Government Performance

S. Marinković, Jovana Rakićević, M. Jakšić
{"title":"Technology and Innovation Management Indicators and Assessment Based on Government Performance","authors":"S. Marinković, Jovana Rakićević, M. Jakšić","doi":"10.7595/MANAGEMENT.FON.2016.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout large global databases, such as OECD, UNDP, ITU, Eurostat, World Bank, and Statistical offices of countries, there are many indicators that refer to Technology and Innovation Management (TIM) performance of countries. However, a question arises of how to classify and systematically analyze these indicators in terms of measuring, monitoring and enhancing TIM performance at a national level. More specifically, in this paper we pose a question of how to assess the government performance in TIM, as one aspect of the Triple Helix model. Therefore, we use a model of thirty-nine indicators which are classified according to three main management functions: planning, organizing and control, observed as input, process and output, respectively. More importantly, we analyze the relations that exist between these three categories of indicators. Planning indicators are observed as the investments in technological and innovative activities; organizing indicators include the infrastructure, public administration efficiency and cooperation support, while control indicators refer to the national economy R&D, transfer effects and entrepreneurship outcomes. The model is tested for assessing and comparing government performance in TIM for three countries: Serbia, Croatia and Slovenia, for the time period 2007-2012. Finally, as a feedback in the model, we used scores of the countries according to the Global Innovation Index and the Global Competitiveness Index, to verify the results and provide the final conclusion.","PeriodicalId":116669,"journal":{"name":"Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7595/MANAGEMENT.FON.2016.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Throughout large global databases, such as OECD, UNDP, ITU, Eurostat, World Bank, and Statistical offices of countries, there are many indicators that refer to Technology and Innovation Management (TIM) performance of countries. However, a question arises of how to classify and systematically analyze these indicators in terms of measuring, monitoring and enhancing TIM performance at a national level. More specifically, in this paper we pose a question of how to assess the government performance in TIM, as one aspect of the Triple Helix model. Therefore, we use a model of thirty-nine indicators which are classified according to three main management functions: planning, organizing and control, observed as input, process and output, respectively. More importantly, we analyze the relations that exist between these three categories of indicators. Planning indicators are observed as the investments in technological and innovative activities; organizing indicators include the infrastructure, public administration efficiency and cooperation support, while control indicators refer to the national economy R&D, transfer effects and entrepreneurship outcomes. The model is tested for assessing and comparing government performance in TIM for three countries: Serbia, Croatia and Slovenia, for the time period 2007-2012. Finally, as a feedback in the model, we used scores of the countries according to the Global Innovation Index and the Global Competitiveness Index, to verify the results and provide the final conclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于政府绩效的技术创新管理指标与评价
在经合组织、开发计划署、国际电联、欧盟统计局、世界银行和各国统计局等大型全球数据库中,有许多指标涉及各国的技术和创新管理(TIM)绩效。但是,出现了一个问题,即如何在国家一级对这些指标进行分类和系统地分析,以衡量、监测和加强TIM的业绩。更具体地说,在本文中,我们提出了如何评估政府绩效的问题,作为三螺旋模型的一个方面。因此,我们使用了一个包含39个指标的模型,这些指标根据三个主要的管理功能进行分类:计划、组织和控制、观察作为输入、过程和输出。更重要的是,我们分析了这三类指标之间存在的关系。规划指标被视为对技术和创新活动的投资;组织指标包括基础设施、公共管理效率和合作支持度,控制指标包括国民经济研发、转移效应和创业成果。对该模型进行了测试,以评估和比较塞尔维亚、克罗地亚和斯洛文尼亚这三个国家2007-2012年在TIM中的政府表现。最后,作为模型的反馈,我们使用各国根据全球创新指数和全球竞争力指数的得分来验证结果并提供最终结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategic orientation of SMEs: empirical research Social Enterprises in Serbia: Analysis of Key Development Factors, Major Actors and their Relationships Antecedents of Hotel Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Belgrade Elements for Designing Stakeholders’ Programmes of Encouraging Young People to Engage in Entrepreneurship Application of Dynamic Programming in Planning Costs of Telecommunication Security Operations to Provide Aid to Civilian Authorities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1