ARTISTIC NONCONFORMISM OF TRANSCARPATHIA OF 1960–1980: INTELLECTUAL BACKGROUND AND PERSONALITIES

Oksana Havrosh, Nataliia Rebryk
{"title":"ARTISTIC NONCONFORMISM OF TRANSCARPATHIA OF 1960–1980: INTELLECTUAL BACKGROUND AND PERSONALITIES","authors":"Oksana Havrosh, Nataliia Rebryk","doi":"10.30525/978-9934-26-065-0-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts an artistic and aesthetic analysis of modern art of Transcarpathia in the 1960s – 1980s, defined as nonconformism and underground, arguing that artists really contradicted the established philosophical, ethical, aesthetic codes of society and directed their art to self-expression. Having analyzed art processes in Transcarpathia during the Khrushchev «Thaw» and the 1980s, the authors have outlined the preconditions of manifestation and dissemination of ideas of nonconformism in the artistic environment of Transcarpathia and in the works of P. Bedzir, E. Kremnytska and F. Seman. The article conveys the idea that the artistic underground environment of Transcarpathia is a definite and courageous response of creative personalities to the reactionary social phenomena of the 1960s – 1980s, and the general analysis of alternative painting genre of Transcarpathia in the 1970s – 1980s reveals a wide range of influences both of world art trends and features of ethno-culture of Transcarpathia. The works of F. Manailo, E. Kremnytska, P. Bedzir, F. Seman, Y. Cherni were distinguished by their individual technique of creating compositions, the search for new methods of shaping, which rather corresponded to the state of enlightenment. Unlike artistic manifestations in the spirit of socialist realism,","PeriodicalId":385306,"journal":{"name":"ART: METAMORPHOSES AND DISCOURSES","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ART: METAMORPHOSES AND DISCOURSES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-065-0-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article attempts an artistic and aesthetic analysis of modern art of Transcarpathia in the 1960s – 1980s, defined as nonconformism and underground, arguing that artists really contradicted the established philosophical, ethical, aesthetic codes of society and directed their art to self-expression. Having analyzed art processes in Transcarpathia during the Khrushchev «Thaw» and the 1980s, the authors have outlined the preconditions of manifestation and dissemination of ideas of nonconformism in the artistic environment of Transcarpathia and in the works of P. Bedzir, E. Kremnytska and F. Seman. The article conveys the idea that the artistic underground environment of Transcarpathia is a definite and courageous response of creative personalities to the reactionary social phenomena of the 1960s – 1980s, and the general analysis of alternative painting genre of Transcarpathia in the 1970s – 1980s reveals a wide range of influences both of world art trends and features of ethno-culture of Transcarpathia. The works of F. Manailo, E. Kremnytska, P. Bedzir, F. Seman, Y. Cherni were distinguished by their individual technique of creating compositions, the search for new methods of shaping, which rather corresponded to the state of enlightenment. Unlike artistic manifestations in the spirit of socialist realism,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1960-1980年跨喀尔巴阡的艺术不墨守成规:知识背景与个性
本文试图从艺术和美学的角度分析20世纪60 - 80年代的跨喀尔巴阡山脉的现代艺术,将其定义为不墨守成规的地下艺术,认为艺术家们确实违背了既定的社会哲学、伦理和美学规范,并将他们的艺术导向自我表达。在分析了赫鲁晓夫“解冻”时期和20世纪80年代外喀尔巴阡山脉的艺术进程后,作者概述了在外喀尔巴阡山脉的艺术环境以及P. Bedzir, E. Kremnytska和F. Seman的作品中,不墨成俗成的思想的表现和传播的先决条件。文章认为,《喀尔巴阡山脉》的地下艺术环境是创作人士对60 - 80年代反动社会现象的明确而勇敢的回应,并通过对70 - 80年代《喀尔巴阡山脉》另类绘画流派的综合分析,揭示了世界艺术思潮和《喀尔巴阡山脉》民族文化特征的广泛影响。F. Manailo, E. Kremnytska, P. Bedzir, F. Seman, Y. Cherni的作品以其独特的创作技巧而闻名,他们寻找新的造型方法,这与启蒙状态相对应。与社会主义现实主义精神的艺术表现不同,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ARTISTIC NONCONFORMISM OF TRANSCARPATHIA OF 1960–1980: INTELLECTUAL BACKGROUND AND PERSONALITIES POP ART IMAGE AND DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS AND MODERN DESIGN TRENDS ASSIMILATION SEMIOTIC CODES OF THE COSTUME IN THE POLITICAL THEATER PERFORMANCES IN THE USSR OF THE 1930S VARIATIONS OF POSTMODERNISM IN THE PAINTING OF CHERNIVTSI ARTISTS WALKING MAN: FROM AESTHETICS TO ART PRACTICES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1