{"title":"ARTISTIC NONCONFORMISM OF TRANSCARPATHIA OF 1960–1980: INTELLECTUAL BACKGROUND AND PERSONALITIES","authors":"Oksana Havrosh, Nataliia Rebryk","doi":"10.30525/978-9934-26-065-0-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts an artistic and aesthetic analysis of modern art of Transcarpathia in the 1960s – 1980s, defined as nonconformism and underground, arguing that artists really contradicted the established philosophical, ethical, aesthetic codes of society and directed their art to self-expression. Having analyzed art processes in Transcarpathia during the Khrushchev «Thaw» and the 1980s, the authors have outlined the preconditions of manifestation and dissemination of ideas of nonconformism in the artistic environment of Transcarpathia and in the works of P. Bedzir, E. Kremnytska and F. Seman. The article conveys the idea that the artistic underground environment of Transcarpathia is a definite and courageous response of creative personalities to the reactionary social phenomena of the 1960s – 1980s, and the general analysis of alternative painting genre of Transcarpathia in the 1970s – 1980s reveals a wide range of influences both of world art trends and features of ethno-culture of Transcarpathia. The works of F. Manailo, E. Kremnytska, P. Bedzir, F. Seman, Y. Cherni were distinguished by their individual technique of creating compositions, the search for new methods of shaping, which rather corresponded to the state of enlightenment. Unlike artistic manifestations in the spirit of socialist realism,","PeriodicalId":385306,"journal":{"name":"ART: METAMORPHOSES AND DISCOURSES","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ART: METAMORPHOSES AND DISCOURSES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-065-0-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article attempts an artistic and aesthetic analysis of modern art of Transcarpathia in the 1960s – 1980s, defined as nonconformism and underground, arguing that artists really contradicted the established philosophical, ethical, aesthetic codes of society and directed their art to self-expression. Having analyzed art processes in Transcarpathia during the Khrushchev «Thaw» and the 1980s, the authors have outlined the preconditions of manifestation and dissemination of ideas of nonconformism in the artistic environment of Transcarpathia and in the works of P. Bedzir, E. Kremnytska and F. Seman. The article conveys the idea that the artistic underground environment of Transcarpathia is a definite and courageous response of creative personalities to the reactionary social phenomena of the 1960s – 1980s, and the general analysis of alternative painting genre of Transcarpathia in the 1970s – 1980s reveals a wide range of influences both of world art trends and features of ethno-culture of Transcarpathia. The works of F. Manailo, E. Kremnytska, P. Bedzir, F. Seman, Y. Cherni were distinguished by their individual technique of creating compositions, the search for new methods of shaping, which rather corresponded to the state of enlightenment. Unlike artistic manifestations in the spirit of socialist realism,
本文试图从艺术和美学的角度分析20世纪60 - 80年代的跨喀尔巴阡山脉的现代艺术,将其定义为不墨守成规的地下艺术,认为艺术家们确实违背了既定的社会哲学、伦理和美学规范,并将他们的艺术导向自我表达。在分析了赫鲁晓夫“解冻”时期和20世纪80年代外喀尔巴阡山脉的艺术进程后,作者概述了在外喀尔巴阡山脉的艺术环境以及P. Bedzir, E. Kremnytska和F. Seman的作品中,不墨成俗成的思想的表现和传播的先决条件。文章认为,《喀尔巴阡山脉》的地下艺术环境是创作人士对60 - 80年代反动社会现象的明确而勇敢的回应,并通过对70 - 80年代《喀尔巴阡山脉》另类绘画流派的综合分析,揭示了世界艺术思潮和《喀尔巴阡山脉》民族文化特征的广泛影响。F. Manailo, E. Kremnytska, P. Bedzir, F. Seman, Y. Cherni的作品以其独特的创作技巧而闻名,他们寻找新的造型方法,这与启蒙状态相对应。与社会主义现实主义精神的艺术表现不同,