SELF-REGULATION IN THE HOUSING LEGAL REGULATION MECHANISM

Veronica Karyagina
{"title":"SELF-REGULATION IN THE HOUSING LEGAL REGULATION MECHANISM","authors":"Veronica Karyagina","doi":"10.33693/2072-3164-2022-15-7-103-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research. The increased concern in the research community to various problems of the mechanism of legal regulation, taking into account the sectoral characteristics has predetermined the need to identify its specificity in relation to the housing sector and to clarify the role of self-regulation as an independent use by participants of law enforcement activities in the field of housing system of private law means of implementation of their housing rights. The article considers the correlation between self-regulation and the most significant elements of the mechanism of legal regulation of housing relations, it also traces the dynamics of their interaction and identifies sector-specific features of self-regulation in relation to the housing sector. The purpose of the study is to identify the specific features of self-regulation in the housing sector and to determine its role in the mechanism of legal regulation of housing relations. Results. The author concludes that the complex nature of the legal regulation of housing relations, which combines elements of both private law and public law regulation, arises from the heterogeneous nature of housing relations themselves. Differentiation of legal regulation of housing relations is based on differences in methods, ways and techniques of legal impact on relations in the housing sector, which ultimately determines the peculiarities of the mechanism of their legal regulation. The central role in the system of civil law legal means of regulating that part of housing relations, which are by their legal nature civil law relations, belongs to such key civil law instruments as civil law contract, legal entity, decisions of meetings. The discretionary nature of civil law regulation of housing relations gives its participants the possibility of choosing their own legal ways and means of satisfying their private interests, and therefore the possibility of self-regulation. Self-regulation in the mechanism of legal regulation of housing relations is the use of legal means directly by the participants of the relations regulated by housing law to structure their own behaviour, independent determination of their rights and duties within the law. Self-regulation in the housing sphere is closely interconnected with such elements of the mechanism of legal regulation of housing relations as norms and legal relations. The normative foundation of self-regulation in the housing sphere is primarily of dispositive norms. The significance of dispositive rules in the regulatory impact of housing law on the housing relations that constitute its subject matter lies in enabling the parties to exercise rights and fulfil duties in accordance with an individual pattern of behaviour agreed upon in the process of self-regulation. The most important legal means by which self-regulation is achieved is the category of «discretion», which gives subjects of housing legal relations the possibility of free choice of the optimum way of exercising subjective housing rights. The legal ground for self-regulation in the housing sector is provided by the norms-principles enshrined in the housing legislation - the principle of legal equality and the principle of economic freedom, the content of which is differentiated depending on the subject composition of enforcement. Self-regulation in the field of housing has sectoral specificity determined by the peculiarities of the subject composition of the regulated relations and the object about which these relations are formed. The diversity of housing rights and the particularities of their exercise imply a wide range of subjects exercising their rights, thus requiring a constant balancing act not only between private and public interests, but also between the set of private interests themselves. In this context, the limits to the exercise of housing rights, which have a significant impact on self-regulation, are of particular importance. The exercise of certain housing rights by virtue of the requirements of housing legislation is subject to the need for getting the approval or authorisation. The peculiarity of self-regulation in housing sector is also the fact that for the emergence of most legal relations, in which housing rights and duties are implemented, self-regulation alone is not enough, but individual-contractual regulation is required, which, compared to other types of legal regulation, is more dependent on the will of the subjects of contractual obligation, optimization of interaction between the subjects is achieved through self-regulation. The use of the contractual form of regulation makes it possible to coordinate the multiple interests of the participants in housing relationships.","PeriodicalId":446864,"journal":{"name":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","volume":"40 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2022-15-7-103-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the research. The increased concern in the research community to various problems of the mechanism of legal regulation, taking into account the sectoral characteristics has predetermined the need to identify its specificity in relation to the housing sector and to clarify the role of self-regulation as an independent use by participants of law enforcement activities in the field of housing system of private law means of implementation of their housing rights. The article considers the correlation between self-regulation and the most significant elements of the mechanism of legal regulation of housing relations, it also traces the dynamics of their interaction and identifies sector-specific features of self-regulation in relation to the housing sector. The purpose of the study is to identify the specific features of self-regulation in the housing sector and to determine its role in the mechanism of legal regulation of housing relations. Results. The author concludes that the complex nature of the legal regulation of housing relations, which combines elements of both private law and public law regulation, arises from the heterogeneous nature of housing relations themselves. Differentiation of legal regulation of housing relations is based on differences in methods, ways and techniques of legal impact on relations in the housing sector, which ultimately determines the peculiarities of the mechanism of their legal regulation. The central role in the system of civil law legal means of regulating that part of housing relations, which are by their legal nature civil law relations, belongs to such key civil law instruments as civil law contract, legal entity, decisions of meetings. The discretionary nature of civil law regulation of housing relations gives its participants the possibility of choosing their own legal ways and means of satisfying their private interests, and therefore the possibility of self-regulation. Self-regulation in the mechanism of legal regulation of housing relations is the use of legal means directly by the participants of the relations regulated by housing law to structure their own behaviour, independent determination of their rights and duties within the law. Self-regulation in the housing sphere is closely interconnected with such elements of the mechanism of legal regulation of housing relations as norms and legal relations. The normative foundation of self-regulation in the housing sphere is primarily of dispositive norms. The significance of dispositive rules in the regulatory impact of housing law on the housing relations that constitute its subject matter lies in enabling the parties to exercise rights and fulfil duties in accordance with an individual pattern of behaviour agreed upon in the process of self-regulation. The most important legal means by which self-regulation is achieved is the category of «discretion», which gives subjects of housing legal relations the possibility of free choice of the optimum way of exercising subjective housing rights. The legal ground for self-regulation in the housing sector is provided by the norms-principles enshrined in the housing legislation - the principle of legal equality and the principle of economic freedom, the content of which is differentiated depending on the subject composition of enforcement. Self-regulation in the field of housing has sectoral specificity determined by the peculiarities of the subject composition of the regulated relations and the object about which these relations are formed. The diversity of housing rights and the particularities of their exercise imply a wide range of subjects exercising their rights, thus requiring a constant balancing act not only between private and public interests, but also between the set of private interests themselves. In this context, the limits to the exercise of housing rights, which have a significant impact on self-regulation, are of particular importance. The exercise of certain housing rights by virtue of the requirements of housing legislation is subject to the need for getting the approval or authorisation. The peculiarity of self-regulation in housing sector is also the fact that for the emergence of most legal relations, in which housing rights and duties are implemented, self-regulation alone is not enough, but individual-contractual regulation is required, which, compared to other types of legal regulation, is more dependent on the will of the subjects of contractual obligation, optimization of interaction between the subjects is achieved through self-regulation. The use of the contractual form of regulation makes it possible to coordinate the multiple interests of the participants in housing relationships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我规制在住房法律规制机制中的作用
研究的目的。考虑到部门的特点,研究界日益关注法律管制机制的各种问题,这决定了必须确定其与住房部门有关的特殊性,并澄清自我管制作为住房系统领域执法活动的参与者独立使用私法手段行使其住房权利的作用。本文考虑了自我监管与住房关系法律监管机制的最重要要素之间的相关性,还追溯了它们相互作用的动态,并确定了与住房部门相关的自我监管的部门特定特征。本研究的目的是确定住房部门自我调节的具体特征,并确定其在住房关系法律调节机制中的作用。结果。本文认为,住房关系法律规制的复杂性源于住房关系本身的异质性,它结合了私法和公法规制的要素。住房关系法律规制的差异性是基于对住房部门关系施加法律影响的方法、途径和技巧的不同,这最终决定了其法律规制机制的特殊性。这部分房屋关系就其法律性质而言,属于民法合同、法人实体、会议决定等重要的民事法律文书,在调节这部分房屋关系的民法法律手段体系中起着核心作用。民法规制住房关系的自由裁量性使其参与者有可能选择自己的合法方式和手段来满足自己的私人利益,从而具有自我规制的可能性。房屋关系法律规制机制中的自我规制是指房屋法规制关系的参与者直接运用法律手段来建构自己的行为,在法律范围内自主确定自己的权利和义务。住房领域的自我规制与住房关系法律规制机制中的规范、法律关系等要素密切相关。住房领域自我规制的规范基础主要是支配性规范。在住房法对构成其主体的住房关系的调节影响方面,决定性规则的意义在于使各方能够按照在自我调节过程中商定的个人行为模式行使权利和履行义务。实现自我规制的最重要的法律手段是“自由裁量权”范畴,它赋予了住房法律关系主体自由选择行使主观住房权利的最佳方式的可能性。房屋法例所载的准则-原则,即法律平等原则和经济自由原则,为房屋界别的自我规管提供了法律依据。这些原则的内容因执法的主体组成而有所不同。住房领域的自我调节具有部门的特殊性,这取决于调节关系的主体构成和形成这些关系的客体的特殊性。住房权利的多样性及其行使的特殊性意味着行使其权利的主体范围广泛,因此不仅需要在私人利益和公共利益之间,而且需要在私人利益本身之间进行持续的平衡。在这方面,对行使住房权利的限制特别重要,因为这对自我调节有重大影响。根据房屋法例的规定行使某些房屋权利,须获得批准或授权。住房领域自我规制的特殊性还在于,大多数履行住房权利义务的法律关系的出现,单靠自我规制是不够的,需要个体-契约规制,与其他类型的法律规制相比,个体-契约规制更依赖于契约义务主体的意志,通过自我规制实现主体间互动的优化。契约规制形式的运用,使得协调住房关系参与者的多重利益成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY IN MODERN REALITIES: PUBLIC-LEGAL AND PRIVATE LEGAL ASPECTS SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE CREATION OF A DATA MATRIX AS A PRIORITY INSTRUMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE «SINGLE WINDOW» MECHANISM IN THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION CTP INSURANCE IN THE LEGAL ASPECT: NEW APPROACHES AND PROSPECTS CATEGORIES OF «SUFFICIENCY» AND «MERIT» WHEN DECIDING ON THE RELEASE OF A PERSON FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY ON EVALUATIVE GROUNDS PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND PROTECTION OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN OF MOBILIZED CITIZENS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1