{"title":"CTP INSURANCE IN THE LEGAL ASPECT: NEW APPROACHES AND PROSPECTS","authors":"Y. Ovchinnikova","doi":"10.33693/2072-3164-2023-16-2-175-181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article notes the relevance to date of the problems of law enforcement in legal relations on civil liability insurance of vehicle owners. The author touches upon the economic and legal aspects of CTP. Judicial practice has been analyzed, gaps in legislation have been identified, and proposals for making appropriate changes have been made. Conclusions. By its legal nature, the subjective right of choice granted by law to the victim, which consists in repairing the vehicle (despite non-compliance with the requirements) or in refusing to fulfill the insurance obligation in kind, is not an opportunity to choose the method of execution, which is understood as monetary or in-kind forms of insurance compensation. For this reason, the insurance obligation for this category of victims (citizens of the Russian Federation who are owners of vehicles registered in the Russian Federation) does not apply to alternative ones. It is necessary to establish clear and exhaustive grounds in the legislation, which are exceptions to the general rule on the form of compensation in kind for a certain category of victims (citizens of the Russian Federation who are owners of vehicles registered in the Russian Federation). The insurance obligation (we are talking, among other things, about CTP) and the legal relationship for compensation of damage in the part in which it is not covered by insurance compensation, are by their legal nature independent obligations.","PeriodicalId":446864,"journal":{"name":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaps in Russian Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2023-16-2-175-181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article notes the relevance to date of the problems of law enforcement in legal relations on civil liability insurance of vehicle owners. The author touches upon the economic and legal aspects of CTP. Judicial practice has been analyzed, gaps in legislation have been identified, and proposals for making appropriate changes have been made. Conclusions. By its legal nature, the subjective right of choice granted by law to the victim, which consists in repairing the vehicle (despite non-compliance with the requirements) or in refusing to fulfill the insurance obligation in kind, is not an opportunity to choose the method of execution, which is understood as monetary or in-kind forms of insurance compensation. For this reason, the insurance obligation for this category of victims (citizens of the Russian Federation who are owners of vehicles registered in the Russian Federation) does not apply to alternative ones. It is necessary to establish clear and exhaustive grounds in the legislation, which are exceptions to the general rule on the form of compensation in kind for a certain category of victims (citizens of the Russian Federation who are owners of vehicles registered in the Russian Federation). The insurance obligation (we are talking, among other things, about CTP) and the legal relationship for compensation of damage in the part in which it is not covered by insurance compensation, are by their legal nature independent obligations.