A Comparison of System-Controlled and User-Controlled Personalization Approaches

Rita Orji, Kiemute Oyibo, G. F. Tondello
{"title":"A Comparison of System-Controlled and User-Controlled Personalization Approaches","authors":"Rita Orji, Kiemute Oyibo, G. F. Tondello","doi":"10.1145/3099023.3099116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personalizing interactive systems including games increases their effectiveness. This paper explores and compares two main approaches to personalization: system-controlled and user-controlled adaptation. The results of large-scale exploratory studies of 1768 users show that both techniques to personalizing systems share seven common strengths of increasing users' perception of a system's relevance, usefulness, interactivity, ease of use, credibility and trust, and also increases users' self-efficacy. The results also reveal some unique strengths and weaknesses peculiar to each of the approaches that designers should take into consideration when deciding on a suitable adaptation technique to use in personalizing their systems. Users prefer system- over user-controlled adaptation.","PeriodicalId":219391,"journal":{"name":"Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3099023.3099116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Personalizing interactive systems including games increases their effectiveness. This paper explores and compares two main approaches to personalization: system-controlled and user-controlled adaptation. The results of large-scale exploratory studies of 1768 users show that both techniques to personalizing systems share seven common strengths of increasing users' perception of a system's relevance, usefulness, interactivity, ease of use, credibility and trust, and also increases users' self-efficacy. The results also reveal some unique strengths and weaknesses peculiar to each of the approaches that designers should take into consideration when deciding on a suitable adaptation technique to use in personalizing their systems. Users prefer system- over user-controlled adaptation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统控制与用户控制的个性化方法比较
个性化互动系统(包括游戏)可以提高其效率。本文探讨并比较了两种主要的个性化方法:系统控制和用户控制的自适应。对1768名用户的大规模探索性研究结果表明,这两种个性化系统技术都有7个共同的优势,即提高用户对系统相关性、有用性、交互性、易用性、可信度和信任度的感知,并提高用户的自我效能感。结果还揭示了每种方法特有的一些独特的优点和缺点,设计师在决定在个性化系统中使用合适的适应技术时应该考虑到这些优点和缺点。用户更喜欢系统而不是用户控制的适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Culture in the Effect of Age and Gender on Social Influence in Persuasive Technology Automated Data-Driven Hints for Computer Programming Students An Approach to Improve Physical Activity by Generating Individual Implementation Intentions Personalizing Social Influence Strategies in a Q&A Social Network Adaptive Support For Group Formation In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1