The consequences of the current public sector reporting framework for government accountability and decision making

J. Mack
{"title":"The consequences of the current public sector reporting framework for government accountability and decision making","authors":"J. Mack","doi":"10.4324/9781315121727-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, the changes that have occurred in the Australian government’s(Commonwealth) accounting systems and its reporting/disclosure regimes over the last 30 years and the consequential effects on accountability will be considered. Many of these changes result from a combination of several factors (Broadbent & Guthrie 1992; Ryan 1995). One of the factors proposed as being a catalyst for the changes is the emergence of the ‘new right’ and its promotion of market solutions to public sector resourcing problems (Hood 1991). Whilst the focus here is on the Australian Commonwealth government, it is also relevant to the various state governments within Australia that have adopted similar changes and to international jurisdictions since these changes have also occurred in other western democracies. As an example, accrual accounting, badged as resource accounting, was introduced in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2001 (Connolly & Hyndman 2006). There were in the UK, as there had been in Australia, concerns about the ability of accrual accounting to deliver effective accountability mechanisms (Carlin 2005).","PeriodicalId":315824,"journal":{"name":"Public Sector Accounting, Accountability and Governance","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Sector Accounting, Accountability and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315121727-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this chapter, the changes that have occurred in the Australian government’s(Commonwealth) accounting systems and its reporting/disclosure regimes over the last 30 years and the consequential effects on accountability will be considered. Many of these changes result from a combination of several factors (Broadbent & Guthrie 1992; Ryan 1995). One of the factors proposed as being a catalyst for the changes is the emergence of the ‘new right’ and its promotion of market solutions to public sector resourcing problems (Hood 1991). Whilst the focus here is on the Australian Commonwealth government, it is also relevant to the various state governments within Australia that have adopted similar changes and to international jurisdictions since these changes have also occurred in other western democracies. As an example, accrual accounting, badged as resource accounting, was introduced in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2001 (Connolly & Hyndman 2006). There were in the UK, as there had been in Australia, concerns about the ability of accrual accounting to deliver effective accountability mechanisms (Carlin 2005).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现行公共部门报告框架对政府问责制和决策的影响
在本章中,将考虑澳大利亚政府(联邦)会计系统及其报告/披露制度在过去30年中发生的变化及其对问责制的相应影响。许多这些变化是由几个因素共同作用的结果(Broadbent & Guthrie 1992;瑞安1995)。人们提出的促成这些变化的因素之一是“新权利”的出现及其对公共部门资源问题的市场解决方案的促进(Hood 1991)。虽然这里的重点是澳大利亚联邦政府,但它也与澳大利亚的各个州政府有关,这些州政府已经采取了类似的变化和国际司法管辖区,因为这些变化也发生在其他西方民主国家。例如,权责发生制会计被称为资源会计,于2001年在英国引入(Connolly & Hyndman 2006)。与澳大利亚一样,英国也有人担心权责发生制会计能否提供有效的问责机制(Carlin 2005)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The consequences of the current public sector reporting framework for government accountability and decision making Differential reporting Conclusion and globalising accounting, accountability and governance Watching the watchdogs The intention and the reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1