Comparison of Deep Architectures for Indoor RF Signal Classification

Tamizhelakkiya, P. Chandhar, Sabitha Gauni
{"title":"Comparison of Deep Architectures for Indoor RF Signal Classification","authors":"Tamizhelakkiya, P. Chandhar, Sabitha Gauni","doi":"10.1109/ICETCI51973.2021.9574083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we study the performance of three different Deep Learning (DL) network architectures in Radio Frequency (RF) signal classification tasks considering an indoor environment. We compare the classification accuracy of 7 modulation types (BPSK, QPSK, GMSK, 16-QAM, 64-QAM, GFSK, and CPFSK) with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network, and Residual Network (ResNet) architectures by varying receiver positions in a building layout along with two different transmitter positions. It is seen that, in the considered scenario, for a given transmitter position, CNN and LSTM architectures provide better classification accuracy depending on the receiver positions. It is also seen that in certain receiver positions, some of the modulation types perform better than others.","PeriodicalId":281877,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Emerging Techniques in Computational Intelligence (ICETCI)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Emerging Techniques in Computational Intelligence (ICETCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETCI51973.2021.9574083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we study the performance of three different Deep Learning (DL) network architectures in Radio Frequency (RF) signal classification tasks considering an indoor environment. We compare the classification accuracy of 7 modulation types (BPSK, QPSK, GMSK, 16-QAM, 64-QAM, GFSK, and CPFSK) with Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network, and Residual Network (ResNet) architectures by varying receiver positions in a building layout along with two different transmitter positions. It is seen that, in the considered scenario, for a given transmitter position, CNN and LSTM architectures provide better classification accuracy depending on the receiver positions. It is also seen that in certain receiver positions, some of the modulation types perform better than others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
室内射频信号分类的深度体系结构比较
在本文中,我们研究了三种不同的深度学习(DL)网络架构在考虑室内环境的射频(RF)信号分类任务中的性能。我们比较了卷积神经网络(CNN)、长短期记忆(LSTM)网络和残余网络(ResNet)架构下7种调制类型(BPSK、QPSK、GMSK、16-QAM、64-QAM、GFSK和CPFSK)的分类精度,方法是改变建筑物布局中的接收器位置以及两种不同的发射器位置。可以看出,在考虑的场景中,对于给定的发射器位置,CNN和LSTM架构根据接收器位置提供更好的分类精度。还可以看到,在某些接收器位置,某些调制类型的性能优于其他调制类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep Learning for Self-tuning of Control systems Comparison of Deep Architectures for Indoor RF Signal Classification Competitions: [3 abstracts] 2021 International Conference on Emerging Techniques in Computational Intelligence [Front matter] SDN based Cognitive Security System for Large-Scale Internet of Things using Fog Computing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1