Biomechanical Properties of Osteophytes and Non-Osteophytic Cortical Bone: A Preliminary Study

F. Xavier, S. Saha
{"title":"Biomechanical Properties of Osteophytes and Non-Osteophytic Cortical Bone: A Preliminary Study","authors":"F. Xavier, S. Saha","doi":"10.1109/SBEC.2016.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Several studies have associated the development of spinal osteophytes with disc degeneration. Others have characterized them as adaptive bone remodeling in response to unusual stress/strain. No recent study examined the microstructure and mechanical properties of osteophytes. Materials and methods: Bone tissues were harvested from eight different human cadavers. Beams (length: 24mm, width: 4mm, thickness: 2mm) from lumbar osteophytes, lumbar anterior cortices (non-osteophytic), and femoral diaphyseal cortices were tested for three-point bending and micro-hardness. The specimens were subsequently divided into two parts for material density, ash density, and histological analyses. Results: Hardness values (HV) decreased by 39% from femoral cortical to spinal osteophytic samples. The maximum load to failure for osteophytic and non-osteophytic vertebral beams was 64 and 4 Newtons (N), respectively. Material density ranged from 1.40 to 2.0g/cm3 and 1.18 to 1.70g/cm3 for cortical bone and osteophyte, respectively. Undecalcified histology showed a disorganized structure of the osteophytic osteons as compared with the regular pattern observed in femoral diaphyseal cortical bones. Conclusion: Vertebral osteophytes have higher load carrying capacity than vertebral cortical bone. However, cortical bone presents a more mature and organized microstructure than osteophytes.","PeriodicalId":196856,"journal":{"name":"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 32nd Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference (SBEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBEC.2016.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have associated the development of spinal osteophytes with disc degeneration. Others have characterized them as adaptive bone remodeling in response to unusual stress/strain. No recent study examined the microstructure and mechanical properties of osteophytes. Materials and methods: Bone tissues were harvested from eight different human cadavers. Beams (length: 24mm, width: 4mm, thickness: 2mm) from lumbar osteophytes, lumbar anterior cortices (non-osteophytic), and femoral diaphyseal cortices were tested for three-point bending and micro-hardness. The specimens were subsequently divided into two parts for material density, ash density, and histological analyses. Results: Hardness values (HV) decreased by 39% from femoral cortical to spinal osteophytic samples. The maximum load to failure for osteophytic and non-osteophytic vertebral beams was 64 and 4 Newtons (N), respectively. Material density ranged from 1.40 to 2.0g/cm3 and 1.18 to 1.70g/cm3 for cortical bone and osteophyte, respectively. Undecalcified histology showed a disorganized structure of the osteophytic osteons as compared with the regular pattern observed in femoral diaphyseal cortical bones. Conclusion: Vertebral osteophytes have higher load carrying capacity than vertebral cortical bone. However, cortical bone presents a more mature and organized microstructure than osteophytes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨赘和非骨赘皮质骨的生物力学特性:初步研究
几项研究已经将脊柱骨赘的发展与椎间盘退变联系起来。其他人将其描述为适应性骨重塑,以应对不寻常的压力/应变。最近没有研究检查骨赘的微观结构和力学性能。材料和方法:从8具不同的人体尸体上采集骨组织。从腰椎骨赘、腰椎前皮质(非骨赘)和股骨骨干皮质提取的梁(长24mm,宽4mm,厚2mm)进行三点弯曲和显微硬度测试。随后将标本分为两部分进行材料密度、灰分密度和组织学分析。结果:股骨皮质与脊柱骨生标本硬度值(HV)下降39%。骨赘和非骨赘脊柱的最大失效载荷分别为64和4牛顿(N)。皮质骨和骨赘的材料密度分别为1.40 ~ 2.0g/cm3和1.18 ~ 1.70g/cm3。与股骨骨干皮质骨的规则结构相比,未钙化组织学显示骨赘骨结构紊乱。结论:椎体骨赘比椎体皮质骨具有更高的承载能力。然而,皮质骨呈现出比骨赘更成熟和有组织的微观结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Inhibition of Bio-film Formation by Graphene-Modified Stainless Steel and Titanium Alloy for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Infection: A Comparative Study Novel Scalable Nano-and Micro-High-Aspect Ratio Structure (HARS) Biocomposites Generated under Physiological Conditions Thermal Management System for In Vitro Evalution of Circulatory Assist Devices at In Vivo Temperatures Distinguishing Motor Imagery from Motor Movement Using Phase Locking Value and Eigenvector Centrality Spin Coating of 3D Printed Cardiovascular Anatomical Models, Controlling Material Properties on Complex Shapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1