A validation procedure for fuzzy multiattribute decision making

Yu-Liang Kuo, C. Yeh, R. Chau
{"title":"A validation procedure for fuzzy multiattribute decision making","authors":"Yu-Liang Kuo, C. Yeh, R. Chau","doi":"10.1109/FUZZ.2003.1206582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fuzzy multiattribute decision making (MADM) has been widely used in ranking a finite number of decision alternatives characterized by fuzzy assessments with respect to multiple criteria. The overall utility of an alternative is obtained by aggregating the criteria weights and alternatives ratings, on which the ranking is based. However, different aggregation techniques often produce inconsistent outcomes for the same problem. This paper presents a validation procedure for examining the validity of fuzzy MADM methods, in order to assist in selecting a valid outcome for a given selection problem. The procedure uses fuzzy clustering as a basis to compare with the results from fuzzy MADM methods. A case study of the scrap metal buyer selection is conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the procedure.","PeriodicalId":212172,"journal":{"name":"The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2003. FUZZ '03.","volume":"211 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2003. FUZZ '03.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ.2003.1206582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Fuzzy multiattribute decision making (MADM) has been widely used in ranking a finite number of decision alternatives characterized by fuzzy assessments with respect to multiple criteria. The overall utility of an alternative is obtained by aggregating the criteria weights and alternatives ratings, on which the ranking is based. However, different aggregation techniques often produce inconsistent outcomes for the same problem. This paper presents a validation procedure for examining the validity of fuzzy MADM methods, in order to assist in selecting a valid outcome for a given selection problem. The procedure uses fuzzy clustering as a basis to compare with the results from fuzzy MADM methods. A case study of the scrap metal buyer selection is conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模糊多属性决策的验证程序
模糊多属性决策(MADM)被广泛应用于对有限数量的决策方案进行排序,这些决策方案以多准则的模糊评价为特征。一个备选方案的总体效用是通过汇总标准权重和备选方案评级来获得的,排名是基于这些标准权重和评级。然而,对于相同的问题,不同的聚合技术通常会产生不一致的结果。本文提出了一种验证程序,用于检查模糊MADM方法的有效性,以帮助选择给定选择问题的有效结果。该程序以模糊聚类为基础,与模糊MADM方法的结果进行比较。最后以废金属买家选择为例,论证了该程序的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fuzzy flow-shop scheduling models based on credibility measure Morphological perceptrons with dendritic structure A validation procedure for fuzzy multiattribute decision making Context dependent information aggregation Traffic engineering with MPLS using fuzzy logic for application in IP networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1