TSCH and 6TiSCH for Contiki: Challenges, Design and Evaluation

S. Duquennoy, Atis Elsts, Beshr Al Nahas, G. Oikonomou
{"title":"TSCH and 6TiSCH for Contiki: Challenges, Design and Evaluation","authors":"S. Duquennoy, Atis Elsts, Beshr Al Nahas, G. Oikonomou","doi":"10.1109/DCOSS.2017.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synchronized communication has recently emerged as a prime option for low-power critical applications. Solutions such as Glossy or Time Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) have demonstrated end-to-end reliability upwards of 99.99%. In this context, the IETF Working Group 6TiSCH is currently standardizing the mechanisms to use TSCH in low-power IPv6 scenarios. This paper identifies a number of challenges when it comes to implementing the 6TiSCH stack. It shows how these challenges can be addressed with practical solutions for locking, queuing, scheduling and other aspects. With this implementation as an enabler, we present an experimental validation and comparison with state-of-the-art MAC protocols. We conduct fine-grained energy profiling, showing the impact of link-layer security on packet transmission. We evaluate distributed time synchronization in a 340-node testbed, and demonstrate that tight synchronization (hundreds of microseconds) can be achieved at very low cost (0.3% duty cycle, 0.008% channel utilization). We finally compare TSCH against traditional MAC layers: low-power listening (LPL) and CSMA, in terms of reliability, latency and energy. We show that with proper scheduling, TSCH achieves by far the highest reliability, and outperforms LPL in both energy and latency.","PeriodicalId":399222,"journal":{"name":"2017 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"104","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DCOSS.2017.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

Abstract

Synchronized communication has recently emerged as a prime option for low-power critical applications. Solutions such as Glossy or Time Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) have demonstrated end-to-end reliability upwards of 99.99%. In this context, the IETF Working Group 6TiSCH is currently standardizing the mechanisms to use TSCH in low-power IPv6 scenarios. This paper identifies a number of challenges when it comes to implementing the 6TiSCH stack. It shows how these challenges can be addressed with practical solutions for locking, queuing, scheduling and other aspects. With this implementation as an enabler, we present an experimental validation and comparison with state-of-the-art MAC protocols. We conduct fine-grained energy profiling, showing the impact of link-layer security on packet transmission. We evaluate distributed time synchronization in a 340-node testbed, and demonstrate that tight synchronization (hundreds of microseconds) can be achieved at very low cost (0.3% duty cycle, 0.008% channel utilization). We finally compare TSCH against traditional MAC layers: low-power listening (LPL) and CSMA, in terms of reliability, latency and energy. We show that with proper scheduling, TSCH achieves by far the highest reliability, and outperforms LPL in both energy and latency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
contki的TSCH和6TiSCH:挑战、设计和评估
同步通信最近成为低功耗关键应用程序的主要选择。诸如平滑或时隙信道跳频(TSCH)等解决方案已经证明端到端可靠性高达99.99%。在这种情况下,IETF 6TiSCH工作组目前正在标准化在低功耗IPv6场景中使用TSCH的机制。本文指出了在实现6TiSCH堆栈时面临的一些挑战。它展示了如何使用锁、排队、调度和其他方面的实用解决方案来解决这些挑战。有了这个实现作为使能器,我们提出了一个实验验证和与最先进的MAC协议的比较。我们进行了细粒度的能量分析,显示了链路层安全性对数据包传输的影响。我们在340个节点的试验台中评估了分布式时间同步,并证明了紧密同步(数百微秒)可以以非常低的成本(0.3%占空比,0.008%信道利用率)实现。最后,我们将TSCH与传统的MAC层:低功耗监听(LPL)和CSMA在可靠性、延迟和能量方面进行了比较。我们表明,通过适当的调度,TSCH实现了迄今为止最高的可靠性,并且在能量和延迟方面都优于LPL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel WSN Hardware for Long Range Low Power Monitoring Traffic Event Detection Using Online Social Networks TSCH and 6TiSCH for Contiki: Challenges, Design and Evaluation Measuring People-Flow through Doorways Using Easy-to-Install IR Array Sensors Towards more Realistic Models for Wireless Power Transfer Algorithm Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1