An Empirical Comparison of Graph Databases

Salim Jouili, Valentin Vansteenberghe
{"title":"An Empirical Comparison of Graph Databases","authors":"Salim Jouili, Valentin Vansteenberghe","doi":"10.1109/SocialCom.2013.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, more and more companies provide services that can not be anymore achieved efficiently using relational databases. As such, these companies are forced to use alternative database models such as XML databases, object-oriented databases, document-oriented databases and, more recently graph databases. Graph databases only exist for a few years. Although there have been some comparison attempts, they are mostly focused on certain aspects only. In this paper, we present a distributed graph database comparison framework and the results we obtained by comparing four important players in the graph databases market: Neo4j, Orient DB, Titan and DEX.","PeriodicalId":129308,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Social Computing","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"142","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Social Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 142

Abstract

In recent years, more and more companies provide services that can not be anymore achieved efficiently using relational databases. As such, these companies are forced to use alternative database models such as XML databases, object-oriented databases, document-oriented databases and, more recently graph databases. Graph databases only exist for a few years. Although there have been some comparison attempts, they are mostly focused on certain aspects only. In this paper, we present a distributed graph database comparison framework and the results we obtained by comparing four important players in the graph databases market: Neo4j, Orient DB, Titan and DEX.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图形数据库的实证比较
近年来,越来越多的企业所提供的服务已经无法通过关系数据库高效地实现。因此,这些公司被迫使用其他数据库模型,如XML数据库、面向对象的数据库、面向文档的数据库以及最近的图形数据库。图形数据库只存在了几年。虽然有一些比较的尝试,但它们大多只集中在某些方面。在本文中,我们提出了一个分布式图数据库比较框架,并通过比较图数据库市场上的四个重要参与者:Neo4j, Orient DB, Titan和DEX得出了我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Novel Group Recommendation Algorithm with Collaborative Filtering Access Control Policy Extraction from Unconstrained Natural Language Text Stock Market Manipulation Using Cyberattacks Together with Misinformation Disseminated through Social Media Friendship Prediction on Social Network Users An Empirical Comparison of Graph Databases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1