The Role of Engineering Critical Assessment in the Life Extension of Risers Connected to Floating Systems

B. Mekha, R. Gordon
{"title":"The Role of Engineering Critical Assessment in the Life Extension of Risers Connected to Floating Systems","authors":"B. Mekha, R. Gordon","doi":"10.1115/omae2020-19085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As many offshore production systems approach the end of their original Design Life, Operators are faced with the choice of either decommissioning or demonstrating that the original Design Life can be extended (Life Extension). Life extension requires the Operator to perform detailed engineering analyses to verify that the system can be operated safely over the period of Life Extension. In many cases this requires detailed fatigue analysis and inspection programs to demonstrate that original fabrication flaws or fatigue cracks that may have existed during the welding of the riser joints or initiated over the original Design Life will not grow to a critical size resulting in failure.\n Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA) is now routinely applied in the design and fabrication of new offshore riser systems to develop girth weld flaw acceptance criteria. The resulting flaw acceptance criteria ensure that fabrication flaws will not extend to a critical size over the Design Life and thus the riser still meet its calculated fatigue life. Although ECA procedures for new construction are well established and standard practices have been adopted throughout the industry, ECA procedures for Life Extension have not yet evolved to the same level of acceptance.\n This paper will review specific issues associated with applying ECA to support Life Extension of offshore Riser Systems. The paper will provide the overall ECA philosophy and methodology for life extension to be adopted for the historical (hindcast or Phase 1) and future (forecast or Phase 2) analysis of the risers. Some thoughts will also be given to the approach implemented to take advantage of the actual weld fabrication data with the focus on the fatigue critical sections of the risers. Finally, the paper will address the requirements for riser in-situ inspection and how the results could be analyzed and applied to the life extension analysis in conjunction with the ECA analysis.","PeriodicalId":240325,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2020-19085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As many offshore production systems approach the end of their original Design Life, Operators are faced with the choice of either decommissioning or demonstrating that the original Design Life can be extended (Life Extension). Life extension requires the Operator to perform detailed engineering analyses to verify that the system can be operated safely over the period of Life Extension. In many cases this requires detailed fatigue analysis and inspection programs to demonstrate that original fabrication flaws or fatigue cracks that may have existed during the welding of the riser joints or initiated over the original Design Life will not grow to a critical size resulting in failure. Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA) is now routinely applied in the design and fabrication of new offshore riser systems to develop girth weld flaw acceptance criteria. The resulting flaw acceptance criteria ensure that fabrication flaws will not extend to a critical size over the Design Life and thus the riser still meet its calculated fatigue life. Although ECA procedures for new construction are well established and standard practices have been adopted throughout the industry, ECA procedures for Life Extension have not yet evolved to the same level of acceptance. This paper will review specific issues associated with applying ECA to support Life Extension of offshore Riser Systems. The paper will provide the overall ECA philosophy and methodology for life extension to be adopted for the historical (hindcast or Phase 1) and future (forecast or Phase 2) analysis of the risers. Some thoughts will also be given to the approach implemented to take advantage of the actual weld fabrication data with the focus on the fatigue critical sections of the risers. Finally, the paper will address the requirements for riser in-situ inspection and how the results could be analyzed and applied to the life extension analysis in conjunction with the ECA analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程关键评估在延长与浮式系统相连的隔水管寿命中的作用
随着许多海上生产系统接近其原始设计寿命,运营商面临着退役或证明原始设计寿命可以延长(Life Extension)的选择。延长使用寿命要求作业者进行详细的工程分析,以验证系统在延长使用寿命期间可以安全运行。在许多情况下,这需要详细的疲劳分析和检查程序,以证明可能在立管接头焊接期间存在的原始制造缺陷或疲劳裂纹,或在原始设计寿命期间产生的裂纹,不会增长到导致失效的临界尺寸。工程关键评估(ECA)现在通常应用于新型海上隔水管系统的设计和制造,以制定环焊缝缺陷验收标准。由此产生的缺陷接受标准确保制造缺陷在设计寿命内不会扩展到临界尺寸,因此立管仍然满足其计算疲劳寿命。虽然新建筑的ECA程序已经确立,整个行业也采用了标准做法,但延长寿命的ECA程序尚未发展到同样的接受水平。本文将回顾与应用ECA支持海上立管系统寿命延长相关的具体问题。本文将为立管的历史(预测或第一阶段)和未来(预测或第二阶段)分析提供总体的ECA哲学和延长寿命的方法。本文还将考虑利用实际焊接制造数据的方法,重点关注立管的疲劳临界截面。最后,本文将讨论立管原位检测的要求,以及如何分析结果并将其应用于与ECA分析相结合的寿命延长分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrity Monitoring of Offshore Arctic Pipelines Investigation of Near-Field Temperature Distribution in Buried Dense Phase CO2 Pipelines On the Plastic Bending Responses of Dented Lined Pipe Implementation of a Method for Free-Spanning Pipeline Analysis Simplified Stochastic Modelling of the Force on a Pipe Bend Due to Two-Phase Slug Flow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1