Effect of Pod Sucking Bugs (Hemiptera: Coreidae, Alydidaei Infestation on Yield of Intercropped Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in Maiduguri, Nigeria.

U. Zakka, B. M. Sastawa, N. Lale
{"title":"Effect of Pod Sucking Bugs (Hemiptera: Coreidae, Alydidaei Infestation on Yield of Intercropped Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in Maiduguri, Nigeria.","authors":"U. Zakka, B. M. Sastawa, N. Lale","doi":"10.36108/nje/9002/62.0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was carried out at the University of Maiduguri Teaching and Research Farm to assess damage caused by pod sucking bugs [Anoplocnemis curvipes (Fab.), Cluvigralla shadabi Doll., C. tomentosicollis Stall, Riptortus dentipes (Fab.), Mirperusjaculus (Thun.), and Nezara viridula L.] on cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] between Jul. and Nov. 2002. Treatments were set up as 4x3x2 factorial arrangement in a strip-split design with planting date (Jul.3 1. Aug. 7. 14 and 21 ) as the main plot factor. cropping pattern of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucutn (L.) R. Br.] and cowpea (3: 1: 2: 1: 1: 1) as subplot factor, and cropping system (millet-cowpea and millet-cowpea-soybean-groundnut intercrop) as sub-subplot factor. Results for planting date showed that the number of bugs/plant and percentage pod damage were significantly lower (P<0.05) while pod yield/plant was significantly higher for the cowpea planted on Jul. 31 compared with those planted on other dates. There were significantly (P<0.05) fewer numbers of bugs/plant for the 2: 1 cropping pattern, lower percentage pod damage for the I: 1 cropping pattern. and higher pod yield/plant for the 3: 1 cropping pattern. For the cropping system. millet-cowpea-groundnut-soybcan had lower number of bugs/plant and higher pod yield/plant than the millet-cowpea cropping system. Planting cowpea early in the season using the cropping pattern 3: 1 in conjunction with the millet-cowpea-groundnut soybean cropping system offered a more effective means of escaping from the yield-depressing effect of pod-sucking bug infestation.","PeriodicalId":183712,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Entomology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36108/nje/9002/62.0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An experiment was carried out at the University of Maiduguri Teaching and Research Farm to assess damage caused by pod sucking bugs [Anoplocnemis curvipes (Fab.), Cluvigralla shadabi Doll., C. tomentosicollis Stall, Riptortus dentipes (Fab.), Mirperusjaculus (Thun.), and Nezara viridula L.] on cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] between Jul. and Nov. 2002. Treatments were set up as 4x3x2 factorial arrangement in a strip-split design with planting date (Jul.3 1. Aug. 7. 14 and 21 ) as the main plot factor. cropping pattern of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucutn (L.) R. Br.] and cowpea (3: 1: 2: 1: 1: 1) as subplot factor, and cropping system (millet-cowpea and millet-cowpea-soybean-groundnut intercrop) as sub-subplot factor. Results for planting date showed that the number of bugs/plant and percentage pod damage were significantly lower (P<0.05) while pod yield/plant was significantly higher for the cowpea planted on Jul. 31 compared with those planted on other dates. There were significantly (P<0.05) fewer numbers of bugs/plant for the 2: 1 cropping pattern, lower percentage pod damage for the I: 1 cropping pattern. and higher pod yield/plant for the 3: 1 cropping pattern. For the cropping system. millet-cowpea-groundnut-soybcan had lower number of bugs/plant and higher pod yield/plant than the millet-cowpea cropping system. Planting cowpea early in the season using the cropping pattern 3: 1 in conjunction with the millet-cowpea-groundnut soybean cropping system offered a more effective means of escaping from the yield-depressing effect of pod-sucking bug infestation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸荚虫对间作豇豆(Vigna unguiculata)产量的影响Walp。在尼日利亚的迈杜古里。
在迈杜古里大学教学和研究农场进行了一项实验,以评估豆荚吸虫[Anoplocnemis curvipes (Fab.), Cluvigralla shadabi Doll]造成的损害。[C. tomentosicollis Stall, ritortus dentipes (Fab.), Mirperusjaculus (Thun.)和Nezara viridula L.]在豇豆上[Vigna unguiculata (L.)]Walp。在2002年7月至11月期间。各处理按4 × 3 × 2因子设计,植期为7月31日。8月7日。14和21)作为主要情节因素。珍珠粟(Pennisetum glaucutn, L.)的种植模式r . Br。[3: 1: 2: 1: 1]和豇豆(3:1:2:1:1)为子小区因子,种植制度(谷子-豇豆和谷子-豇豆-大豆-花生间作)为子小区因子。结果表明:7月31日播种的豇豆虫数/株和荚果损失率显著低于其他播种日期(P<0.05),荚果产量显著高于其他播种日期。2∶1种植模式的虫数/株显著低于(P<0.05), 1∶1种植模式的荚果损伤率显著低于(P<0.05)。3:1种植模式的单株荚果产量更高。对于种植系统。小米-豇豆-花生-大豆种植体系的单株虫数和单株荚果产量均低于小米-豇豆种植体系。采用“3:1”种植模式在种植季节早期种植豇豆,与“小米-豇豆-花生大豆”种植系统相结合,可以更有效地摆脱吸荚虫的减产影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Field Evaluation of the Efficacy of some Plant Oils for the Management of Aphis craccivora (Koch) Morphotaxonomic Studies and Abundance of Simulium damnosumTheobald (Diptera: Simuliidae) Complex in Two Local Government Areas of Ogun State Proximate Composition and Consumers’ Perceptions on Grasshopper (Zonocerus variegatus) Consumption in Kano State Metropolis, Nigeria Assessment of Beetles Diversity and Abundance in Forest Edge and Grassland Ecosystems of Ngel-Nyaki Forest Reserve Toxicities of Desert Dates and Moringa Seeds Essential Oils on Helicoverpa armigera Hub (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Larvae under Laboratory conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1