CEO Political Ideology and Audit Pricing

Wang Dong, Shuo Li, Hong Xie, Yu Zhang
{"title":"CEO Political Ideology and Audit Pricing","authors":"Wang Dong, Shuo Li, Hong Xie, Yu Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3246551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the association between CEOs’ political ideologies, proxied by CEOs’ federal-level personal political contributions to the Republican Party relative to the Democratic Party, and audit fees of the firms that the CEOs manage. We hypothesize and find that firms run by CEOs whose political ideologies are aligned with the Republican Party pay lower audit fees than firms run by CEOs whose political ideologies are aligned with the Democratic Party. This finding is robust to various sensitivity checks and to controls for potential endogeneity and self-selection concerns. In addition, we find that CEO political ideology affects audit risk as proxied by financial reporting quality and client business risk, which, in turn, influence audit fees, suggesting that financial reporting quality and client business risk are two channels through which CEO political ideology affects audit fees. Finally, we find that the association between CEO political ideology and audit fees is more pronounced when corporate governance is weaker. Overall, our results suggest that CEO political ideology is a factor that influences audit risk and auditors incorporate such a factor in their audit pricing decisions.","PeriodicalId":223724,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Cognition","volume":"208 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3246551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We examine the association between CEOs’ political ideologies, proxied by CEOs’ federal-level personal political contributions to the Republican Party relative to the Democratic Party, and audit fees of the firms that the CEOs manage. We hypothesize and find that firms run by CEOs whose political ideologies are aligned with the Republican Party pay lower audit fees than firms run by CEOs whose political ideologies are aligned with the Democratic Party. This finding is robust to various sensitivity checks and to controls for potential endogeneity and self-selection concerns. In addition, we find that CEO political ideology affects audit risk as proxied by financial reporting quality and client business risk, which, in turn, influence audit fees, suggesting that financial reporting quality and client business risk are two channels through which CEO political ideology affects audit fees. Finally, we find that the association between CEO political ideology and audit fees is more pronounced when corporate governance is weaker. Overall, our results suggest that CEO political ideology is a factor that influences audit risk and auditors incorporate such a factor in their audit pricing decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CEO政治意识形态与审计定价
我们考察了首席执行官的政治意识形态(以首席执行官对共和党相对于民主党的联邦级个人政治献金为代表)与首席执行官所管理的公司的审计费用之间的关系。我们假设并发现,政治意识形态与共和党一致的首席执行官所经营的公司比政治意识形态与民主党一致的首席执行官所经营的公司支付的审计费用更低。这一发现是稳健的各种敏感性检查和控制潜在的内生性和自我选择的关注。此外,我们发现CEO政治意识形态通过财务报告质量和客户业务风险影响审计风险,进而影响审计费用,表明财务报告质量和客户业务风险是CEO政治意识形态影响审计费用的两个渠道。最后,我们发现当公司治理较弱时,CEO政治意识形态与审计费用之间的关联更为明显。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,CEO的政治意识形态是影响审计风险的一个因素,审计师将这一因素纳入其审计定价决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Activists as Free-Riders: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment How Self-Respect and Self Esteem affect wellbeing and health: The serial mediation of happiness, and job satisfaction, complemented by Self-Efficacy Fear and Favoritism in the Time of COVID-19 Fire Alarm Fatigue: How Politicians Evade Accountability Trust to the Scientists: Intention to Complete the 2021 Census in England and Wales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1