Social Comparisons in Real Time: A Field Experiment of Residential Electricity and Water Use

A. Kažukauskas, Thomas Broberg, J. Jaraitė
{"title":"Social Comparisons in Real Time: A Field Experiment of Residential Electricity and Water Use","authors":"A. Kažukauskas, Thomas Broberg, J. Jaraitė","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3075938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large body of literature shows that the provision of social comparisons can cause households to reduce residential energy and water use. In this paper, we carry out a field experiment that contributes to this literature in two important ways. First, we study a social comparison treatment that is continuous and communicated via pre-installed in-home displays, which are salient and updated in real time. Second, we estimate the effects of provision of social comparisons on two distinguished resources – electricity and water – in the same experimental setting. We find that, on average, our social comparison reduces daily residential energy consumption by 6.7 percent but has no effect on overall residential water use. The electricity savings are impersistent and occur in the evening hours, which only slightly overlap with peak hours. We argue that electricity conservation due to social comparisons is driven by short-run changes in households’ electricity saving behavior.","PeriodicalId":126680,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Product Demand Issues (Topic)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Product Demand Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3075938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

A large body of literature shows that the provision of social comparisons can cause households to reduce residential energy and water use. In this paper, we carry out a field experiment that contributes to this literature in two important ways. First, we study a social comparison treatment that is continuous and communicated via pre-installed in-home displays, which are salient and updated in real time. Second, we estimate the effects of provision of social comparisons on two distinguished resources – electricity and water – in the same experimental setting. We find that, on average, our social comparison reduces daily residential energy consumption by 6.7 percent but has no effect on overall residential water use. The electricity savings are impersistent and occur in the evening hours, which only slightly overlap with peak hours. We argue that electricity conservation due to social comparisons is driven by short-run changes in households’ electricity saving behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时社会比较:住宅水电使用的现场实验
大量文献表明,提供社会比较可以导致家庭减少住宅能源和水的使用。在本文中,我们进行了一个实地实验,在两个重要的方面有助于这一文献。首先,我们研究了一种社会比较处理,它是连续的,并通过预装在家里的显示器进行交流,这是显著的和实时更新的。其次,我们估计了在相同的实验环境中,提供社会比较对两种不同资源(电和水)的影响。我们发现,平均而言,我们的社会比较减少了6.7%的日常住宅能源消耗,但对总体住宅用水没有影响。节电是不持久的,只发生在晚上,与高峰时间略有重叠。我们认为,由于社会比较而产生的节电是由家庭节电行为的短期变化驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Retailing Analysis of the Drivers of Ghana's Energy Demand Change Using the Laspeyres Index Method of Decomposition: Q‐Effect, I‐Effect and S‐Effect Social Comparisons in Real Time: A Field Experiment of Residential Electricity and Water Use Determinants of Improved Waste Management Services in Delhi: An Economic Valuation Harvesting the Low-Hanging Fruit: A Behavioural Study of Energy-Efficient Household Appliance Purchases in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1