{"title":"Towards a Hylomorphic Solution to the Grounding Problem","authors":"K. Koslicki","doi":"10.1017/S1358246118000127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Concrete particular objects (e.g. living organisms) figure saliently in our everyday experience as well as our in our scientific theorizing about the world. A hylomorphic analysis of concrete particular objects holds that these entities are, in some sense, compounds of matter (hūlē) and form (morphē or eidos). The Grounding Problem asks why an object and its matter (e.g. a statue and the clay that constitutes it) can apparently differ with respect to certain of their properties (e.g. the clay's ability to survive being squashed, as compared to the statue's inability to do so), even though they are otherwise so much alike. In this paper, I argue that a hylomorphic analysis of concrete particular objects, in conjunction with a non-modal conception of essence of the type encountered for example in the works of Aristotle and Kit Fine, has the resources to yield a solution to the Grounding Problem.","PeriodicalId":269662,"journal":{"name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246118000127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Abstract Concrete particular objects (e.g. living organisms) figure saliently in our everyday experience as well as our in our scientific theorizing about the world. A hylomorphic analysis of concrete particular objects holds that these entities are, in some sense, compounds of matter (hūlē) and form (morphē or eidos). The Grounding Problem asks why an object and its matter (e.g. a statue and the clay that constitutes it) can apparently differ with respect to certain of their properties (e.g. the clay's ability to survive being squashed, as compared to the statue's inability to do so), even though they are otherwise so much alike. In this paper, I argue that a hylomorphic analysis of concrete particular objects, in conjunction with a non-modal conception of essence of the type encountered for example in the works of Aristotle and Kit Fine, has the resources to yield a solution to the Grounding Problem.
具体的特定对象(如生物体)在我们的日常经验中以及在我们关于世界的科学理论中都占有显著的地位。对具体的特定物体的词形分析认为,这些实体在某种意义上是物质(hūlē)和形式(morphi or eidos)的化合物。接地问题问的是,为什么一个物体和它的物质(例如,雕像和构成雕像的粘土)在某些属性上明显不同(例如,粘土能被压扁,而雕像却不能),尽管它们在其他方面是如此相似。在本文中,我认为,对具体的特定对象的同态分析,结合亚里士多德和Kit Fine的作品中遇到的类型本质的非模态概念,可以提供解决接地问题的资源。