An Analytical Study on Trustability of Prescribed Slope Inclinations in Design Criteria

Seung-Hyun Lee, Byoung-il Kim, Man-Soo Lee
{"title":"An Analytical Study on Trustability of Prescribed Slope Inclinations in Design Criteria","authors":"Seung-Hyun Lee, Byoung-il Kim, Man-Soo Lee","doi":"10.20481/kscdp.2022.9.4.231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to investigate trustability of prescribed slope inclinations in design criteria, slope stability analyses were performed on the assumed two embankment sections. Factors of safety against dry condition for the section of 10m high and slope inclination of 1:2 and for the other section of 5m high and slope inclination of 1:1.5 were 1.93 and 2.24 respectively and those values were greater than the design criterion value of 1.50. Factors of safety which were computed through seepage analyses for steady state condition were 1.59 for the section of 10m high and 1.93 for the other section and those values were greater than design criterion value of 1.30. Non-steady state analyses under the same rainfall intensity for the steady state condition were also performed to compare with steady state analyses and it can be seen that factor of safety for the non-steady state condition was converged to the value for the steady state condition as time elapsed. Stability analyses of using piezometric line which were located on the top line of the sections were performed and computed values of factor of safety were 1.20 for the section of 10m high and 1.59 for the other section respectively and it could be seen that the factor of safety for the section of 10m is less than the criterion value of 1.30. According to the results of this study, it can be seen that the slope inclination of 1:1.5 for the slope heights less than 5m and the slope inclination of 1:2.0 for the slope heights between 5m to 10m were safe enough under dry condition and rainfall condition. Nevertheless it can be concluded that slope stability analysis should be performed for the slope over 10m high and with ground water table near the surface of the slope because the factor of safety for that situation was less than the design criterion value.","PeriodicalId":326564,"journal":{"name":"Korea Society of Coastal Disaster Prevention","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Society of Coastal Disaster Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20481/kscdp.2022.9.4.231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to investigate trustability of prescribed slope inclinations in design criteria, slope stability analyses were performed on the assumed two embankment sections. Factors of safety against dry condition for the section of 10m high and slope inclination of 1:2 and for the other section of 5m high and slope inclination of 1:1.5 were 1.93 and 2.24 respectively and those values were greater than the design criterion value of 1.50. Factors of safety which were computed through seepage analyses for steady state condition were 1.59 for the section of 10m high and 1.93 for the other section and those values were greater than design criterion value of 1.30. Non-steady state analyses under the same rainfall intensity for the steady state condition were also performed to compare with steady state analyses and it can be seen that factor of safety for the non-steady state condition was converged to the value for the steady state condition as time elapsed. Stability analyses of using piezometric line which were located on the top line of the sections were performed and computed values of factor of safety were 1.20 for the section of 10m high and 1.59 for the other section respectively and it could be seen that the factor of safety for the section of 10m is less than the criterion value of 1.30. According to the results of this study, it can be seen that the slope inclination of 1:1.5 for the slope heights less than 5m and the slope inclination of 1:2.0 for the slope heights between 5m to 10m were safe enough under dry condition and rainfall condition. Nevertheless it can be concluded that slope stability analysis should be performed for the slope over 10m high and with ground water table near the surface of the slope because the factor of safety for that situation was less than the design criterion value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计准则中规定坡度可信度的分析研究
为了探讨设计准则中规定的边坡倾角的可靠性,对假设的两个路堤断面进行了边坡稳定性分析。10m高、坡度为1:2的断面和5m高、坡度为1:1.5的断面的抗干安全系数分别为1.93和2.24,均大于设计标准值1.50。稳定状态下渗流分析计算的安全系数10m高段为1.59,10m高段为1.93,均大于设计标准值1.30。在相同降雨强度下,对稳态条件进行了非稳态分析,与稳态分析进行了比较,可以看出,随着时间的推移,非稳态条件下的安全系数收敛于稳态条件下的值。采用位于断面顶线的测压线进行稳定性分析,10m高段的安全系数计算值为1.20,其余10m高段的安全系数计算值为1.59,可见10m高段的安全系数小于规范值1.30。从本研究结果可以看出,在干燥条件和降雨条件下,当坡高小于5m时,坡度坡度为1:1.5,当坡高在5m ~ 10m时,坡度坡度为1:2.0是足够安全的。但可以得出结论,当边坡高度大于10m且地下水位接近地表时,安全系数小于设计标准值,应进行边坡稳定性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Increasing Flow Velocity and Improving Water Quality in Dongsam Seawater Stream through Bi-directional Sluice Gates Operation and Tidal Range Drainage Analysis of the Navigation Criteria of Passing Vessel for the Mooring Safety in Adjacent Berth to the Fairway Formulation of Anchor and Chain Specifications for Establishing Subsea Cable Burial Depth Fundamental Study on the Application of Oyster Shell as an Aggregate for Concrete in Coastal/Marine Structures Holding Capacity of Suction Anchor in Cohesive Soils based on Soil-Spring Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1