{"title":"Sport","authors":"Percy Hughes","doi":"10.1086/intejethi.47.4.2989371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AS WE turn the pages of a well-planned newspaper we see that in modern life certain activities are so segregated as to achieve some measure of autotelic and autonomous organization: for instance, medicine, religion, industry, art, science, government, education, sport, etc. In democratic societies these segregations are more complete, at least in the negative sense that no external influence presumes in general to dictate. \"Sport,\" for example, goes its way with but sporadic interference from medicine, education, religion, or government. But at present, within each such field of segregation, one finds little positive insight into the whole range of the activities that are involved, and of the several distinct, indispensable factors that enter into the situation, of which each calls for development peculiar to itself. So we see that in religion, beside the religion of the \"churches,\" we must recognize that secular, political, and theocratic religion all enter into every concrete situation where a religious problem arises.' Failure to recognize this essential manifoldness of the religious problem gives rise to moralizing and contention rather than to fresh vision and inspired achievement. Similarly in matters of sport we see a round condemnation of procedures in one phase of sport in terms of criteria applicable only to another; while there is lacking such broad and discriminating cultivation of sport in all its phases as most diversifies, invigorates, and gladdens life. Surveys of each such field of segregated activities are one chief function of ethical study, so that in making a practical decision we may do so with some vision of the entire field within which that decision will produce effects. All such segregations do indeed interact, and a broader survey will bring this interaction into clearer view. First, however, we need more adequate surveys than we now have of each segregation, for the purpose of winning for every indispensable factor therein due recognition and full development. In every such segregation we must first appreciate that factor of feeling","PeriodicalId":346392,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Ethics","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1937-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/intejethi.47.4.2989371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AS WE turn the pages of a well-planned newspaper we see that in modern life certain activities are so segregated as to achieve some measure of autotelic and autonomous organization: for instance, medicine, religion, industry, art, science, government, education, sport, etc. In democratic societies these segregations are more complete, at least in the negative sense that no external influence presumes in general to dictate. "Sport," for example, goes its way with but sporadic interference from medicine, education, religion, or government. But at present, within each such field of segregation, one finds little positive insight into the whole range of the activities that are involved, and of the several distinct, indispensable factors that enter into the situation, of which each calls for development peculiar to itself. So we see that in religion, beside the religion of the "churches," we must recognize that secular, political, and theocratic religion all enter into every concrete situation where a religious problem arises.' Failure to recognize this essential manifoldness of the religious problem gives rise to moralizing and contention rather than to fresh vision and inspired achievement. Similarly in matters of sport we see a round condemnation of procedures in one phase of sport in terms of criteria applicable only to another; while there is lacking such broad and discriminating cultivation of sport in all its phases as most diversifies, invigorates, and gladdens life. Surveys of each such field of segregated activities are one chief function of ethical study, so that in making a practical decision we may do so with some vision of the entire field within which that decision will produce effects. All such segregations do indeed interact, and a broader survey will bring this interaction into clearer view. First, however, we need more adequate surveys than we now have of each segregation, for the purpose of winning for every indispensable factor therein due recognition and full development. In every such segregation we must first appreciate that factor of feeling
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育运动
当我们翻阅一份精心策划的报纸时,我们会看到,在现代生活中,某些活动是如此分离,以至于达到了某种程度上的自动和自主的组织:例如,医学、宗教、工业、艺术、科学、政府、教育、体育等。在民主社会中,这种隔离更为彻底,至少从消极的意义上说,没有外部影响可以普遍支配。例如,“体育运动”的发展只受到医学、教育、宗教或政府的零星干预。但目前,在每一个这样的隔离领域中,人们发现对所涉及的活动的整个范围,以及对进入这种情况的几个独特的、不可或缺的因素,几乎没有积极的见解,每个因素都需要自己特有的发展。因此,我们看到,在宗教方面,除了“教会”的宗教之外,我们必须承认,世俗宗教、政治宗教和神权宗教都进入到每一个出现宗教问题的具体情况中。如果不能认识到宗教问题的这种本质的多样性,就会产生道德说教和争论,而不是产生新的视野和鼓舞人心的成就。同样地,在体育运动中,我们看到在体育运动的一个阶段中,人们用只适用于另一个阶段的标准来谴责程序;虽然在各个阶段都缺乏广泛和有区别的体育培养,因为大多数体育使生活多样化,充满活力和快乐。对每一个这样的隔离活动领域进行调查是伦理研究的一个主要功能,因此,在做出实际决定时,我们可以对该决定将在其中产生影响的整个领域有所了解。所有这些种族隔离确实相互作用,更广泛的调查将使这种相互作用更清晰。然而,首先,我们需要比现在对每一种种族隔离进行更充分的调查,以便使其中每一个不可或缺的因素得到应有的承认和充分的发展。在每一种这样的隔离中,我们必须首先认识到感情的因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mastery learning of toxicology life support skills by nurses and doctors, utilizing simulation technology in Nepal Role of Forensic Nurses in the mortuary and postmortem examination An overview of sexual assault cases in Bangladesh Risks, hazards and safety in mortuaries Nut case in ER: ISTOLS Toxidromal Approach by Indian Society of Toxicology in managing botanical emergencies due to Areca Catechu - Betel Nuts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1