The Evaluation of Frequency of Intracranial Haemorrhage in Patients of Head Trauma with GCS 10-15 on Computed Tomography Scan

Nazeeha Waseem, A. Akhtar, Kainat Saleem, Saleha Liaqat, Umair Waqas
{"title":"The Evaluation of Frequency of Intracranial Haemorrhage in Patients of Head Trauma with GCS 10-15 on Computed Tomography Scan","authors":"Nazeeha Waseem, A. Akhtar, Kainat Saleem, Saleha Liaqat, Umair Waqas","doi":"10.36349/EASJMS.2020.V02I11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quick Response Code Abstract: Traumatic head injuries are a prominent cause of death. The privilege of intracranial hemorrhage is one of the fatal problems. CT-scan is considered the gold standard for the traumatic brain injuries diagnosis. GCS of the patients is helpful in patient evaluation. Patient with high GCS are neglected but it may be considered that they can develop significant problems. However, it is controversial whether to perform CT-scan in patients that have 13-15 GCS or not. Purpose: I hereby to evaluate the patients of head trauma with high GCS 10-15 on CT-scan that may be neglected but they may develop symptoms. My aim of study was to determine whether it is safe to discharge such patients or performing CT scan is safe. Besides this, I mainly found the frequency of different types of ICH in 50 patients that have 10-15 GCS. Approach: 50 patients of head trauma injuries were evaluated on computed tomography. All the patients had undergone non-contrast computed tomography scan of brain with the axial images and slice thickness of 5mm from foramen magnum to vertex. A Performa was filled for patient’s name, age, gender and other findings. Any statistical variables were correct by putting some exclusion criteria i.e. bleeding disorder and anti-coagulant therapy so that it might not influence the desired conclusions. Results: Out of 50 patients 22 (44.00%) patients had intracranial hemorrhage. Out of these 22 patients 9 (40.91%) had EDH, 9 (40.91%) had subdural, 2 (9.09%) had SAH and 2 (9.09%) had ICrH. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the frequency of ICH is 44% and the incidence of SDH and EDH is equally higher than other types. Patients with RTA have higher risk of ICH and it is more in females than in males. Data analysis for different variables was done by using Microsoft excel 365. Graphs and charts were used to explain the results.","PeriodicalId":446681,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/EASJMS.2020.V02I11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Quick Response Code Abstract: Traumatic head injuries are a prominent cause of death. The privilege of intracranial hemorrhage is one of the fatal problems. CT-scan is considered the gold standard for the traumatic brain injuries diagnosis. GCS of the patients is helpful in patient evaluation. Patient with high GCS are neglected but it may be considered that they can develop significant problems. However, it is controversial whether to perform CT-scan in patients that have 13-15 GCS or not. Purpose: I hereby to evaluate the patients of head trauma with high GCS 10-15 on CT-scan that may be neglected but they may develop symptoms. My aim of study was to determine whether it is safe to discharge such patients or performing CT scan is safe. Besides this, I mainly found the frequency of different types of ICH in 50 patients that have 10-15 GCS. Approach: 50 patients of head trauma injuries were evaluated on computed tomography. All the patients had undergone non-contrast computed tomography scan of brain with the axial images and slice thickness of 5mm from foramen magnum to vertex. A Performa was filled for patient’s name, age, gender and other findings. Any statistical variables were correct by putting some exclusion criteria i.e. bleeding disorder and anti-coagulant therapy so that it might not influence the desired conclusions. Results: Out of 50 patients 22 (44.00%) patients had intracranial hemorrhage. Out of these 22 patients 9 (40.91%) had EDH, 9 (40.91%) had subdural, 2 (9.09%) had SAH and 2 (9.09%) had ICrH. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the frequency of ICH is 44% and the incidence of SDH and EDH is equally higher than other types. Patients with RTA have higher risk of ICH and it is more in females than in males. Data analysis for different variables was done by using Microsoft excel 365. Graphs and charts were used to explain the results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅脑外伤患者gcs10 -15型颅内出血发生率的ct评价
摘要:颅脑外伤是造成死亡的重要原因之一。颅内出血的特权是致命的问题之一。ct扫描被认为是外伤性脑损伤诊断的金标准。患者的GCS有助于患者的评价。高GCS患者被忽视,但可以认为他们可能发展出严重的问题。然而,对于13-15 GCS患者是否进行ct扫描存在争议。目的:我在此评估ct扫描GCS高10-15可能被忽视但可能出现症状的头部创伤患者。我的研究目的是确定这样的患者出院是否安全,或者进行CT扫描是否安全。除此之外,我主要查找了50例GCS为10-15的患者中不同类型ICH的发生频率。方法:对50例颅脑外伤患者进行计算机断层扫描。所有患者均行脑ct无对比扫描,轴位像,从枕骨大孔到顶角5mm的层厚。填写了患者的姓名、年龄、性别和其他调查结果。通过设置一些排除标准,即出血性疾病和抗凝治疗,任何统计变量都是正确的,因此它可能不会影响预期的结论。结果:50例患者中22例(44.00%)发生颅内出血。在这22例患者中,9例(40.91%)有EDH, 9例(40.91%)有硬膜下,2例(9.09%)有SAH, 2例(9.09%)有ICrH。结论:本研究表明ICH发生率为44%,SDH和EDH的发生率均高于其他类型。RTA患者患脑出血的风险较高,女性高于男性。使用Microsoft excel 365对不同变量进行数据分析。用图形和图表来解释结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bacteremias in Intensive Care Unit: A Two-Year Retrospective Study Early Puerperium Gangrenous Sigmoid Volvulus: Case Report Respiratory Distress in Children Aged 6 to 59 Months at the Pediatric Department of the Csref of Commune V of Bamako: Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Incidence, Risk Factors and Mortality of COVID-19 among Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis Heartache to Happiness: Managing a Six Year Hormonal Subfertility with a Successful Rate of Conception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1