Prediction of beef quality traits through mini NIR spectrophotometer and multivariate analyses

M. Hashem, Sanjana Tule, M. Khan, Md. Mizanur Rahman, M. Azad, MS Ali
{"title":"Prediction of beef quality traits through mini NIR spectrophotometer and multivariate analyses","authors":"M. Hashem, Sanjana Tule, M. Khan, Md. Mizanur Rahman, M. Azad, MS Ali","doi":"10.55002/mr.1.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to test the ability of mini NIR reflectance spectroscopy to predict beef quality traits. Sixty M. longissimus thoracis were collected and spectra were obtained prior to beef quality trait analysis. Calibration equations were developed from reference data (n=60) of pH, color traits (lightness, redness and yellowness), drip loss (%), cooking loss (%), CP (%), EE (%), moisture (%), DM (%), and Ash (%) using partial least squares regressions. Predictive ability of the models was assessed by coefficient of determination of cross-validation (R2CV) and root mean square error of cross-validation. Predictions models were satisfactory (R2CV = 0.95) for pH, (R2CV = 0.96) for lightness (L*), (R2CV = 0.96) for redness (a*), (R2CV = 0.97) for yellowness (b*), (R2CV = 0.95) for drip loss, (R2CV = 0.95) for cooking loss, (R2CV = 0.94) for CP, (R2CV = 0.95) for EE, (R2CV = 0.91) for moisture, (R2CV = 0.91) for DM and (R2CV = 0.91) for ash. The ratio performance deviation is 5.35, 5.34, 5.87, 5.16, 4.64, 4.81, 4.45, 4.95, 3.36, 4.73 and 4.47 for L*, a*, b*, pH, drip loss, cooking loss, CP, EE, moisture, DM and Ash respectively which indicates that all values are adequate for analytical purposes. Range error ratio are 20.69, 22.97, 27.11, 18.92, 20.74, 16.20, 17.80, 17.52, 14.96, 17.89 and 17.87 for L*, a*, b*, pH, drip loss, cooking loss, CP, EE, moisture, DM and ash respectively. From the findings of this study it can be concluded that mini NIRS is a suitable tool for a rapid, non-destructive and reliable prediction of beef quality.","PeriodicalId":305753,"journal":{"name":"Meat Research | ISSN (Online Version): 2790-1971","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Research | ISSN (Online Version): 2790-1971","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55002/mr.1.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the ability of mini NIR reflectance spectroscopy to predict beef quality traits. Sixty M. longissimus thoracis were collected and spectra were obtained prior to beef quality trait analysis. Calibration equations were developed from reference data (n=60) of pH, color traits (lightness, redness and yellowness), drip loss (%), cooking loss (%), CP (%), EE (%), moisture (%), DM (%), and Ash (%) using partial least squares regressions. Predictive ability of the models was assessed by coefficient of determination of cross-validation (R2CV) and root mean square error of cross-validation. Predictions models were satisfactory (R2CV = 0.95) for pH, (R2CV = 0.96) for lightness (L*), (R2CV = 0.96) for redness (a*), (R2CV = 0.97) for yellowness (b*), (R2CV = 0.95) for drip loss, (R2CV = 0.95) for cooking loss, (R2CV = 0.94) for CP, (R2CV = 0.95) for EE, (R2CV = 0.91) for moisture, (R2CV = 0.91) for DM and (R2CV = 0.91) for ash. The ratio performance deviation is 5.35, 5.34, 5.87, 5.16, 4.64, 4.81, 4.45, 4.95, 3.36, 4.73 and 4.47 for L*, a*, b*, pH, drip loss, cooking loss, CP, EE, moisture, DM and Ash respectively which indicates that all values are adequate for analytical purposes. Range error ratio are 20.69, 22.97, 27.11, 18.92, 20.74, 16.20, 17.80, 17.52, 14.96, 17.89 and 17.87 for L*, a*, b*, pH, drip loss, cooking loss, CP, EE, moisture, DM and ash respectively. From the findings of this study it can be concluded that mini NIRS is a suitable tool for a rapid, non-destructive and reliable prediction of beef quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用微型近红外分光光度计和多变量分析预测牛肉品质性状
本研究的目的是测试微型近红外反射光谱预测牛肉品质性状的能力。在进行牛肉品质性状分析之前,采集了60条胸最长肌并获得了光谱。采用偏最小二乘回归方法,从pH值、颜色特征(亮度、红度和黄度)、滴水损失(%)、蒸煮损失(%)、CP(%)、EE(%)、水分(%)、DM(%)和灰分(%)的参考数据(n=60)建立校准方程。通过交叉验证决定系数(R2CV)和交叉验证均方根误差评估模型的预测能力。对于pH (R2CV = 0.95)、亮度(L*) (R2CV = 0.96)、红度(a*) (R2CV = 0.96)、黄度(b*) (R2CV = 0.97)、滴漏损失(R2CV = 0.95)、蒸煮损失(R2CV = 0.95)、CP (R2CV = 0.94)、EE (R2CV = 0.95)、水分(R2CV = 0.91)、DM (R2CV = 0.91)和灰分(R2CV = 0.91)的预测模型令人满意。L*、a*、b*、pH、滴漏损失、蒸煮损失、CP、EE、水分、DM和灰分的比值性能偏差分别为5.35、5.34、5.87、5.16、4.64、4.81、4.45、4.95、3.36、4.73和4.47,表明所有数值均可满足分析要求。L*、a*、b*、pH、滴水损失、蒸煮损失、CP、EE、水分、DM和灰分的范围误差比分别为20.69、22.97、27.11、18.92、20.74、16.20、17.80、17.52、14.96、17.89和17.87。从本研究的结果可以得出结论,迷你近红外光谱是一种快速、无损和可靠的牛肉品质预测工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prediction of beef quality traits through mini NIR spectrophotometer and multivariate analyses Comparative study of certain antioxidants-electrolyzed reduced water, tocotrienol and vitamin E in heat-induced oxidative damage and performance in broilers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1