A Systematic Literature Review of Student Satisfaction: What is Next?

{"title":"A Systematic Literature Review of Student Satisfaction: What is Next?","authors":"","doi":"10.55057/ijares.2022.4.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to review student satisfaction by examining a variety of relevant papers. This article provides a systematic literature review on student satisfaction (SS) research published between 2000 and 2022. The review uses data from the Scopus database using relevant keywords such as student satisfaction. Thirty highly cited papers were selected from 1615 articles for this systematic literature assessment. This study showed that students in the United States (US), United Arab Emirates (UAE), Vietnam, New Zealand, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), Pakistan, Cyprus, Ireland, China, and Norway are content with the quality of e-learning services offered by their universities. On the other hand, students in Jordan, Germany, and Australia reported multiple issues with their involvement in online courses, such as internet connection disruptions also poor sound quality and were much more satisfied with traditional classroom instruction than online learning. In addition, Malaysia, Poland, Italy, and the United Kingdom performed research and identified other factors, including ranking, professional, comfortable environment; student assessments and learning experiences; classroom environment; lecture and tutorial goods; textbook and tuition fees; student support facilities; business procedures; relationship with teaching staff; knowledgeable, responsive faculty; staff helpfulness; feedback; and class sizes for evaluating student satisfaction. Based on a review and analysis of the SS literature, this paper came up with 11 questions for future research that will allow the research to be expanded.","PeriodicalId":426882,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2022.4.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to review student satisfaction by examining a variety of relevant papers. This article provides a systematic literature review on student satisfaction (SS) research published between 2000 and 2022. The review uses data from the Scopus database using relevant keywords such as student satisfaction. Thirty highly cited papers were selected from 1615 articles for this systematic literature assessment. This study showed that students in the United States (US), United Arab Emirates (UAE), Vietnam, New Zealand, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), Pakistan, Cyprus, Ireland, China, and Norway are content with the quality of e-learning services offered by their universities. On the other hand, students in Jordan, Germany, and Australia reported multiple issues with their involvement in online courses, such as internet connection disruptions also poor sound quality and were much more satisfied with traditional classroom instruction than online learning. In addition, Malaysia, Poland, Italy, and the United Kingdom performed research and identified other factors, including ranking, professional, comfortable environment; student assessments and learning experiences; classroom environment; lecture and tutorial goods; textbook and tuition fees; student support facilities; business procedures; relationship with teaching staff; knowledgeable, responsive faculty; staff helpfulness; feedback; and class sizes for evaluating student satisfaction. Based on a review and analysis of the SS literature, this paper came up with 11 questions for future research that will allow the research to be expanded.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生满意度的系统文献综述:下一步是什么?
本研究的目的是检讨学生满意度通过审查各种相关的论文。本文对2000年至2022年间发表的学生满意度研究进行了系统的文献综述。该评论使用了Scopus数据库中的数据,并使用了学生满意度等相关关键词。从1615篇文献中选取30篇高被引论文进行系统文献评价。这项研究表明,美国(US)、阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)、越南、新西兰、沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)、巴基斯坦、塞浦路斯、爱尔兰、中国和挪威的学生对其大学提供的电子学习服务质量感到满意。另一方面,约旦、德国和澳大利亚的学生报告说,他们在参加在线课程时遇到了多种问题,比如网络连接中断、音质差,他们对传统课堂教学的满意度远高于在线学习。此外,马来西亚、波兰、意大利和英国进行了研究,并确定了其他因素,包括排名、专业、舒适的环境;学生评估及学习经验;教室环境;讲座和教学用品;课本及学费;学生支援设施;业务程序;与教师的关系;知识渊博、反应灵敏的教师队伍;员工乐于助人;反馈;以及评估学生满意度的班级规模。本文通过对党卫军相关文献的回顾和分析,提出了未来研究的11个问题,使研究得以拓展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Underachiever Studies of Gifted and Talented Students: Types and Implications Study On Application of Open Online Psychological Courses to Mental Health Education of College Students Kajian Jati Diri Holistik Pelajar Pintar dan Berbakat di Malaysia Measuring Student Adoption of Digital Platforms for Distance Education among University Students in Malaysia Penerapan Konsep Malaysia MADANI dalam Dasar Awam: Membudayakan Harmoni dalam Kepelbagaian
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1