Is the damage worth it? Testing handheld XRF as a non-destructive analytical tool for determining biogenic bone and tooth chemistry prior to destructive analyses

Emily M. B. Simpson, B. Crowley, D. Sturmer
{"title":"Is the damage worth it? Testing handheld XRF as a non-destructive analytical tool for determining biogenic bone and tooth chemistry prior to destructive analyses","authors":"Emily M. B. Simpson, B. Crowley, D. Sturmer","doi":"10.3389/fearc.2022.1098403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Isotopic analysis is destructive and requires that a specimen retains its original (biogenic) chemical composition. A specimen's relative abundance of calcium and phosphorous (Ca/P) or carbonate and phosphate (CO3/PO4) is often used to assess preservation. If a specimen's Ca/P or CO3/PO4 is similar to modern specimens, a specimen's isotopic composition may be biogenic. However, most methods for measuring these proxies are destructive. Moreover the relationships between Ca/P, CO3/PO4 and isotopic preservation are poorly established. In this study, we assessed the ability of handheld X-ray fluorescence (hXRF) to non-destructively evaluate a specimen's preservation by characterizing the calcium to phosphorous ratio (Ca/P). We first established that surface Ca/P (Ca/Psurface) for modern specimens was consistent with expectations for unaltered bone (1.3–2.3). Several specimens had slightly larger ratios, suggesting the currently accepted range may need to be expanded. Second, we tested the ability of Ca/Psurface to detect alteration using twenty Quaternary mammal teeth from Big Bone Lick, Kentucky. Ten specimens had Ca/Psurface between 1.3 and 2.3 and ten had larger ratios, suggesting alteration. Because most methods measure Ca/P in powder (Ca/Ppowder), we compared Ca/Psurface, Ca/Ppowder, and the enamel subsurface (Ca/Psubsurface). With two exceptions, Ca/Psubsurface and Ca/Ppowder were below 2.3, regardless of Ca/Psurface, suggesting that Ca/Ppowder and Ca/Psubsurface underestimate alteration. We next compared Ca/Psurface, CO3/PO4, and carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) isotope values for the fossil teeth. Fourteen specimens were identified as altered or unaltered by both proxies, but six specimens only had one altered proxy. Specimens with both proxies altered had lower, less variable δ13C values than specimens with both proxies unaltered. Median δ18O values were similar between these groups. Individuals with altered Ca/Psurface but unaltered CO3/PO4 isotopically resembled specimens with both proxies altered. Conversely, specimens with unaltered Ca/Psurface and altered CO3/PO4 were similar to specimens with both proxies unaltered. Notably, all individuals with both proxies altered had relatively low δ13C values, including a horse and mammoth, which are normally considered grazers (and therefore should have higher δ13C values). These and other altered specimens may be isotopically compromised. Overall, our results suggest that Ca/Psurface is effective at detecting alteration non-destructively, quickly, and affordably, making it an attractive approach for analyzing unique specimens.","PeriodicalId":221074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fearc.2022.1098403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Isotopic analysis is destructive and requires that a specimen retains its original (biogenic) chemical composition. A specimen's relative abundance of calcium and phosphorous (Ca/P) or carbonate and phosphate (CO3/PO4) is often used to assess preservation. If a specimen's Ca/P or CO3/PO4 is similar to modern specimens, a specimen's isotopic composition may be biogenic. However, most methods for measuring these proxies are destructive. Moreover the relationships between Ca/P, CO3/PO4 and isotopic preservation are poorly established. In this study, we assessed the ability of handheld X-ray fluorescence (hXRF) to non-destructively evaluate a specimen's preservation by characterizing the calcium to phosphorous ratio (Ca/P). We first established that surface Ca/P (Ca/Psurface) for modern specimens was consistent with expectations for unaltered bone (1.3–2.3). Several specimens had slightly larger ratios, suggesting the currently accepted range may need to be expanded. Second, we tested the ability of Ca/Psurface to detect alteration using twenty Quaternary mammal teeth from Big Bone Lick, Kentucky. Ten specimens had Ca/Psurface between 1.3 and 2.3 and ten had larger ratios, suggesting alteration. Because most methods measure Ca/P in powder (Ca/Ppowder), we compared Ca/Psurface, Ca/Ppowder, and the enamel subsurface (Ca/Psubsurface). With two exceptions, Ca/Psubsurface and Ca/Ppowder were below 2.3, regardless of Ca/Psurface, suggesting that Ca/Ppowder and Ca/Psubsurface underestimate alteration. We next compared Ca/Psurface, CO3/PO4, and carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) isotope values for the fossil teeth. Fourteen specimens were identified as altered or unaltered by both proxies, but six specimens only had one altered proxy. Specimens with both proxies altered had lower, less variable δ13C values than specimens with both proxies unaltered. Median δ18O values were similar between these groups. Individuals with altered Ca/Psurface but unaltered CO3/PO4 isotopically resembled specimens with both proxies altered. Conversely, specimens with unaltered Ca/Psurface and altered CO3/PO4 were similar to specimens with both proxies unaltered. Notably, all individuals with both proxies altered had relatively low δ13C values, including a horse and mammoth, which are normally considered grazers (and therefore should have higher δ13C values). These and other altered specimens may be isotopically compromised. Overall, our results suggest that Ca/Psurface is effective at detecting alteration non-destructively, quickly, and affordably, making it an attractive approach for analyzing unique specimens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这些损失值得吗?测试手持式XRF作为一种非破坏性分析工具,用于在破坏性分析之前确定生物骨和牙齿化学
同位素分析是破坏性的,要求标本保留其原始(生物)化学成分。标本的钙和磷(Ca/P)或碳酸盐和磷酸盐(CO3/PO4)的相对丰度通常用于评估保存情况。如果标本的Ca/P或CO3/PO4与现代标本相似,则标本的同位素组成可能是生物成因的。然而,大多数测量这些代理的方法都是破坏性的。Ca/P、CO3/PO4与同位素保存的关系尚不明确。在这项研究中,我们评估了手持式x射线荧光(hXRF)通过表征钙磷比(Ca/P)来无损评估标本保存的能力。我们首先确定了现代标本的表面Ca/P (Ca/Psurface)与未改变骨的预期一致(1.3-2.3)。有几个标本的比例略大,这表明目前可接受的范围可能需要扩大。其次,我们用肯塔基州Big Bone Lick的20颗第四纪哺乳动物牙齿测试了Ca/Psurface检测变化的能力。Ca/Psurface值在1.3 ~ 2.3之间的有10个,较大的有10个,表明有蚀变现象。由于大多数方法测量粉末(Ca/Ppowder)中的Ca/P,我们比较了Ca/Psurface, Ca/Ppowder和牙釉质亚表面(Ca/Psubsurface)。Ca/Psubsurface和Ca/Psubsurface均低于2.3,与Ca/Psurface无关,说明Ca/Ppowder和Ca/Psubsurface低估了蚀变。接下来,我们比较了化石牙齿的Ca/Psurface、CO3/PO4、碳(δ13C)和氧(δ18O)同位素值。14个标本被两种代用物改变或未改变,6个标本只有一种代用物改变。两种指标改变后的样品δ13C值比两种指标不变的样品更低、更少。两组间δ18O值中位数相似。Ca/ p表面改变而CO3/PO4未改变的个体同位素与两个指标都改变的标本相似。相反,Ca/ p面不变和CO3/PO4不变的标本与这两个指标不变的标本相似。值得注意的是,所有两个代用指标都改变的个体的δ13C值都相对较低,包括一匹马和猛犸象,它们通常被认为是食草动物(因此应该有更高的δ13C值)。这些和其他蚀变标本可能在同位素上受到损害。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,Ca/Psurface在无损、快速、经济地检测变化方面是有效的,使其成为分析独特标本的一种有吸引力的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fighting erasure and dispossession in the San Francisco Bay Area: putting archaeology to work for the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe Fire-human-climate interactions in the Bolivian Amazon rainforest ecotone from the Last Glacial Maximum to late Holocene Early husbandry practices in highland areas during the Neolithic: the case of Coro Trasito cave (Huesca, Spain) Assessing the use of stable isotope values from deer antlers as proxies for seasonal environmental variation New zooarchaeological evidence from Pictish sites in Scotland: implications for early medieval economies and animal-human relationships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1