Make It Big!: The Effect of Font Size and Line Spacing on Online Readability

Luz Rello, M. Pielot, Mari-Carmen Marcos
{"title":"Make It Big!: The Effect of Font Size and Line Spacing on Online Readability","authors":"Luz Rello, M. Pielot, Mari-Carmen Marcos","doi":"10.1145/2858036.2858204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report from an eye-tracking experiment with 104 participants who performed reading tasks on the most popular text-heavy website of the Web: Wikipedia. Using a hybrid-measures design, we compared objective and subjective readability and comprehension of the articles for font sizes ranging from 10 to 26 points, and line spacings ranging from 0.8 to 1.8 (font: Arial). Our findings provide evidence that readability, measured via mean fixation duration, increased significantly with font size. Further, comprehension questions had significantly more correct responses for font sizes 18 and 26. For line spacing, we found marginal effects, suggesting that the two tested extremes (0.8 and 1.8) impair readability. These findings provide evidence that text-heavy websites should use fonts of size 18 or larger and use default line spacing when the goal is to make a web page easy to read and comprehend. Our results significantly differ from previous recommendations, presumably, because this is the first work to cover font sizes beyond 14 points.","PeriodicalId":169608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

We report from an eye-tracking experiment with 104 participants who performed reading tasks on the most popular text-heavy website of the Web: Wikipedia. Using a hybrid-measures design, we compared objective and subjective readability and comprehension of the articles for font sizes ranging from 10 to 26 points, and line spacings ranging from 0.8 to 1.8 (font: Arial). Our findings provide evidence that readability, measured via mean fixation duration, increased significantly with font size. Further, comprehension questions had significantly more correct responses for font sizes 18 and 26. For line spacing, we found marginal effects, suggesting that the two tested extremes (0.8 and 1.8) impair readability. These findings provide evidence that text-heavy websites should use fonts of size 18 or larger and use default line spacing when the goal is to make a web page easy to read and comprehend. Our results significantly differ from previous recommendations, presumably, because this is the first work to cover font sizes beyond 14 points.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
做大!字体大小和行距对网络可读性的影响
我们对104名参与者进行了一项眼球追踪实验,他们在最受欢迎的文本网站维基百科上执行阅读任务。使用混合测量设计,我们比较了文章的客观和主观可读性和理解,字体大小从10到26点,行间距从0.8到1.8(字体:Arial)。我们的研究结果提供了通过平均注视时间来衡量的可读性随着字体大小的增加而显著增加的证据。此外,对于字体大小为18和26的理解题,回答的正确率明显更高。对于行间距,我们发现了边际效应,表明两个测试的极端值(0.8和1.8)会损害可读性。这些发现提供了证据表明,如果要使网页易于阅读和理解,那么文本较多的网站应该使用18或更大的字体,并使用默认的行间距。我们的结果与之前的建议有很大的不同,这可能是因为这是第一次研究超过14点的字体大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism Proactive Sensing for Improving Hand Pose Estimation On Looking at the Vagina through Labella Simplified Audio Production in Asynchronous Voice-Based Discussions ShapeCanvas: An Exploration of Shape-Changing Content Generation by Members of the Public
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1