Permission Issues in Open-Source Android Apps: An Exploratory Study

Gian Luca Scoccia, Anthony S Peruma, Virginia Pujols, I. Malavolta, Daniel E. Krutz
{"title":"Permission Issues in Open-Source Android Apps: An Exploratory Study","authors":"Gian Luca Scoccia, Anthony S Peruma, Virginia Pujols, I. Malavolta, Daniel E. Krutz","doi":"10.1109/SCAM.2019.00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Permissions are one of the most fundamental components for protecting an Android user's privacy and security. Unfortunately, developers frequently misuse permissions by requiring too many or too few permissions, or by not adhering to permission best practices. These permission-related issues can negatively impact users in a variety of ways, ranging from creating a poor user experience to severe privacy and security implications. To advance the understanding permission-related issues during the app's development process, we conducted an empirical study of 574 GitHub repositories of open-source Android apps. We analyzed the occurrences of four types of permission-related issues across the lifetime of the apps. Our findings reveal that (i) permission-related issues are a frequent phenomenon in Android apps, (ii) the majority of issues are fixed within a few days after their introduction, (iii) permission-related issues can frequently linger inside an app for an extended period of time, which can be as high as several years, before being fixed, and (iv) both project newcomers and regular contributors exhibit the same behaviour in terms of number of introduced and fixed permission-related issues per commit.","PeriodicalId":431316,"journal":{"name":"2019 19th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 19th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM.2019.00034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Permissions are one of the most fundamental components for protecting an Android user's privacy and security. Unfortunately, developers frequently misuse permissions by requiring too many or too few permissions, or by not adhering to permission best practices. These permission-related issues can negatively impact users in a variety of ways, ranging from creating a poor user experience to severe privacy and security implications. To advance the understanding permission-related issues during the app's development process, we conducted an empirical study of 574 GitHub repositories of open-source Android apps. We analyzed the occurrences of four types of permission-related issues across the lifetime of the apps. Our findings reveal that (i) permission-related issues are a frequent phenomenon in Android apps, (ii) the majority of issues are fixed within a few days after their introduction, (iii) permission-related issues can frequently linger inside an app for an extended period of time, which can be as high as several years, before being fixed, and (iv) both project newcomers and regular contributors exhibit the same behaviour in terms of number of introduced and fixed permission-related issues per commit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开源Android应用程序中的权限问题:一项探索性研究
权限是保护Android用户隐私和安全的最基本组件之一。不幸的是,开发人员经常通过要求太多或太少的权限,或者不遵守权限最佳实践来滥用权限。这些与权限相关的问题可能以各种方式对用户产生负面影响,从创建糟糕的用户体验到严重的隐私和安全隐患。为了加深对应用开发过程中权限相关问题的理解,我们对574个开源Android应用的GitHub库进行了实证研究。我们分析了在应用的整个生命周期中出现的四种类型的权限相关问题。我们的研究结果显示:(1)权限相关问题在Android应用中是一个常见现象,(2)大多数问题在引入后几天内就得到了修复,(3)权限相关问题通常会在应用中持续很长一段时间,可能长达数年,然后才得到修复。(iv)项目新人和常规贡献者在每次提交时引入的和固定的权限相关问题的数量方面表现出相同的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Efficacy of Dynamic Behavior Comparison for Judging Functional Equivalence Permission Issues in Open-Source Android Apps: An Exploratory Study Interactive Refactoring Documentation Bot Software Engineering by Source Transformation – Experience with TXL (Most Influential Paper, SCAM 2001) On the Quality of Identifiers in Test Code
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1