From Legislation to a Community Vision: Engaging Diverse Stakeholders in Developing Statewide SEL Guidance

Julie Petrokubi, Sarah Pierce
{"title":"From Legislation to a Community Vision: Engaging Diverse Stakeholders in Developing Statewide SEL Guidance","authors":"Julie Petrokubi, Sarah Pierce","doi":"10.1108/s0749-742320210000021018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past five years, state education agencies (SEAs) have increased the number of social and emotional learning (SEL) policies, oftentimes engaging stakeholders across the state. However, few use multiple sources of stakeholder engagement data to develop and improve their SEL standards and resources (Yoder, Dusenbury, Martinez-Black, & Weissberg, 2020). This chapter describes the experience of a nonprofit research organization supporting an SEA and a volunteer workgroup in Washington state to gather and use several forms of stakeholder input and feedback in developing statewide SEL guidance for K-12 educators. Operating from a research–practice partnership framework (Coburn & Penuel, 2016), the team assisted the workgroup members in applying both an ecological systems theory perspective (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Bronfenbrenner & Morris, 2006) and an equity lens to their work through an iterative process of data collection, interpretation, and use. This chapter describes the process and outcomes of this research–practice partnership and provides examples of how the workgroup incorporated stakeholder input and feedback into the development of SEL guidance and resources. We offer insights and lessons learned from these efforts to expand the perspectives represented in SEL research and policymaking. Our aim is to highlight the importance of stakeholder engagement to ensure that SEL guidance considers the priorities and values of diverse communities, especially historically marginalized communities. We hope to encourage more research–practice partnerships to investigate and amplify community perspectives in SEL.","PeriodicalId":220502,"journal":{"name":"Motivating the SEL Field Forward Through Equity","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motivating the SEL Field Forward Through Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s0749-742320210000021018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past five years, state education agencies (SEAs) have increased the number of social and emotional learning (SEL) policies, oftentimes engaging stakeholders across the state. However, few use multiple sources of stakeholder engagement data to develop and improve their SEL standards and resources (Yoder, Dusenbury, Martinez-Black, & Weissberg, 2020). This chapter describes the experience of a nonprofit research organization supporting an SEA and a volunteer workgroup in Washington state to gather and use several forms of stakeholder input and feedback in developing statewide SEL guidance for K-12 educators. Operating from a research–practice partnership framework (Coburn & Penuel, 2016), the team assisted the workgroup members in applying both an ecological systems theory perspective (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Bronfenbrenner & Morris, 2006) and an equity lens to their work through an iterative process of data collection, interpretation, and use. This chapter describes the process and outcomes of this research–practice partnership and provides examples of how the workgroup incorporated stakeholder input and feedback into the development of SEL guidance and resources. We offer insights and lessons learned from these efforts to expand the perspectives represented in SEL research and policymaking. Our aim is to highlight the importance of stakeholder engagement to ensure that SEL guidance considers the priorities and values of diverse communities, especially historically marginalized communities. We hope to encourage more research–practice partnerships to investigate and amplify community perspectives in SEL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从立法到社区愿景:让不同的利益相关者参与制定全州SEL指南
在过去的五年中,州教育机构(SEAs)增加了社会和情感学习(SEL)政策的数量,通常会吸引整个州的利益相关者。然而,很少有人使用利益相关者参与数据的多个来源来开发和改进他们的SEL标准和资源(Yoder, Dusenbury, Martinez-Black, & Weissberg, 2020)。本章描述了一个非营利研究组织支持华盛顿州的SEA和一个志愿者工作组的经验,该组织在为K-12教育工作者制定全州范围的SEL指导时,收集并使用了几种形式的利益相关者的输入和反馈。从研究-实践伙伴关系框架(Coburn & Penuel, 2016)运作,该团队协助工作组成员应用生态系统理论视角(Bronfenbrenner, 1979;Bronfenbrenner & Morris, 2006),并通过数据收集、解释和使用的迭代过程,以公平的视角看待他们的工作。本章描述了这一研究-实践伙伴关系的过程和结果,并提供了工作组如何将利益相关者的投入和反馈纳入SEL指南和资源开发的示例。我们提供了从这些努力中获得的见解和经验教训,以扩展SEL研究和决策中所代表的视角。我们的目标是强调利益相关者参与的重要性,以确保SEL指南考虑到不同社区的优先事项和价值观,特别是历史上被边缘化的社区。我们希望鼓励更多的研究-实践伙伴关系,以调查和扩大社区对SEL的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Increasing Disciplinary Equity by Teaching Neutralizing Routines to Teachers and Students From Legislation to a Community Vision: Engaging Diverse Stakeholders in Developing Statewide SEL Guidance Engaging in a Bidirectional Partnership to Support an Expanded Definition of Student Success Engaging in Equitable SEL: How Researchers and Practitioners Can Work Together to Expand Learning in Out-of-School Time Teachers as Prosocial Leaders Promoting Social and Emotional Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1