Assessment of Stress Based Design Pipelines Experiencing High Axial Strains

R. Andrews, M. Stephens, M. Carr, Johannes Brückner
{"title":"Assessment of Stress Based Design Pipelines Experiencing High Axial Strains","authors":"R. Andrews, M. Stephens, M. Carr, Johannes Brückner","doi":"10.1115/IPC2018-78111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strain based design concepts have been extensively used for subsea pipelines for both installation and service. However, most onshore transmission pipelines are designed assuming a maximum longitudinal stress, typically 90% SMYS. Some onshore pipelines have been designed for a limiting axial strain generated by causes such as seismic activity, frost heave, discontinuous permafrost or landslides. Models have been developed to predict the axial strain capacity in both tension (usually limited by the girth welds) and compression (where the limit is local buckling of the pipe wall).\n In service monitoring of a pipeline initially designed on a stress basis may reveal that strains approaching or exceeding the design level are occurring, or are predicted to occur in the future. In these cases the pipeline operator will have to assess if the pipeline is fit for continued service. In principle strain based design approaches could be adapted for such an assessment.\n Strain based design approaches place more onerous demands on the linepipe and the girth welds, but for a new pipeline these requirements can be addressed during design, material specification, procurement and weld procedure qualification. However, for an existing pipeline the data required to use strain based approaches may not be readily available. Some strain capacity models are only valid over a restricted range of inputs and so cannot be used in all cases. Hence there is a need to develop guidance for assessing the fitness for purpose of a stress based design pipeline that is found to be experiencing high axial strains.\n The European Pipeline Research Group (EPRG) has initiated a program to develop such guidance. This paper presents the results of the first stage of this program. The requirements for data such as inspection records, weld metal fracture toughness and parent pipe mechanical properties are considered. A flow chart has been developed to guide operators when assessing an existing pipeline found to be subject to high strains, and a gap analysis identifies areas where additional work is required.","PeriodicalId":164582,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Strain based design concepts have been extensively used for subsea pipelines for both installation and service. However, most onshore transmission pipelines are designed assuming a maximum longitudinal stress, typically 90% SMYS. Some onshore pipelines have been designed for a limiting axial strain generated by causes such as seismic activity, frost heave, discontinuous permafrost or landslides. Models have been developed to predict the axial strain capacity in both tension (usually limited by the girth welds) and compression (where the limit is local buckling of the pipe wall). In service monitoring of a pipeline initially designed on a stress basis may reveal that strains approaching or exceeding the design level are occurring, or are predicted to occur in the future. In these cases the pipeline operator will have to assess if the pipeline is fit for continued service. In principle strain based design approaches could be adapted for such an assessment. Strain based design approaches place more onerous demands on the linepipe and the girth welds, but for a new pipeline these requirements can be addressed during design, material specification, procurement and weld procedure qualification. However, for an existing pipeline the data required to use strain based approaches may not be readily available. Some strain capacity models are only valid over a restricted range of inputs and so cannot be used in all cases. Hence there is a need to develop guidance for assessing the fitness for purpose of a stress based design pipeline that is found to be experiencing high axial strains. The European Pipeline Research Group (EPRG) has initiated a program to develop such guidance. This paper presents the results of the first stage of this program. The requirements for data such as inspection records, weld metal fracture toughness and parent pipe mechanical properties are considered. A flow chart has been developed to guide operators when assessing an existing pipeline found to be subject to high strains, and a gap analysis identifies areas where additional work is required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高轴向应变时基于应力的管道设计评估
基于应变的设计理念已广泛用于海底管道的安装和维护。然而,大多数陆上输送管道在设计时都假定最大纵向应力,通常为90%的SMYS。一些陆上管道的设计是为了应对由地震活动、冻胀、不连续的永久冻土或滑坡等原因产生的极限轴向应变。已经开发了模型来预测在拉伸(通常受环焊缝限制)和压缩(极限是管壁的局部屈曲)下的轴向应变能力。在对最初以应力为基础设计的管道进行使用监测时,可能会发现正在发生或预计将来会发生接近或超过设计水平的应变。在这种情况下,管道运营商必须评估管道是否适合继续使用。原则上,基于应变的设计方法可以适用于这样的评估。基于应变的设计方法对管道和环焊缝提出了更苛刻的要求,但对于新管道来说,这些要求可以在设计、材料规格、采购和焊接工艺鉴定过程中得到解决。然而,对于现有的管道,使用基于应变的方法所需的数据可能不容易获得。一些应变能力模型仅在有限的输入范围内有效,因此不能在所有情况下使用。因此,有必要制定指导方针,以评估高轴向应变的基于应力的管道设计的适用性。欧洲管道研究小组(EPRG)已经启动了一个项目来制定这样的指南。本文介绍了该方案第一阶段的结果。考虑了对检测记录、焊缝金属断裂韧性和母管力学性能等数据的要求。开发了流程图,以指导作业者评估现有的高应变管道,并通过差距分析确定需要进行额外工作的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pipeline Dent Fatigue Crack Leak Rate for Liquids Pipelines and the Application to Release Consequence Assessment Automated Creation of the Pipeline Digital Twin During Construction: Improvement to Construction Quality and Pipeline Integrity Accelerating Industry Performance Through Collaborative Continual Improvement Assessment of Stress Based Design Pipelines Experiencing High Axial Strains The Application of Bayesian Network Threat Model for Corrosion Assessment of Pipeline in Design Stage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1