"How do you Criticize a Life Story?"

T. Brown
{"title":"\"How do you Criticize a Life Story?\"","authors":"T. Brown","doi":"10.25071/2564-4661.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“‘How do you Criticize a Life Story?’: Form, Trauma, and Memoir in Canada Reads 2020” investigates the practice of reading for empathy, as it pertains to memoir and trauma operating in the hypervisibility of the public sphere. The emotional connection between reader and author that memoir inspires is also encouraged on Canada Reads, the popular intersection of a literary contest and reality show. The panelists’ 2020 discussion of Jesse Thistle’s From the Ashes and Samra Habib’s We Have Always Been Here encouraged reading as a means of empathizing with the author’s experiences. As Danielle Fuller details, this is also how many viewers appraise the titles featured on Canada Reads, adopting a method of literary evaluation that is inherently personal. Memoir, given its connection to the real world and real people, becomes an excellent candidate for connecting with the reader. While Philippe Lejeune argues that memoir must be entirely non-fictional, G. Thomas Couser and Leigh Gilmore demonstrate that for a genre grappling with selective memory and trauma, this is impossible. As a result, memoir proves to be a genre that is both popular amongst readers and necessarily literary and inventive in its construction. The popularity of Canada Reads and memoir indicate that empathetic reading deserves a place in literary discourse, which in turn reimagines the Canadian literary canon and traditional methods of evaluation. \n ","PeriodicalId":296069,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Kanata: Interdisciplinary Approaches To Canadian Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Kanata: Interdisciplinary Approaches To Canadian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/2564-4661.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“‘How do you Criticize a Life Story?’: Form, Trauma, and Memoir in Canada Reads 2020” investigates the practice of reading for empathy, as it pertains to memoir and trauma operating in the hypervisibility of the public sphere. The emotional connection between reader and author that memoir inspires is also encouraged on Canada Reads, the popular intersection of a literary contest and reality show. The panelists’ 2020 discussion of Jesse Thistle’s From the Ashes and Samra Habib’s We Have Always Been Here encouraged reading as a means of empathizing with the author’s experiences. As Danielle Fuller details, this is also how many viewers appraise the titles featured on Canada Reads, adopting a method of literary evaluation that is inherently personal. Memoir, given its connection to the real world and real people, becomes an excellent candidate for connecting with the reader. While Philippe Lejeune argues that memoir must be entirely non-fictional, G. Thomas Couser and Leigh Gilmore demonstrate that for a genre grappling with selective memory and trauma, this is impossible. As a result, memoir proves to be a genre that is both popular amongst readers and necessarily literary and inventive in its construction. The popularity of Canada Reads and memoir indicate that empathetic reading deserves a place in literary discourse, which in turn reimagines the Canadian literary canon and traditional methods of evaluation.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你如何评价一个人生故事?”
“你如何评价一个人生故事?”“2020年加拿大阅读的形式、创伤和回忆录”调查了同理心阅读的实践,因为它与公共领域超可见性下的回忆录和创伤有关。《加拿大阅读》也鼓励读者和作者之间的情感联系,这是一个流行的文学比赛和真人秀的交集。2020年,小组成员讨论了杰西·西斯尔的《从灰烬中重生》和萨姆拉·哈比卜的《我们一直在这里》,鼓励将阅读作为对作者经历感同身受的一种手段。正如丹妮尔·富勒(Danielle Fuller)所详述的,这也是许多观众对《加拿大阅读》(Canada Reads)上的作品的评价,他们采用了一种本质上属于个人的文学评价方法。回忆录,由于它与真实世界和真实人物的联系,成为与读者建立联系的绝佳选择。菲利普·勒琼(Philippe Lejeune)认为回忆录必须完全非虚构,而g·托马斯·库瑟(G. Thomas Couser)和利·吉尔摩(Leigh Gilmore)则证明,对于一种与选择性记忆和创伤作斗争的类型来说,这是不可能的。因此,回忆录被证明是一种既受读者欢迎,又在其结构上必然具有文学性和创造性的体裁。《加拿大阅读》和《回忆录》的流行表明,移情阅读在文学话语中应该占有一席之地,这反过来又重新想象了加拿大文学经典和传统的评价方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Sparkles Does Not Always Shine "How do you Criticize a Life Story?" Examining the Subjugation of Indigenous Women through Community Partnerships with Extractive Industries we're all in this together Graphic Reminders: Confronting Colonialism in Canada through Betty: The Helen Betty Osborne Story
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1