Learning to Trust the Crowd: Some Lessons from Wikipedia

F. Olleros
{"title":"Learning to Trust the Crowd: Some Lessons from Wikipedia","authors":"F. Olleros","doi":"10.1109/MCETECH.2008.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inspired by the open source software (OSS) movement, Wikipedia has gone further than any OSS project in decentralizing its quality control task. This is seen by many as a fatal flaw. In this short paper, the author try to show that it is rather a shrewd and fertile design choice. First, the author describes the precise way in which Wikipedia is more decentralized than OSS projects. Secondly, the author explains why Wikipedia's quality control can be and must be decentralized. Thirdly, the author show why it is wise for Wikipedia to welcome anonymous amateurs. Finally, the author argue that concerns about Wikipedia's quality and sustainable success have to be tempered by the fact that, as disruptive innovations tend to do, Wikipedia is in the process of redefining the pertinent dimensions of quality and value for general encyclopedias.","PeriodicalId":299458,"journal":{"name":"2008 International MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies (mcetech 2008)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies (mcetech 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCETECH.2008.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Inspired by the open source software (OSS) movement, Wikipedia has gone further than any OSS project in decentralizing its quality control task. This is seen by many as a fatal flaw. In this short paper, the author try to show that it is rather a shrewd and fertile design choice. First, the author describes the precise way in which Wikipedia is more decentralized than OSS projects. Secondly, the author explains why Wikipedia's quality control can be and must be decentralized. Thirdly, the author show why it is wise for Wikipedia to welcome anonymous amateurs. Finally, the author argue that concerns about Wikipedia's quality and sustainable success have to be tempered by the fact that, as disruptive innovations tend to do, Wikipedia is in the process of redefining the pertinent dimensions of quality and value for general encyclopedias.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学会信任大众:维基百科的一些教训
受开源软件(OSS)运动的启发,Wikipedia在分散其质量控制任务方面比任何OSS项目都走得更远。许多人认为这是一个致命的缺陷。在这篇短文中,作者试图表明这是一个相当精明和丰富的设计选择。首先,作者描述了维基百科比OSS项目更去中心化的确切方式。其次,作者解释了为什么维基百科的质量控制可以而且必须去中心化。第三,作者说明了为什么维基百科欢迎匿名的业余爱好者是明智的。最后,作者认为,对于维基百科的质量和可持续成功的担忧,必须考虑到这样一个事实:正如颠覆性创新往往会做的那样,维基百科正在重新定义一般百科全书的质量和价值的相关维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ontology Learning from Text Using Relational Concept Analysis Learning to Trust the Crowd: Some Lessons from Wikipedia NetSim: a Simulation and Visualization Software for Information Network Modeling Human Workflows via Document-Driven Process Choreography Trust and Autonomic Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1