Knowing in Uncertainty

G. de Roo
{"title":"Knowing in Uncertainty","authors":"G. de Roo","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2021.1981016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper adds axiology to ontology and epistemology. These three together address the ultimate questions of what (is being observed), how (to know and respond) and who (adds meaning). This is not about producing knowledge about one true reality. Instead, these three aspects will differentiate their questions about the what, how and who, depending on the circumstances. As these circumstances differ in varying degrees of uncertainty, it is the uncertainty of a situation that determines which ontological, epistemological and axiological questions are asked. This paper proposes three categories into which these questions can fall, for simple, complex and highly complex issues. For each of these categories of ‘uncertainty’, the ontological, epistemological and axiological questions must be in balance. With the addition of axiology and the differentiation of reality into various uncertainties, a much more powerful method of knowing and understanding the world in which we live arises.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"disP - The Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.1981016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper adds axiology to ontology and epistemology. These three together address the ultimate questions of what (is being observed), how (to know and respond) and who (adds meaning). This is not about producing knowledge about one true reality. Instead, these three aspects will differentiate their questions about the what, how and who, depending on the circumstances. As these circumstances differ in varying degrees of uncertainty, it is the uncertainty of a situation that determines which ontological, epistemological and axiological questions are asked. This paper proposes three categories into which these questions can fall, for simple, complex and highly complex issues. For each of these categories of ‘uncertainty’, the ontological, epistemological and axiological questions must be in balance. With the addition of axiology and the differentiation of reality into various uncertainties, a much more powerful method of knowing and understanding the world in which we live arises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不确定性中的认知
摘要本文在本体论和认识论的基础上增加了价值论。这三者共同解决了一些终极问题:被观察的是什么、如何了解和回应以及谁来增加意义。这不是关于产生关于一个真实现实的知识。相反,这三个方面将根据具体情况区分他们对“什么”、“如何”和“谁”的问题。由于这些情况有不同程度的不确定性,正是这种情况的不确定性决定了提出哪些本体论、认识论和价值论问题。本文将这些问题分为简单、复杂和高度复杂的三类。对于这些“不确定性”的每一个范畴,本体论、认识论和价值论的问题必须处于平衡状态。随着价值论的加入和对现实的各种不确定性的区分,一种更有力的认识和理解我们生活的世界的方法出现了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Karl Ganser. Integratives Planen und Handeln Leadership – collectively oriented: Insights from trajectories of temporary urbanism Die Bereitstellung von leistbarem Wohnraum in Zeiten der Wohnkrise Breaking out of the box – towards functional spatial planning Bucharest – the role of spatial planning in a challenging urban environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1