A method to evaluate the formability and fluidity of concrete based materials for 3D printing

Y. Hirayama, Jiali Zhang, Y. Kawahara
{"title":"A method to evaluate the formability and fluidity of concrete based materials for 3D printing","authors":"Y. Hirayama, Jiali Zhang, Y. Kawahara","doi":"10.1145/3328939.3329002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of 3D printers for construction brings a new possibility of creating walls with shapes that were not possible with conventional construction methods. However, existing construction materials can not be used for 3D printing as they are, and the exploration for new materials is the key to the realization of this concept. Formability and fluidity are the key factors in evaluating whether or not materials are suitable for 3D printing, including use within the field of architecture. A standardized quantitative method to evaluate construction materials is required for the comparison between materials for various projects. For example, the concrete slump test is one of the universal standards that is used to evaluate the quality and suitability for a specific construction method. In the emerging field of construction with 3D printing, however, a standardized method is yet to be established. This paper proposes an efficient method to evaluate the formability and fluidity of concrete-based materials, while only using simple instruments. The proposed method and instruments were tested by evaluating geo-polymer-based concretes, which are relatively difficult to evaluate due to its high intrinsic viscosity. By testing with these materials, we aim to show the methods ability to be applied to a wide range of materials. Notably, materials that were evaluated to be favorable under this method were confirmed to be suitable for use in 3D printing robots, being able to be used for building large structures.","PeriodicalId":404567,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328939.3329002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Use of 3D printers for construction brings a new possibility of creating walls with shapes that were not possible with conventional construction methods. However, existing construction materials can not be used for 3D printing as they are, and the exploration for new materials is the key to the realization of this concept. Formability and fluidity are the key factors in evaluating whether or not materials are suitable for 3D printing, including use within the field of architecture. A standardized quantitative method to evaluate construction materials is required for the comparison between materials for various projects. For example, the concrete slump test is one of the universal standards that is used to evaluate the quality and suitability for a specific construction method. In the emerging field of construction with 3D printing, however, a standardized method is yet to be established. This paper proposes an efficient method to evaluate the formability and fluidity of concrete-based materials, while only using simple instruments. The proposed method and instruments were tested by evaluating geo-polymer-based concretes, which are relatively difficult to evaluate due to its high intrinsic viscosity. By testing with these materials, we aim to show the methods ability to be applied to a wide range of materials. Notably, materials that were evaluated to be favorable under this method were confirmed to be suitable for use in 3D printing robots, being able to be used for building large structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种评估3D打印混凝土基材料成形性和流动性的方法
使用3D打印机进行施工带来了一种新的可能性,可以创造出传统施工方法无法实现的形状的墙壁。然而,现有的建筑材料并不能完全用于3D打印,对新材料的探索是实现这一概念的关键。可成形性和流动性是评估材料是否适合3D打印的关键因素,包括在建筑领域的使用。为了对不同工程的材料进行比较,需要一种标准化的定量方法来评价建筑材料。例如,混凝土坍落度试验是用于评价特定施工方法的质量和适用性的通用标准之一。然而,在新兴的3D打印建筑领域,一种标准化的方法尚未建立。本文提出了一种评估混凝土基材料成型性和流动性的有效方法,而只需使用简单的仪器。通过评估土工聚合物基混凝土来测试所提出的方法和仪器,由于其高特性粘度而相对难以评估。通过对这些材料的测试,我们的目标是展示该方法适用于各种材料的能力。值得注意的是,在这种方法下被评估为有利的材料被证实适合用于3D打印机器人,能够用于建造大型结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated reconstruction of smoothly joining 3D printed restorations to fix broken objects A method to evaluate the formability and fluidity of concrete based materials for 3D printing Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication Rough carving of 3D models with spatial augmented reality Exploring mechanical meta-material structures through personalised shoe sole design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1