What GPT Knows About Who is Who

Xiaohan Yang, Eduardo Peynetti, Vasco Meerman, Christy Tanner
{"title":"What GPT Knows About Who is Who","authors":"Xiaohan Yang, Eduardo Peynetti, Vasco Meerman, Christy Tanner","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2205.07407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coreference resolution – which is a crucial task for understanding discourse and language at large – has yet to witness widespread benefits from large language models (LLMs). Moreover, coreference resolution systems largely rely on supervised labels, which are highly expensive and difficult to annotate, thus making it ripe for prompt engineering. In this paper, we introduce a QA-based prompt-engineering method and discern generative, pre-trained LLMs’ abilities and limitations toward the task of coreference resolution. Our experiments show that GPT-2 and GPT-Neo can return valid answers, but that their capabilities to identify coreferent mentions are limited and prompt-sensitive, leading to inconsistent results.","PeriodicalId":441528,"journal":{"name":"First Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.07407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Coreference resolution – which is a crucial task for understanding discourse and language at large – has yet to witness widespread benefits from large language models (LLMs). Moreover, coreference resolution systems largely rely on supervised labels, which are highly expensive and difficult to annotate, thus making it ripe for prompt engineering. In this paper, we introduce a QA-based prompt-engineering method and discern generative, pre-trained LLMs’ abilities and limitations toward the task of coreference resolution. Our experiments show that GPT-2 and GPT-Neo can return valid answers, but that their capabilities to identify coreferent mentions are limited and prompt-sensitive, leading to inconsistent results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GPT知道谁是谁
共同参考解析是理解话语和语言的关键任务,但它尚未从大型语言模型(llm)中得到广泛的应用。此外,共参解析系统很大程度上依赖于监督标签,这是非常昂贵和难以注释的,从而使其成熟的快速工程。在本文中,我们引入了一种基于问答的提示工程方法,并识别出生成的、预先训练的法学硕士在共同参考解析任务中的能力和局限性。我们的实验表明,GPT-2和GPT-Neo可以返回有效的答案,但它们识别共同提及的能力有限且对时间敏感,导致结果不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What GPT Knows About Who is Who Pathologies of Pre-trained Language Models in Few-shot Fine-tuning Can Question Rewriting Help Conversational Question Answering? Extending the Scope of Out-of-Domain: Examining QA models in multiple subdomains Do Data-based Curricula Work?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1