The Existence of Human Rights

R. Alexy
{"title":"The Existence of Human Rights","authors":"R. Alexy","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198796831.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human rights are first, universal, second, fundamental, third, abstract, and fourth, moral rights that, fifth, take priority over all other norms. For the question of the existence of human rights, the fourth defining element, the moral character of human rights, is of special significance. The purely moral character distinguishes human rights from constitutional rights. Constitutional rights are positive law at the level of the constitution. This, however, is not to say that no connection exists between human rights and constitutional rights. On the contrary, constitutional rights have to be defined as rights that have been recorded in a constitution with the intention of transforming human rights into positive law. In this respect, constitutional rights have, along with their real dimension, an ideal dimension, that is, they have a dual nature. This implies that the problem of the existence of human rights is essential for constitutional rights, too. Now, human rights exist if they are justifiable. Eight justifications of human rights are considered: the religious, the biological, the intuitive, the consensual, the instrumental, the cultural, the explicative, and the existential. The result of this analysis is an explicative-existential justification, which, while not a perfect justification, is a good justification.","PeriodicalId":142448,"journal":{"name":"Law's Ideal Dimension","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law's Ideal Dimension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796831.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Human rights are first, universal, second, fundamental, third, abstract, and fourth, moral rights that, fifth, take priority over all other norms. For the question of the existence of human rights, the fourth defining element, the moral character of human rights, is of special significance. The purely moral character distinguishes human rights from constitutional rights. Constitutional rights are positive law at the level of the constitution. This, however, is not to say that no connection exists between human rights and constitutional rights. On the contrary, constitutional rights have to be defined as rights that have been recorded in a constitution with the intention of transforming human rights into positive law. In this respect, constitutional rights have, along with their real dimension, an ideal dimension, that is, they have a dual nature. This implies that the problem of the existence of human rights is essential for constitutional rights, too. Now, human rights exist if they are justifiable. Eight justifications of human rights are considered: the religious, the biological, the intuitive, the consensual, the instrumental, the cultural, the explicative, and the existential. The result of this analysis is an explicative-existential justification, which, while not a perfect justification, is a good justification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人权的存在
人权第一是普遍的权利,第二是基本的权利,第三是抽象的权利,第四是道义上的权利,第五是高于所有其他规范的权利。对于人权是否存在的问题,第四个界定要素,即人权的道德性质,具有特殊的意义。纯粹的道德属性将人权与宪法权利区分开来。宪法权利是宪法层面的成文法。然而,这并不是说人权和宪法权利之间没有联系。相反,宪法权利必须被定义为旨在将人权转化为成文法的宪法所记载的权利。在这方面,宪法权利除了具有现实维度外,还具有理想维度,即具有两重性。这意味着,人权的存在问题对宪法权利来说也是必不可少的。如果人权是正当的,那么它就存在。人权的八个理由被考虑:宗教的,生物的,直觉的,共识的,工具的,文化的,解释的,和存在的。这种分析的结果是一种说明性-存在性的论证,它虽然不是完美的论证,但却是一种好的论证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Discourse-Theoretical Conception of Practical Reason Law and Correctness Human Dignity and Proportionality An Answer to Joseph Raz Ideal ‘Ought’ and Optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1