Circumcision; A Comparative Study Between ZACH Self-Locking Clamp & Bone Cutter

Z. Choudhry
{"title":"Circumcision; A Comparative Study Between ZACH Self-Locking Clamp & Bone Cutter","authors":"Z. Choudhry","doi":"10.29054/APMC/2021.1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The circumcision has been performed for religious, ethnic and medical response. In Pakistan 85%-90% of circumcisions are performed by traditional circumcisers. The surgical technique for circumcision involves traditional bone cutter. Objective: To compare the results of one of the most commonly performed surgical procedure, circumcision, by bone cutter and ZACH self-locking circumcision clamp method in terms of complications such as trauma to glans, bleeding and infection along with cosmetic outcome. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Settings: Department of Surgery in Allied Hospital, Faisalabad Pakistan. Duration: September 2018 to November 2019. Methodology: Total 160 patients were selected from OPD on the basis of non-probability consecutive sampling. After careful history taking and physical examination, patients fulfilling the criteria were identified into two equal groups, one underwent circumcision with Bone Cutter and the other with Zach self-locking circumcision clamp. Parents were instructed to follow up in the surgical OPD after seven days for assessment and earlier in case of any complication. Results: There was significant difference in terms of bleeding, superficial infection, cosmetic appearance and trauma to glans (P-value > 0.05). Conclusion: Zach self-locking clamp proved to be safe and effective technique with reproducible results as compared to bone cutter.","PeriodicalId":319424,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Punjab Medical College","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Punjab Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29054/APMC/2021.1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The circumcision has been performed for religious, ethnic and medical response. In Pakistan 85%-90% of circumcisions are performed by traditional circumcisers. The surgical technique for circumcision involves traditional bone cutter. Objective: To compare the results of one of the most commonly performed surgical procedure, circumcision, by bone cutter and ZACH self-locking circumcision clamp method in terms of complications such as trauma to glans, bleeding and infection along with cosmetic outcome. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Settings: Department of Surgery in Allied Hospital, Faisalabad Pakistan. Duration: September 2018 to November 2019. Methodology: Total 160 patients were selected from OPD on the basis of non-probability consecutive sampling. After careful history taking and physical examination, patients fulfilling the criteria were identified into two equal groups, one underwent circumcision with Bone Cutter and the other with Zach self-locking circumcision clamp. Parents were instructed to follow up in the surgical OPD after seven days for assessment and earlier in case of any complication. Results: There was significant difference in terms of bleeding, superficial infection, cosmetic appearance and trauma to glans (P-value > 0.05). Conclusion: Zach self-locking clamp proved to be safe and effective technique with reproducible results as compared to bone cutter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包皮环切术;扎克自锁钳与骨刀的比较研究
背景:割礼是出于宗教、种族和医学的考虑。在巴基斯坦,85%-90%的包皮环切手术是由传统的包皮环切者进行的。包皮环切术的手术技术包括传统的骨切割机。目的:比较切骨钳与扎克自锁包皮环切钳在包皮环切术中最常见的并发症,如龟头损伤、出血、感染及美容效果。研究设计:随机对照试验。地点:巴基斯坦费萨拉巴德联合医院外科。时间:2018年9月至2019年11月。方法:采用非概率连续抽样方法,选取160例门诊患者。经过仔细的病史记录和体格检查,将符合标准的患者分为两组,一组使用Bone Cutter进行包皮环切,另一组使用Zach自锁式包皮环切钳。家长被要求在术后7天到外科门诊进行随访,以评估病情,并尽早发现并发症。结果:两组患者在出血、浅表感染、美容外观、龟头外伤方面差异均有统计学意义(p值> 0.05)。结论:与骨切割机相比,扎克自锁钳是一种安全有效的技术,结果可重复性好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Success Rate of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Between Women with Lower Segment Uterine Scar Thickness more than and less than 3.5mm Circumcision; A Comparative Study Between ZACH Self-Locking Clamp & Bone Cutter Comparison of Early and Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis Mean Lipid Profile among Patients Suffering from Oral Sub-mucous Fibrosis Reporting in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Karachi, Pakistan: A Descriptive Study Peril Elements of Infection Severity, Disease Non-Improvement, Case Fatality and Management of Sars-Cov-2 in Sargodha Region Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1