A Unified Approach to Architecture Conformance Checking

A. Caracciolo, M. Lungu, Oscar Nierstrasz
{"title":"A Unified Approach to Architecture Conformance Checking","authors":"A. Caracciolo, M. Lungu, Oscar Nierstrasz","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2015.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software erosion can be controlled by periodically checking for consistency between the de facto architecture and its theoretical counterpart. Studies show that this process is often not automated and that developers still rely heavily on manual reviews, despite the availability of a large number of tools. This is partially due to the high cost involved in setting up and maintaining tool-specific and incompatible test specifications that replicate otherwise documented invariants. To reduce this cost, our approach consists in unifying the functionality provided by existing tools under the umbrella of a common business-readable DSL. By using a declarative language, we are able to write tool-agnostic rules that are simple enough to be understood by untrained stakeholders and, at the same time, can be interpreted as a rigorous specification for checking architecture conformance.","PeriodicalId":414931,"journal":{"name":"2015 12th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 12th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2015.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Software erosion can be controlled by periodically checking for consistency between the de facto architecture and its theoretical counterpart. Studies show that this process is often not automated and that developers still rely heavily on manual reviews, despite the availability of a large number of tools. This is partially due to the high cost involved in setting up and maintaining tool-specific and incompatible test specifications that replicate otherwise documented invariants. To reduce this cost, our approach consists in unifying the functionality provided by existing tools under the umbrella of a common business-readable DSL. By using a declarative language, we are able to write tool-agnostic rules that are simple enough to be understood by untrained stakeholders and, at the same time, can be interpreted as a rigorous specification for checking architecture conformance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
架构一致性检查的统一方法
软件侵蚀可以通过定期检查事实体系结构和理论体系结构之间的一致性来控制。研究表明,这个过程通常不是自动化的,开发人员仍然严重依赖于手动审查,尽管有大量的工具可用。这部分是由于建立和维护特定于工具的和不兼容的测试规范所涉及的高成本,这些规范复制了其他记录的不变量。为了降低这种成本,我们的方法是将现有工具提供的功能统一到一个通用的业务可读DSL之下。通过使用声明性语言,我们能够编写与工具无关的规则,这些规则足够简单,可以被未经训练的涉众理解,同时可以被解释为检查体系结构一致性的严格规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Data Needs more Attention in Architecture Design - Experiences from Prototyping a Large-Scale Mobile App Ecosystem A Unified Approach to Architecture Conformance Checking Supporting Dynamic Software Architectures: From Architectural Description to Implementation A Conversation Based Approach for Modeling REST APIs Hotspot Patterns: The Formal Definition and Automatic Detection of Architecture Smells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1