Turning ‘evidence for development’ on its head: A view from Africa

Ruth Stewart
{"title":"Turning ‘evidence for development’ on its head: A view from Africa","authors":"Ruth Stewart","doi":"10.14324/RFA.05.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe ‘evidence for development’ community aims to produce research that is useful and used to address issues of poverty and inequality, largely in low- and middle-income countries (often referred to as the ‘global South’). The unspoken norm, however, is that much of the engagement, funding and attention is focused on organizations and individuals in the global North, with the assumption that they are effective in supporting the needs of the global South. In this research paper, I explore the initiatives and the individuals and organizations that are working within the ‘evidence for development’ community in Africa, using the lens of the African philosophy of ubuntu. I present findings from a programme of work undertaken across Africa to identify and better understand the innovation in evidence-informed decision-making taking place across the continent. I demonstrate that, while resource-poor and not well publicized, the evidence community in Africa is world leading in a number of respects. These include the interconnections within its continent-wide network, and the engagement of some governments within its ecosystem. Reflecting on these findings, I discuss and critique the underlying foundations of patriarchy, development and coloniality that shape the field of ‘evidence for development’. I highlight how, in an era of decoloniality, post-‘development’ and antipatriarchy, the ‘evidence for development’ community risks becoming outdated and being ineffective if it does not engage with the challenges inherent within these concepts. I argue that using the alternative lens of ubuntu enables us to celebrate the successes of Southern evidence communities, and to work together on a level footing with the North to tackle the challenges of poverty and inequality through better use of evidence.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research for All","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.05.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The ‘evidence for development’ community aims to produce research that is useful and used to address issues of poverty and inequality, largely in low- and middle-income countries (often referred to as the ‘global South’). The unspoken norm, however, is that much of the engagement, funding and attention is focused on organizations and individuals in the global North, with the assumption that they are effective in supporting the needs of the global South. In this research paper, I explore the initiatives and the individuals and organizations that are working within the ‘evidence for development’ community in Africa, using the lens of the African philosophy of ubuntu. I present findings from a programme of work undertaken across Africa to identify and better understand the innovation in evidence-informed decision-making taking place across the continent. I demonstrate that, while resource-poor and not well publicized, the evidence community in Africa is world leading in a number of respects. These include the interconnections within its continent-wide network, and the engagement of some governments within its ecosystem. Reflecting on these findings, I discuss and critique the underlying foundations of patriarchy, development and coloniality that shape the field of ‘evidence for development’. I highlight how, in an era of decoloniality, post-‘development’ and antipatriarchy, the ‘evidence for development’ community risks becoming outdated and being ineffective if it does not engage with the challenges inherent within these concepts. I argue that using the alternative lens of ubuntu enables us to celebrate the successes of Southern evidence communities, and to work together on a level footing with the North to tackle the challenges of poverty and inequality through better use of evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颠倒“发展证据”:来自非洲的观点
“发展证据”社区的目标是产生有用的研究,用于解决贫困和不平等问题,主要是在低收入和中等收入国家(通常被称为“全球南方”)。然而,不言而喻的准则是,大部分的参与、资金和关注都集中在全球北方的组织和个人身上,并假设他们能够有效地支持全球南方的需求。在这篇研究论文中,我用非洲乌班图哲学的视角,探讨了在非洲“发展证据”社区中工作的倡议、个人和组织。我将介绍在整个非洲开展的一项工作方案的调查结果,该方案旨在确定和更好地了解整个非洲大陆正在进行的循证决策方面的创新。我证明,尽管非洲的证据界资源贫乏,而且没有得到充分宣传,但它在许多方面都处于世界领先地位。这包括其整个大陆网络内的相互联系,以及一些政府在其生态系统内的参与。反思这些发现,我讨论和批评父权制、发展和殖民主义的潜在基础,这些基础塑造了“发展证据”领域。我强调,在一个非殖民化、后“发展”和反父权制的时代,如果不应对这些概念中固有的挑战,“发展证据”社区将面临过时和无效的风险。我认为,使用乌班图的另一种视角,使我们能够庆祝南方证据社区的成功,并与北方在平等的基础上共同努力,通过更好地利用证据来应对贫困和不平等的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stakeholder-engaged research: a multidisciplinary historical analysis A co-design exemplar: how to align with community goals when developing data collection methods with communities from refugee backgrounds Delivering citizen science online and hybrid: impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on recruitment and engagement Virtual Maths Circles: helping young people to think like researchers Virtual Maths Circles: helping young people to think like researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1