Stakeholder-engaged research: a multidisciplinary historical analysis

Jah Ying Chung
{"title":"Stakeholder-engaged research: a multidisciplinary historical analysis","authors":"Jah Ying Chung","doi":"10.14324/rfa.08.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe involvement of stakeholders in research – from design, production and communication to use – is recognised as essential to producing impactful research. However, approaches to involving stakeholders in research vary greatly between different fields. This article conducts a multidisciplinary historical analysis of stakeholder-engaged research to offer an integrated perspective on engagement practices across disciplines. It identifies common influences, objectives, trends and challenges, proposing frameworks to support interdisciplinary analysis and understanding. The analysis identifies interconnected approaches that could benefit from mutual learning and exchange. Approaches emerging from sociopolitical movements orient around objectives of empowerment and emancipation, those responding to complexity tend to focus on producing better research that solves societal problems, while accountability-driven approaches centre on research use and impact. This article broadens the diversity of approaches and epistemologies discussed in the literature by including disciplines neglected in previous reviews. Building on the widely cited three-generations model, it proposes a configuration- and complexity-based framework for comparing stakeholder-engaged research approaches, moving beyond the chronological conception of stakeholder-engaged research development. This multidisciplinary historical analysis provides a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners to understand the range of possible approaches to stakeholder engagement, facilitating approach selection for specific use cases and contexts, as well as opportunities for interdisciplinary learning and collaboration.\n","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research for All","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/rfa.08.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The involvement of stakeholders in research – from design, production and communication to use – is recognised as essential to producing impactful research. However, approaches to involving stakeholders in research vary greatly between different fields. This article conducts a multidisciplinary historical analysis of stakeholder-engaged research to offer an integrated perspective on engagement practices across disciplines. It identifies common influences, objectives, trends and challenges, proposing frameworks to support interdisciplinary analysis and understanding. The analysis identifies interconnected approaches that could benefit from mutual learning and exchange. Approaches emerging from sociopolitical movements orient around objectives of empowerment and emancipation, those responding to complexity tend to focus on producing better research that solves societal problems, while accountability-driven approaches centre on research use and impact. This article broadens the diversity of approaches and epistemologies discussed in the literature by including disciplines neglected in previous reviews. Building on the widely cited three-generations model, it proposes a configuration- and complexity-based framework for comparing stakeholder-engaged research approaches, moving beyond the chronological conception of stakeholder-engaged research development. This multidisciplinary historical analysis provides a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners to understand the range of possible approaches to stakeholder engagement, facilitating approach selection for specific use cases and contexts, as well as opportunities for interdisciplinary learning and collaboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者参与的研究:多学科历史分析
利益相关者参与研究--从设计、生产、交流到使用--被认为是产生有影响力的研究的关键。然而,不同领域让利益相关者参与研究的方法大相径庭。本文对利益相关者参与研究进行了多学科历史分析,为各学科的参与实践提供了一个综合视角。文章确定了共同的影响因素、目标、趋势和挑战,提出了支持跨学科分析和理解的框架。分析确定了可以从相互学习和交流中受益的相互关联的方法。从社会政治运动中产生的方法以赋权和解放为目标,应对复杂性的方法往往侧重于开展更好的研究以解决社会问题,而问责驱动的方法则以研究的使用和影响为中心。本文通过纳入以往评论中被忽视的学科,扩大了文献中讨论的方法和认识论的多样性。文章以被广泛引用的三代模型为基础,提出了一个基于配置和复杂性的框架,用于比较利益相关者参与研究的方法,超越了利益相关者参与研究发展的时间概念。这种多学科历史分析为学者和从业人员了解利益相关者参与的各种可能方法提供了宝贵的资源,有助于为特定的使用案例和环境选择方法,并为跨学科学习与合作提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stakeholder-engaged research: a multidisciplinary historical analysis A co-design exemplar: how to align with community goals when developing data collection methods with communities from refugee backgrounds Delivering citizen science online and hybrid: impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on recruitment and engagement Virtual Maths Circles: helping young people to think like researchers Virtual Maths Circles: helping young people to think like researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1