The Role of Political Polarization on American and Australian Trust and Media Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic

A. Carson, S. Ratcliff, L. Ruppanner
{"title":"The Role of Political Polarization on American and Australian Trust and Media Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"A. Carson, S. Ratcliff, L. Ruppanner","doi":"10.4324/9781003170051-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding citizens’ use and trust in media are essential during a global health crisis when governments need to provide reliable information to enact public measures to reduce rates of illness and death. This chapter examines these relationships through repeated surveys in two comparable liberal democracies, the USA and Australia, during the COVID-19 pandemic. It finds that news engagement increased markedly in both countries in 2020 during the pandemic with television and newspapers being the most relied upon sources. Media trust was higher for citizens who prioritized established news sources and medical experts for coronavirus information. Yet, there is clear evidence that people’s news preferences are associated with their level of concern about the virus and support for government measures to contain it. Trump supporters were more inclined to trust information from family and friends on social media than from professional journalists. They were the group least concerned about catching the virus and most dissatisfied with government lockdown measures. The chapter finds greater political and media polarization and partisan distrust of experts in the USA compared to Australia. It concludes that polarization has serious real-world consequences for governments’ capacities to protect public health in this time of crisis.","PeriodicalId":222394,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication in the Time of Coronavirus","volume":"199 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Communication in the Time of Coronavirus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003170051-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Understanding citizens’ use and trust in media are essential during a global health crisis when governments need to provide reliable information to enact public measures to reduce rates of illness and death. This chapter examines these relationships through repeated surveys in two comparable liberal democracies, the USA and Australia, during the COVID-19 pandemic. It finds that news engagement increased markedly in both countries in 2020 during the pandemic with television and newspapers being the most relied upon sources. Media trust was higher for citizens who prioritized established news sources and medical experts for coronavirus information. Yet, there is clear evidence that people’s news preferences are associated with their level of concern about the virus and support for government measures to contain it. Trump supporters were more inclined to trust information from family and friends on social media than from professional journalists. They were the group least concerned about catching the virus and most dissatisfied with government lockdown measures. The chapter finds greater political and media polarization and partisan distrust of experts in the USA compared to Australia. It concludes that polarization has serious real-world consequences for governments’ capacities to protect public health in this time of crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间政治两极分化对美国和澳大利亚信任和媒体使用的影响
在全球卫生危机期间,当政府需要提供可靠信息以制定公共措施以降低发病率和死亡率时,了解公民对媒体的使用和信任至关重要。本章通过在COVID-19大流行期间对美国和澳大利亚这两个可比较的自由民主国家的反复调查来研究这些关系。报告发现,在2020年大流行期间,这两个国家的新闻参与度显著增加,电视和报纸是最受依赖的新闻来源。那些优先考虑知名新闻来源和医学专家获取冠状病毒信息的公民对媒体的信任度更高。然而,有明确的证据表明,人们的新闻偏好与他们对病毒的关注程度以及对政府控制措施的支持程度有关。特朗普的支持者更倾向于相信社交媒体上来自家人和朋友的信息,而不是专业记者的信息。他们是最不担心感染病毒、对政府封锁措施最不满的群体。本章发现,与澳大利亚相比,美国的政治和媒体两极分化以及党派对专家的不信任更严重。报告的结论是,两极分化对政府在危机时刻保护公众健康的能力产生了严重的现实后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Political Polarization on American and Australian Trust and Media Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic From Consensus to Dissensus “I Don't Vote Because I Don't Want to Get Infected” COVID-19 in Chile When a Polarized Media System Meets a Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1