Introduction: Black Female Intellectuals in Historical and Contemporary Context

Rebecca J. Fraser, Imaobong D. Umoren
{"title":"Introduction: Black Female Intellectuals in Historical and Contemporary Context","authors":"Rebecca J. Fraser, Imaobong D. Umoren","doi":"10.1080/14775700.2022.2054585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of Comparative American Studies, Black Female Intellectuals in Historical and Contemporary Context, developed as part of an AHRC-funded network project over the past three years. This issue draws together several new and innovative essays that add to the field of intellectual histories, importantly expanding on understandings of Black female intellectuals as a discrete and distinct cohort within the wider terms of both ‘Black intellectuals’ and ‘the intellectual’. Importantly, the collection fosters understandings of Black female intellectuals and their actions as both activism (doing) and thought (thinking). Since the earliest years of the transatlantic slave trade in the mid-16th century, women across the Black diaspora have been central to the development of intellectual communities. These have often been grounded in ideals of activism and resistance against racial stereotyping and reductive categories of thought. Yet, the history of the Black intellectual, as defined by previous scholars such as Wilson Moses (2004) and Manning Marable (1998), has presented a somewhat limited interpretation of who might count under this term. Understandings of the Black intellectual in the minds of a non-specialist audience has been largely shaped by previous scholarly understandings of the Black intellectual as typically gendered as male, contributing to regional or national public discourses of the United States, beginning from the early 20th century, through speeches, lectures, and essays. Some excellent scholarship has been published since the late 1980s critiquing this centring of the Black male, and reflecting on Black women’s participation in the intellectual communities of the Black Atlantic (see, e.g. Carby 1987; Peterson 1995; Taylor 2002; Waters and Conaway 2007; Davies 2008; Jones; Bay 2010; Zackodnik, 2011; Bay et al. 2015; Umoren 2018; Blain 2021, 2018; Brooks 2021). Scholars have also begun revisiting the term ‘intellectual’ and widening it out to include activities at a more local level so to include Black women within this conceptual framework (see, e.g. Higginbotham 1993; Dodson 2002; Waters and Conaway 2007; Fraser 2018; Fraser and Griffin 2020). This conceptual broadening of the term as regards what the intellectual does and where she does it from will form one of the central themes of this special issue.","PeriodicalId":114563,"journal":{"name":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2022.2054585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue of Comparative American Studies, Black Female Intellectuals in Historical and Contemporary Context, developed as part of an AHRC-funded network project over the past three years. This issue draws together several new and innovative essays that add to the field of intellectual histories, importantly expanding on understandings of Black female intellectuals as a discrete and distinct cohort within the wider terms of both ‘Black intellectuals’ and ‘the intellectual’. Importantly, the collection fosters understandings of Black female intellectuals and their actions as both activism (doing) and thought (thinking). Since the earliest years of the transatlantic slave trade in the mid-16th century, women across the Black diaspora have been central to the development of intellectual communities. These have often been grounded in ideals of activism and resistance against racial stereotyping and reductive categories of thought. Yet, the history of the Black intellectual, as defined by previous scholars such as Wilson Moses (2004) and Manning Marable (1998), has presented a somewhat limited interpretation of who might count under this term. Understandings of the Black intellectual in the minds of a non-specialist audience has been largely shaped by previous scholarly understandings of the Black intellectual as typically gendered as male, contributing to regional or national public discourses of the United States, beginning from the early 20th century, through speeches, lectures, and essays. Some excellent scholarship has been published since the late 1980s critiquing this centring of the Black male, and reflecting on Black women’s participation in the intellectual communities of the Black Atlantic (see, e.g. Carby 1987; Peterson 1995; Taylor 2002; Waters and Conaway 2007; Davies 2008; Jones; Bay 2010; Zackodnik, 2011; Bay et al. 2015; Umoren 2018; Blain 2021, 2018; Brooks 2021). Scholars have also begun revisiting the term ‘intellectual’ and widening it out to include activities at a more local level so to include Black women within this conceptual framework (see, e.g. Higginbotham 1993; Dodson 2002; Waters and Conaway 2007; Fraser 2018; Fraser and Griffin 2020). This conceptual broadening of the term as regards what the intellectual does and where she does it from will form one of the central themes of this special issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导论:历史与当代语境中的黑人女性知识分子
这期《比较美国研究》的特刊,历史与当代背景下的黑人女性知识分子,是过去三年美国人权协会资助的网络项目的一部分。这一期汇集了一些新的和创新的文章,增加了知识分子历史的领域,重要的是扩大了对黑人女性知识分子作为一个离散的和独特的群体的理解,在更广泛的“黑人知识分子”和“知识分子”的范围内。重要的是,这本合集促进了对黑人女性知识分子的理解,以及她们作为行动主义(行动)和思想(思考)的行为。自16世纪中期跨大西洋奴隶贸易开始以来,散居海外的黑人女性一直是知识群体发展的核心。这些通常是基于行动主义和抵制种族刻板印象和简化的思想类别的理想。然而,由威尔逊·摩西(Wilson Moses, 2004)和曼宁·马拉布尔(Manning Marable, 1998)等先前的学者所定义的黑人知识分子的历史,对哪些人可以算在这个术语下,给出了多少有限的解释。非专业观众对黑人知识分子的理解在很大程度上是由之前的学术对黑人知识分子的典型性别为男性的理解所塑造的,从20世纪初开始,通过演讲、讲座和论文,为美国的地区或国家公共话语做出了贡献。自20世纪80年代末以来,已经发表了一些优秀的学术论文,批评这种以黑人男性为中心的现象,并反思黑人女性参与黑人大西洋知识社区的情况(参见,例如Carby 1987;皮特森1995;泰勒2002年;Waters and Conaway 2007;戴维斯2008;琼斯;湾2010;Zackodnik, 2011;Bay et al. 2015;Umoren 2018;Blain 2021, 2018;布鲁克斯2021年)。学者们也开始重新审视“知识分子”一词,并将其扩大到包括更多地方层面的活动,以便将黑人妇女包括在这个概念框架内(参见,例如希金波坦1993;Dodson 2002;Waters and Conaway 2007;弗雷泽2018;弗雷泽和格里芬2020)。知识分子做了什么,从何而来,这一概念的扩展将成为本期特刊的中心主题之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Town Savior or Scourge? Asian Identity in the Western and Generic Reversal in 7 Faces of Dr. Lao (1964) Discovering the Living Fossil Short Story in the Late Nineteenth Century A Christmas Carol In Nineteenth-Century America, 1844-1870 ‘Every Child Rises Early on Christmas Morning to See the Johnkannaus’ [Harriet Jacobs]: The Competing Meanings of Christmas for the Enslaved in North Carolina “A Commission from Heaven”: The Legacy of Lorenzo de Zavala’s Enlightenment Discourse on Texas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1