UX Methods as Transformative Institutional Change: Stacey Abrams’ Georgia Campaign as a Formative Example

Emily L.W. Bowers, E. Harris, Ruby R. Mendoza
{"title":"UX Methods as Transformative Institutional Change: Stacey Abrams’ Georgia Campaign as a Formative Example","authors":"Emily L.W. Bowers, E. Harris, Ruby R. Mendoza","doi":"10.1109/ProComm53155.2022.00090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contends with the idea that User Experience Design (UXD and UX) approaches can be used to create institutional and organizational change, not just within the digital realm to develop products and services for individuals. Incorporating the rhetorical methodology of institutional critique and adding intersectional complexity as a critical framework to drive our analysis, the authors examine Stacey Abrams’ 2016 gubernatorial campaign in Georgia and continued voting rights work as a formative example to showcase how creating civic change against Eurocentric tendencies happens at the interpersonal, structural, and institutional levels. The article’s purpose is to signify that UXD can create institutional change when informed by direct participation of people most impacted by the laws, policies, and legislation (products and services developed by particular bodies) and historic and embodied knowledge of systemic oppression, which happens most effectively when also providing accessible and tangible support to those who do not have access to resources people need to participate. The key hope of the authors in writing this piece is that it will help professional communicators and those outside communication fields consider ways UX methods can engage in transformative institutional change.","PeriodicalId":286504,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm53155.2022.00090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article contends with the idea that User Experience Design (UXD and UX) approaches can be used to create institutional and organizational change, not just within the digital realm to develop products and services for individuals. Incorporating the rhetorical methodology of institutional critique and adding intersectional complexity as a critical framework to drive our analysis, the authors examine Stacey Abrams’ 2016 gubernatorial campaign in Georgia and continued voting rights work as a formative example to showcase how creating civic change against Eurocentric tendencies happens at the interpersonal, structural, and institutional levels. The article’s purpose is to signify that UXD can create institutional change when informed by direct participation of people most impacted by the laws, policies, and legislation (products and services developed by particular bodies) and historic and embodied knowledge of systemic oppression, which happens most effectively when also providing accessible and tangible support to those who do not have access to resources people need to participate. The key hope of the authors in writing this piece is that it will help professional communicators and those outside communication fields consider ways UX methods can engage in transformative institutional change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为变革性制度变革的用户体验方法:斯泰西·艾布拉姆斯的乔治亚州竞选作为一个形成性的例子
本文认为,用户体验设计(UXD和UX)方法可以用于创建制度和组织变革,而不仅仅是在数字领域为个人开发产品和服务。结合制度批判的修辞方法,并增加交叉复杂性作为推动我们分析的关键框架,作者研究了斯泰西·艾布拉姆斯2016年在佐治亚州的州长竞选活动,并将继续投票权工作作为一个形成性的例子,以展示如何在人际、结构和制度层面上创造反对欧洲中心主义倾向的公民变革。这篇文章的目的是表明,当受法律、政策和立法(由特定机构开发的产品和服务)影响最大的人们直接参与以及对系统性压迫的历史和具体知识的了解时,UXD可以创造制度变革,当为那些无法获得人们需要参与的资源的人提供可访问和有形的支持时,这种情况最有效地发生。作者写这篇文章的主要希望是,它将帮助专业传播者和传播领域之外的人考虑UX方法可以参与变革性制度变革的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Technical Communication in China: Program Building and Industrial Trends Teaching Engineering Writing through Rhetorical Genre Studies UX Methods as Transformative Institutional Change: Stacey Abrams’ Georgia Campaign as a Formative Example (Un)housed and (Un)heard: The Power of Narrative in Reimagining Long-Term Crisis Communication Extended Abstract: NSF Merit Review Criteria as Points of Entry for Advancing Social Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1