FDTD simulation of grounding electrodes considering soil ionization

K. Otani, Y. Shiraki, Y. Baba, N. Nagaoka, A. Ametani, N. Itamoto
{"title":"FDTD simulation of grounding electrodes considering soil ionization","authors":"K. Otani, Y. Shiraki, Y. Baba, N. Nagaoka, A. Ametani, N. Itamoto","doi":"10.1109/ICLP.2012.6344295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If an impulse or surge high current flows in a grounding electrode, the soil in the vicinity of the grounding electrode would be ionized and the voltage generated at the top of the grounding electrode would be reduced. Recently, Ala et al. (2008) have proposed a soil ionization model, on the basis of the dynamic soil-resistivity model of Liew and Darveniza (1974), for finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) computations. In the model, the resistivity of each soil-representing cell is controlled by the instantaneous value of the electric field there and time. Ala et al. have tested the validity of the model against experiments on a single vertical grounding rod having two different lengths: 0.61 m and 3.05 m, into which a simple-shape unipolar high current is injected. In this paper, the model is applied to analyzing the surge responses of four parallel vertical grounding rods of length 3.05 m and a single horizontal grounding conductor having two different lengths: 8.1 m and 34 m to a single-peak unipolar high current, and the FDTD-computed responses are compared with the corresponding ones measured by Bellaschi et al. (1942) and Sekioka et al. (1998). Furthermore, it is applied to analyzing the surge responses of a 1-m single vertical grounding rod and a 5-m single horizontal grounding conductor to a double-peak unipolar high current. The FDTD-computed responses are then compared with the corresponding ones measured by Geri et al. (1992).","PeriodicalId":400743,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP.2012.6344295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

If an impulse or surge high current flows in a grounding electrode, the soil in the vicinity of the grounding electrode would be ionized and the voltage generated at the top of the grounding electrode would be reduced. Recently, Ala et al. (2008) have proposed a soil ionization model, on the basis of the dynamic soil-resistivity model of Liew and Darveniza (1974), for finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) computations. In the model, the resistivity of each soil-representing cell is controlled by the instantaneous value of the electric field there and time. Ala et al. have tested the validity of the model against experiments on a single vertical grounding rod having two different lengths: 0.61 m and 3.05 m, into which a simple-shape unipolar high current is injected. In this paper, the model is applied to analyzing the surge responses of four parallel vertical grounding rods of length 3.05 m and a single horizontal grounding conductor having two different lengths: 8.1 m and 34 m to a single-peak unipolar high current, and the FDTD-computed responses are compared with the corresponding ones measured by Bellaschi et al. (1942) and Sekioka et al. (1998). Furthermore, it is applied to analyzing the surge responses of a 1-m single vertical grounding rod and a 5-m single horizontal grounding conductor to a double-peak unipolar high current. The FDTD-computed responses are then compared with the corresponding ones measured by Geri et al. (1992).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑土壤电离的接地电极时域有限差分模拟
当脉冲或浪涌大电流流过接地电极时,接地电极附近的土壤会被电离,从而使接地电极顶部产生的电压降低。最近,Ala等人(2008)在Liew和Darveniza(1974)的动态土壤电阻率模型的基础上,提出了一种用于时域有限差分(FDTD)计算的土壤电离模型。在该模型中,每个土壤代表单元的电阻率由该单元的电场瞬时值和时间控制。Ala等人在一个垂直接地棒上进行了实验,该接地棒有两种不同的长度:0.61 m和3.05 m,并注入了简单形状的单极高电流,从而验证了该模型的有效性。本文应用该模型分析了长度为3.05 m的4根平行垂直接地棒和长度为8.1 m和34 m的单个水平接地导体对单峰单极大电流的浪涌响应,并将fdt计算的响应与Bellaschi et al.(1942)和Sekioka et al.(1998)的相应测量结果进行了比较。应用该方法分析了1m的单垂直接地棒和5m的单水平接地导体对双峰单极大电流的浪涌响应。然后将fdtd计算的响应与Geri等人(1992)测量的相应响应进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Two unprecedented experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of lightning protection systems Investigations of earth termination systems with respect to optimised step voltages Estimation of the minimum shielding failure current causing flashover in overhead lines of the hellenic transmission system through ATP-EMTP simulations Calculating the Lightning Protection System downconductors' grounding resistance at Launch Complex 39B, Kennedy Space Center, Florida Factors influencing the selection and installation of surge protective devices for low voltage systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1