Challenges in Obtaining Informed Consent in Qualitative Research and Suggestions to Improve It- A Descriptive Qualitative Study

Sindhuri R, A. Dongre
{"title":"Challenges in Obtaining Informed Consent in Qualitative Research and Suggestions to Improve It- A Descriptive Qualitative Study","authors":"Sindhuri R, A. Dongre","doi":"10.55489/njcm.140620232874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The dynamic and flexible nature of qualitative studies is expected to impose new challenges upon the researchers in obtaining informed consent. The study objectives were to explore the challenges perceived by the researchers in obtaining informed consent in qualitative research and their suggestions to improve it.\nMaterial and Methods: It was a descriptive qualitative study in which In-depth interviews were conducted among ten qualitative researchers purposively selected from one medical college in Puducherry. Transcripts prepared from the audio recordings were thematically analyzed manually.\nResults: The challenges identified were inadequate knowledge of the researcher in designing qualitative consent form, reluctance to sign consent document by participant, ensuring confidentiality and risk benefit communication. The main suggestions provided by the participants were to use of multimedia tools to improve their understanding and creating a rapport to enhance their trust to participate in the study.\nConclusions: Since most of the challenges were related to the reluctance of participants to provide consent due to various reasons and lack of adequate knowledge of the researcher, creating a good rapport with the participants and providing simple information through multimedia approaches and ethical training of qualitative researchers will aid us to overcome majority of these challenges.","PeriodicalId":430059,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Community Medicine","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55489/njcm.140620232874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The dynamic and flexible nature of qualitative studies is expected to impose new challenges upon the researchers in obtaining informed consent. The study objectives were to explore the challenges perceived by the researchers in obtaining informed consent in qualitative research and their suggestions to improve it. Material and Methods: It was a descriptive qualitative study in which In-depth interviews were conducted among ten qualitative researchers purposively selected from one medical college in Puducherry. Transcripts prepared from the audio recordings were thematically analyzed manually. Results: The challenges identified were inadequate knowledge of the researcher in designing qualitative consent form, reluctance to sign consent document by participant, ensuring confidentiality and risk benefit communication. The main suggestions provided by the participants were to use of multimedia tools to improve their understanding and creating a rapport to enhance their trust to participate in the study. Conclusions: Since most of the challenges were related to the reluctance of participants to provide consent due to various reasons and lack of adequate knowledge of the researcher, creating a good rapport with the participants and providing simple information through multimedia approaches and ethical training of qualitative researchers will aid us to overcome majority of these challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质性研究中获取知情同意的挑战及改进建议-一项描述性质的研究
定性研究的动态性和灵活性给研究人员在获取知情同意方面提出了新的挑战。研究目的是探讨研究人员在定性研究中获得知情同意所面临的挑战,以及他们提出的改进建议。材料与方法:本研究为描述性质的研究,在深度访谈中,有目的地从普杜切里的一所医学院中选择10名质的研究人员。从音频记录中准备的文本是手动按主题分析的。结果:研究人员在设计定性同意书方面的知识不足,参与者不愿签署同意书,确保保密和风险利益沟通。参与者提供的主要建议是使用多媒体工具来提高他们的理解和建立融洽的关系,以增强他们参与研究的信任。结论:由于大多数挑战与参与者由于各种原因和缺乏足够的研究人员知识而不愿意提供同意有关,因此与参与者建立良好的关系,并通过多媒体方法和定性研究人员的道德培训提供简单的信息,将有助于我们克服大多数这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Community Directed Interventional Approach to Promote Breast Self-Examination Through BEHENA Among Women Residing in Rural Villages of Hingna, Nagpur District Psychological Stress in Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder The Psychological Effects of Hormonal Treatment on Women Under IVF Treatment: A Comprehensive Review Stress Among Working Women: A Silent Serpent Overview, Trends and Mapping of The Scientific Production on Childhood Tuberculosis: A Scientometric Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1