Towards Secure Agile Software Development Process: A Practice-Based Model

Abdulhamid A. Ardo, J. Bass, T. Gaber
{"title":"Towards Secure Agile Software Development Process: A Practice-Based Model","authors":"Abdulhamid A. Ardo, J. Bass, T. Gaber","doi":"10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agile methods are a well-established paradigm in the software development field. Agile adoption has contributed to improving software quality. However, software products are vulnerable to security challenges and susceptible to cyberattacks. This study aims to improve security of software products when using an agile software development process. A multi-methods qualitative research approach was adopted in this study. First, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 agile practitioners having varied years of cybersecurity experiences. An approach informed by grounded theory methodology was adopted for data analysis. Second, we developed a novel practice-based agile software development process model derived from the results of the data analysis conducted. Third, we validated the model through a focus group comprising five senior agile cybersecurity professionals to evaluate its relevancy and novelty. The study has identified 26 security practices, organized into the six - software development life-cycle phases: planning, requirements, design, implementation, testing, and deployment. We have mapped the practices onto four swim lanes each representing an agile role. The self-organizing team is exclusively involved in three security practices, the security specialist in nine, penetration tester in one and the DevOps team collaborates on one with the security specialist. There are also seven practices that are collaboratively performed by the self-organizing team and the security specialist. Each of the practices in the model was examined during the validation phase of the study. There are two contributions in this study. First, the paper proposes a novel practice-based model comprising of 26 security practices mapped to agile roles. Second, we propose a new practice, in response to an observed lack of collaborative ceremonies, to disseminate awareness of and hence compliance with security standards.","PeriodicalId":269970,"journal":{"name":"2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Agile methods are a well-established paradigm in the software development field. Agile adoption has contributed to improving software quality. However, software products are vulnerable to security challenges and susceptible to cyberattacks. This study aims to improve security of software products when using an agile software development process. A multi-methods qualitative research approach was adopted in this study. First, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 agile practitioners having varied years of cybersecurity experiences. An approach informed by grounded theory methodology was adopted for data analysis. Second, we developed a novel practice-based agile software development process model derived from the results of the data analysis conducted. Third, we validated the model through a focus group comprising five senior agile cybersecurity professionals to evaluate its relevancy and novelty. The study has identified 26 security practices, organized into the six - software development life-cycle phases: planning, requirements, design, implementation, testing, and deployment. We have mapped the practices onto four swim lanes each representing an agile role. The self-organizing team is exclusively involved in three security practices, the security specialist in nine, penetration tester in one and the DevOps team collaborates on one with the security specialist. There are also seven practices that are collaboratively performed by the self-organizing team and the security specialist. Each of the practices in the model was examined during the validation phase of the study. There are two contributions in this study. First, the paper proposes a novel practice-based model comprising of 26 security practices mapped to agile roles. Second, we propose a new practice, in response to an observed lack of collaborative ceremonies, to disseminate awareness of and hence compliance with security standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向安全的敏捷软件开发过程:一个基于实践的模型
敏捷方法是软件开发领域公认的范例。采用敏捷有助于提高软件质量。然而,软件产品容易受到安全挑战,容易受到网络攻击。本研究旨在利用敏捷软件开发过程来提高软件产品的安全性。本研究采用多方法定性研究方法。首先,我们对23名拥有不同网络安全经验的敏捷实践者进行了半结构化访谈。采用扎根理论方法进行数据分析。其次,根据数据分析的结果,建立了一种新的基于实践的敏捷软件开发过程模型。第三,我们通过一个由五名高级敏捷网络安全专业人员组成的焦点小组来验证该模型,以评估其相关性和新颖性。该研究确定了26种安全实践,并将其分为6个软件开发生命周期阶段:计划、需求、设计、实现、测试和部署。我们将实践映射到四条泳道上,每条泳道代表一个敏捷角色。自组织团队只参与三种安全实践,安全专家参与九种,渗透测试人员参与一种,DevOps团队与安全专家合作一种。还有7个实践是由自组织团队和安全专家协作执行的。在研究的验证阶段,对模型中的每个实践进行了检查。这项研究有两个贡献。首先,本文提出了一个新的基于实践的模型,该模型由26个映射到敏捷角色的安全实践组成。其次,我们提出了一个新的实践,作为对观察到的缺乏协作仪式的回应,以传播安全标准的意识并因此遵守安全标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Service Classification through Machine Learning: Aiding in the Efficient Identification of Reusable Assets in Cloud Application Development Handling Environmental Uncertainty in Design Time Access Control Analysis How are software datasets constructed in Empirical Software Engineering studies? A systematic mapping study Microservices smell detection through dynamic analysis Towards Secure Agile Software Development Process: A Practice-Based Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1