Iraq and the mutual accumulation strategy between the international and regional powers: The United States of America and Iran are a model

S. Hadi, Noor Abdul-Ilah Ajrash
{"title":"Iraq and the mutual accumulation strategy between the international and regional powers: The United States of America and Iran are a model","authors":"S. Hadi, Noor Abdul-Ilah Ajrash","doi":"10.25130/POLTIC.V0I21.236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rules of (mutual accumulation strategy) overshadow the history of the crisis relations between the United States of America and Iran four decades ago, and if we recall that, we will notice several collision joints between the two parties, starting with the hostage crisis of the American embassy in Iran from 4/11/1979 to 20 / 1/1981 AD, to the \"Marines\" attempt to storm this embassy in an operation called \"Eagle Claw\" on 4/24/1980 AD, to the tanker war in the eighties of the last century, to the exchange of downing drones in 2019, and finally what happened between the United States The United States and Iran from the moment targeting (Qassem Soleimani), commander of the \"Quds Force\" on 1/3/2020, until the Iranian missile response and targeting of the American forces in the two \"Ain al-Assad\" bases in Anbar province, and the \"Harir\" base in Arbil province on 1/8/ 2020 AD, all of this falls within the context of (mutual accumulation strategy) between the two parties, without going to a comprehensive confrontation through war or a knockout, because the logic of war or comprehensive confrontation is outside the political and military mindsets of the two parties, and the meaning of all of this is that turmoil forms the basis of the relationship between the states The The United States and Iran, because the turmoil and the limited clash with it through mutual strikes, do not necessarily lead to an open clash.","PeriodicalId":297047,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal For Political Science","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal For Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/POLTIC.V0I21.236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rules of (mutual accumulation strategy) overshadow the history of the crisis relations between the United States of America and Iran four decades ago, and if we recall that, we will notice several collision joints between the two parties, starting with the hostage crisis of the American embassy in Iran from 4/11/1979 to 20 / 1/1981 AD, to the "Marines" attempt to storm this embassy in an operation called "Eagle Claw" on 4/24/1980 AD, to the tanker war in the eighties of the last century, to the exchange of downing drones in 2019, and finally what happened between the United States The United States and Iran from the moment targeting (Qassem Soleimani), commander of the "Quds Force" on 1/3/2020, until the Iranian missile response and targeting of the American forces in the two "Ain al-Assad" bases in Anbar province, and the "Harir" base in Arbil province on 1/8/ 2020 AD, all of this falls within the context of (mutual accumulation strategy) between the two parties, without going to a comprehensive confrontation through war or a knockout, because the logic of war or comprehensive confrontation is outside the political and military mindsets of the two parties, and the meaning of all of this is that turmoil forms the basis of the relationship between the states The The United States and Iran, because the turmoil and the limited clash with it through mutual strikes, do not necessarily lead to an open clash.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉克与国际和地区大国之间的相互积累战略:美国和伊朗是一个典范
规则(共同积累策略)掩盖的历史危机美国和伊朗的关系四十年前,如果我们回忆,我们会注意到一些冲突双方之间的关节,从美国驻伊朗大使馆人质危机4/11/1979 20 / 1/1981广告,“海军陆战队”试图风暴这大使馆在一个操作称为“鹰爪拳”4/24/1980广告,油轮战争年代的上个世纪,到2019年互击落无人机,再到美伊之间从2020年1月3日针对“圣城军”指挥官(卡西姆·索莱马尼)的那一时刻,到2020年1月8日伊朗对美军在安巴尔省的两个“阿萨德”基地和埃尔比勒省的“哈里”基地的导弹回应和瞄准,这一切都属于双方(相互积累战略)的背景。而不是通过战争或淘汰赛来进行全面对抗,因为战争或全面对抗的逻辑是在双方的政治和军事思维之外的,而这一切的意义在于,动荡形成了国与国之间关系的基础。美国和伊朗,因为动荡以及通过相互打击与之发生的有限冲突,并不一定会导致公开冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
العدالة المناخية بين الدول: عالم الشمال والجنوب (دراسة مقارنة) "The relationship between the public budget deficit and public debt in Egypt for the period from 2011-2020" Cyber Threats and Their Impact on the U.S. National Security الهندسة السياسية لكوريا الجنوبية : رؤية في الطبيعة والتحولات Challenges to Sustainable Development in Iraq: Human Security Issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1