Trustrace: Improving Automated Trace Retrieval through Resource Trust Analysis

Nasir Ali
{"title":"Trustrace: Improving Automated Trace Retrieval through Resource Trust Analysis","authors":"Nasir Ali","doi":"10.1109/ICPC.2011.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traceability is a task to create/recover traceability links among different software artifacts. It uses resources, such as an expert, source and target document, and traceability approach, to create/recover traceability links. However, it does not provide any guidance that how much we can trust on available resources. We propose Trustrace, a trust-based traceability recovery process, to improve expert trust on a recovered link and trust over the traceability inputs. Trustrace has three sub components, in particular, Link trust improver (LTI), traceability factor controller (TFC), and a hybrid traceability approach (HTA). LTI uses various source of information, such as temporal information, design documents, source code structure, and so on, to increase experts' trust over a link. To develop TFC, we will perform a systematic literature review and empirical studies to find out which factors impact the traceability-process inputs and document these factors in a trust pattern. TFC trust pattern will help practitioner and researchers to know which steps they can take to avoid/control these factors to improve their trust on these inputs. In the HTA, we will combine different traceability recovery approaches. All approaches have different positive and negative points, we will combine all the positive points of different approaches to increase experts' trust over the HTA. In Trustrace, HTA will implement the LTI model following TFC instructions to improve the expert trust over recovered link as well as precision and recall.","PeriodicalId":345601,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 19th International Conference on Program Comprehension","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 19th International Conference on Program Comprehension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2011.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Traceability is a task to create/recover traceability links among different software artifacts. It uses resources, such as an expert, source and target document, and traceability approach, to create/recover traceability links. However, it does not provide any guidance that how much we can trust on available resources. We propose Trustrace, a trust-based traceability recovery process, to improve expert trust on a recovered link and trust over the traceability inputs. Trustrace has three sub components, in particular, Link trust improver (LTI), traceability factor controller (TFC), and a hybrid traceability approach (HTA). LTI uses various source of information, such as temporal information, design documents, source code structure, and so on, to increase experts' trust over a link. To develop TFC, we will perform a systematic literature review and empirical studies to find out which factors impact the traceability-process inputs and document these factors in a trust pattern. TFC trust pattern will help practitioner and researchers to know which steps they can take to avoid/control these factors to improve their trust on these inputs. In the HTA, we will combine different traceability recovery approaches. All approaches have different positive and negative points, we will combine all the positive points of different approaches to increase experts' trust over the HTA. In Trustrace, HTA will implement the LTI model following TFC instructions to improve the expert trust over recovered link as well as precision and recall.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任:通过资源信任分析改进自动跟踪检索
可追溯性是在不同软件工件之间创建/恢复可追溯性链接的任务。它使用资源,例如专家、源和目标文档以及可跟踪性方法,来创建/恢复可跟踪性链接。然而,它并没有提供任何指导,说明我们可以在多大程度上信任现有资源。我们提出了基于信任的可追溯性恢复过程Trustrace,以提高专家对恢复链接的信任和对可追溯性输入的信任。Trustrace有三个子组件,特别是链接信任改进器(LTI)、可跟踪性因素控制器(TFC)和混合可跟踪性方法(HTA)。LTI使用各种信息源(例如时间信息、设计文档、源代码结构等)来增加专家对链接的信任。为了发展TFC,我们将进行系统的文献综述和实证研究,以找出影响可追溯性过程输入的因素,并将这些因素记录在信任模式中。TFC信任模式将帮助从业者和研究人员了解他们可以采取哪些步骤来避免/控制这些因素,以提高他们对这些输入的信任。在HTA中,我们将结合不同的可追溯性恢复方法。所有方法都有不同的优点和缺点,我们将不同方法的优点结合起来,以增加专家对HTA的信任。在Trustrace中,HTA将按照TFC的指示实施LTI模型,以提高专家对恢复链接的信任以及准确性和召回率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Precise and Scalable Querying of Syntactical Source Code Patterns Using Sample Code Snippets and a Database Comparison of a Visual and a Textual Notation to Express Data Constraints in Aspect-Oriented Join Point Selections: A Controlled Experiment Trustrace: Improving Automated Trace Retrieval through Resource Trust Analysis Generating Parameter Comments and Integrating with Method Summaries The NiCad Clone Detector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1