Serum uric acid and acute stroke outcome in Nigerian Africans

F. Imarhiagbe, J. Idemudia
{"title":"Serum uric acid and acute stroke outcome in Nigerian Africans","authors":"F. Imarhiagbe, J. Idemudia","doi":"10.4103/0331-3131.108125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Serum uric acid (SUA) has long been recognized as a potent antioxidant in plasma and increasingly its prognostic value and therapeutic role in acute stroke has been proven in different population groups. Aim: To assess the role of admission SUA in acute stroke outcome in a Nigerian population. Setting: A tertiary neurologic care center in Nigeria. Design: Prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: Total 240 acute stroke patients aged 30-91 years with first-ever stroke had their blood samples taken consecutively for SUA and blood sugar within 48 hours of onset of stroke symptoms. All were followed-up for outcome within 42 days from the date of admission. Outcome was either discharged to follow-up and still in care or in-hospital death. Stroke subtypes were defined by cranial computed tomography (CT) scan; stroke severity was assessed by the admission Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Statistics: Age, sex, SUA, blood sugar and GCS were compared between the stroke outcome groups. SUA and stroke outcome was tested on simple logistic regression after adjustment for age above 60 years and elevated blood sugar above 200 mg/dl. The contribution of SUA, blood sugar, age, stroke subtype and GCS to time of all cause in-hospital mortality was tested on Cox regression. Results: 1) Mean SUA, age and blood sugar were higher and mean GCS was lower in the deceased group (P < 0.001, 0.001, 0.001 and 0.001). 2) SUA predicted poorer outcome of acute stroke after adjustment for age above 60 years and blood glucose level above 200 mg/dl (P = 0.045, n = 96). 3) SUA, blood glucose and age predicted time to in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001, 0.047, <0.001). Conclusion: SUA predicts poorer outcome and time to all cause in-hospital mortality in acute stroke and may also become a reliable surrogate of acute stroke outcome in Africans as shown in other populations.","PeriodicalId":331118,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nigerian Medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nigerian Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0331-3131.108125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background : Serum uric acid (SUA) has long been recognized as a potent antioxidant in plasma and increasingly its prognostic value and therapeutic role in acute stroke has been proven in different population groups. Aim: To assess the role of admission SUA in acute stroke outcome in a Nigerian population. Setting: A tertiary neurologic care center in Nigeria. Design: Prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: Total 240 acute stroke patients aged 30-91 years with first-ever stroke had their blood samples taken consecutively for SUA and blood sugar within 48 hours of onset of stroke symptoms. All were followed-up for outcome within 42 days from the date of admission. Outcome was either discharged to follow-up and still in care or in-hospital death. Stroke subtypes were defined by cranial computed tomography (CT) scan; stroke severity was assessed by the admission Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Statistics: Age, sex, SUA, blood sugar and GCS were compared between the stroke outcome groups. SUA and stroke outcome was tested on simple logistic regression after adjustment for age above 60 years and elevated blood sugar above 200 mg/dl. The contribution of SUA, blood sugar, age, stroke subtype and GCS to time of all cause in-hospital mortality was tested on Cox regression. Results: 1) Mean SUA, age and blood sugar were higher and mean GCS was lower in the deceased group (P < 0.001, 0.001, 0.001 and 0.001). 2) SUA predicted poorer outcome of acute stroke after adjustment for age above 60 years and blood glucose level above 200 mg/dl (P = 0.045, n = 96). 3) SUA, blood glucose and age predicted time to in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001, 0.047, <0.001). Conclusion: SUA predicts poorer outcome and time to all cause in-hospital mortality in acute stroke and may also become a reliable surrogate of acute stroke outcome in Africans as shown in other populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚非洲人的血清尿酸和急性中风结局
背景:血清尿酸(SUA)长期以来被认为是血浆中一种有效的抗氧化剂,其在急性脑卒中中的预后价值和治疗作用已在不同人群中得到越来越多的证实。目的:评估入院时SUA在尼日利亚人群急性卒中预后中的作用。环境:尼日利亚的一个三级神经保健中心。设计:前瞻性观察研究。材料与方法:240例30 ~ 91岁首次卒中急性脑卒中患者在出现卒中症状后48小时内连续采血测定SUA和血糖。所有患者均在入院后42天内随访。结果为出院随访并仍在治疗或院内死亡。脑卒中亚型通过颅脑计算机断层扫描(CT)确定;卒中严重程度采用入院格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评估。统计:对卒中结局组的年龄、性别、SUA、血糖和GCS进行比较。在调整年龄大于60岁和血糖高于200 mg/dl后,采用简单逻辑回归检验SUA和卒中结局。采用Cox回归检验SUA、血糖、年龄、脑卒中亚型和GCS对院内全因死亡时间的贡献。结果:1)死亡组患者平均SUA、年龄、血糖升高,平均GCS降低(P < 0.001、0.001、0.001、0.001)。2)经年龄≥60岁、血糖≥200 mg/dl调整后,SUA预测急性卒中预后较差(P = 0.045, n = 96)。3) SUA、血糖、年龄预测住院死亡率时间(P <0.001, 0.047, <0.001)。结论:SUA预测急性卒中较差的预后和全因住院死亡率,也可能成为非洲人急性卒中预后的可靠替代指标,正如在其他人群中所显示的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus among antenatal attendees at the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Nigeria Mental health disorders in Nigeria: A highly neglected disease Blood transfusion malaria: A literature review 68Gallium-DOTANOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography scintigraphy for an unusual case of malignant pheochromocytoma: Findings and review of literature Identification of a surrogate anthropometric measurement to birth weight in high-risk low birth weight newborns in a developing country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1