The Duty to Charge in Police Use of Excessive Force Cases

Rebecca Roiphe
{"title":"The Duty to Charge in Police Use of Excessive Force Cases","authors":"Rebecca Roiphe","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2999755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Responding to the problems of mass incarceration, racial disparities in justice, and wrongful convictions, scholars have focused on prosecutorial overcharging. They have, however, neglected to address undercharging the failure to charge in entire classes of cases. Undercharging can similarly undermine the efficacy and legitimacy of the criminal justice system. While few have focused on this question in the domestic criminal law context, international law scholars have long recognized the social and structural cost for nascent democratic states when they fail to charge those responsible for the prior regime’s human rights abuses. This sort of impunity threatens the rule of law and misses the opportunity to reinforce important democratic values. This Article draws on international law scholarship to argue that there is a duty to investigate and a limited duty to charge crimes that implicate core democratic principles of equality and fairness. Police use of excessive force against unarmed African-American suspects is just this sort of crime.","PeriodicalId":258683,"journal":{"name":"The Cleveland State Law Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleveland State Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2999755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Responding to the problems of mass incarceration, racial disparities in justice, and wrongful convictions, scholars have focused on prosecutorial overcharging. They have, however, neglected to address undercharging the failure to charge in entire classes of cases. Undercharging can similarly undermine the efficacy and legitimacy of the criminal justice system. While few have focused on this question in the domestic criminal law context, international law scholars have long recognized the social and structural cost for nascent democratic states when they fail to charge those responsible for the prior regime’s human rights abuses. This sort of impunity threatens the rule of law and misses the opportunity to reinforce important democratic values. This Article draws on international law scholarship to argue that there is a duty to investigate and a limited duty to charge crimes that implicate core democratic principles of equality and fairness. Police use of excessive force against unarmed African-American suspects is just this sort of crime.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警察过度使用武力案件中的指控责任
针对大规模监禁、司法上的种族差异和错误定罪等问题,学者们把重点放在了检察官的过度收费上。然而,他们忽视了在整个类别的案件中未能起诉的低收费问题。指控不足同样会破坏刑事司法系统的效力和合法性。虽然很少有人在国内刑法背景下关注这一问题,但国际法学者早就认识到,如果新兴民主国家未能对前政权侵犯人权的人提出指控,将会造成社会和结构成本。这种有罪不罚威胁到法治,并错失了加强重要民主价值观的机会。本文借鉴国际法学者的观点,认为在涉及平等和公平的核心民主原则的情况下,存在调查犯罪的义务和起诉犯罪的有限义务。警察对手无寸铁的非裔美国人嫌疑人过度使用武力就是这种犯罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Masterpiece Cakeshop's Homiletics The Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Incapacity and Ability to Discharge the Powers and Duties of Office? How Big Money Ruined Public Life in Wisconsin The Duty to Charge in Police Use of Excessive Force Cases Book Review: Analyzing the Effectiveness of the Tallinn Manual’s Jus Ad Bellum Doctrine on Cyberconflict,: A NATO-Centric Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1