The Value of Pre-contract Information about an Agent's Ability in the Presence of Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection

R. Banker, M. Darrough, Shaopeng Li, Lucas Threinen
{"title":"The Value of Pre-contract Information about an Agent's Ability in the Presence of Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection","authors":"R. Banker, M. Darrough, Shaopeng Li, Lucas Threinen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3472106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the expected value of information about an agent's type in the presence of moral hazard and adverse selection. Information about the agent's type enables the principal to sort/screen agents of different types. The value of the information decreases in the variability of output and the agent's risk aversion, two factors that are typically associated with the severity of the moral hazard problem. However, the value of the information about agent type first increases but ultimately decreases in the severity of adverse selection. The decrease comes about because the means available to the principal to induce effort — namely, the pay-performance sensitivity — must also be used to sort/screen agents, and these two goals conflict. This decline in value occurs despite the monotonically increasing importance of the information in determining the principal's expected profits. Further, we show that the peak value of information occurs at a predictable level of adverse selection. These results imply that over some range, the importance of the information will be increasing, while the value of the information will be simultaneously decreasing, in the severity of adverse selection.","PeriodicalId":204440,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Finance eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance & Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3472106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyze the expected value of information about an agent's type in the presence of moral hazard and adverse selection. Information about the agent's type enables the principal to sort/screen agents of different types. The value of the information decreases in the variability of output and the agent's risk aversion, two factors that are typically associated with the severity of the moral hazard problem. However, the value of the information about agent type first increases but ultimately decreases in the severity of adverse selection. The decrease comes about because the means available to the principal to induce effort — namely, the pay-performance sensitivity — must also be used to sort/screen agents, and these two goals conflict. This decline in value occurs despite the monotonically increasing importance of the information in determining the principal's expected profits. Further, we show that the peak value of information occurs at a predictable level of adverse selection. These results imply that over some range, the importance of the information will be increasing, while the value of the information will be simultaneously decreasing, in the severity of adverse selection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
存在道德风险和逆向选择时代理人能力的契约前信息的价值
我们分析了在存在道德风险和逆向选择的情况下,代理人类型信息的期望值。有关代理类型的信息使主体能够对不同类型的代理进行排序/筛选。信息的价值在产出的可变性和代理人的风险厌恶中下降,这两个因素通常与道德风险问题的严重程度有关。然而,在逆向选择的严重程度上,代理人类型信息的价值先增加后减少。减少的原因是,委托人诱导努力的可用手段——即薪酬-绩效敏感性——也必须用于对代理人进行分类/筛选,这两个目标是冲突的。尽管这些信息在决定委托人的预期利润方面的重要性单调地增加,但价值的下降还是发生了。此外,我们表明,信息的峰值发生在一个可预测的水平的逆向选择。这些结果表明,在逆向选择的严重程度上,在一定范围内,信息的重要性会增加,而信息的价值会同时降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Do Outside CEOs Really Do? Evidence from Plant-Level Data Energy Finance The Pricing of Acquired Intangibles Inclusive Managers How Do Independent Directors View Generalist vs. Specialist CEOs? Evidence from an Exogenous Regulatory Shock
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1